-
1
-
-
0034973773
-
-
For an overview on typical phase I metabolism reactions, mechanisms, and significance for drug discovery, see: F.P. Guengerich Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14 2001 611 650
-
(2001)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
, vol.14
, pp. 611-650
-
-
Guengerich, F.P.1
-
19
-
-
34948835849
-
-
F.G. Gelalcha, B. Bitterlich, G. Anilkumar, M.K. Tse, and M. Beller Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 46 2007 7293 7296
-
(2007)
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
, vol.46
, pp. 7293-7296
-
-
Gelalcha, F.G.1
Bitterlich, B.2
Anilkumar, G.3
Tse, M.K.4
Beller, M.5
-
24
-
-
55549114397
-
-
S.P. Hanlon, T. Friedberg, C.R. Wolf, O. Ghisalba, and M. Kittelmann R.D. Schmid, V. Urlacher, Modern Biooxidation 2007 Wiley-VCH 233 252
-
(2007)
Modern Biooxidation
, pp. 233-252
-
-
Hanlon, S.P.1
Friedberg, T.2
Wolf, C.R.3
Ghisalba, O.4
Kittelmann, M.5
-
25
-
-
48149111027
-
-
S.M. Ceccarelli, G. Schlotterbeck, P. Boissin, M. Binder, B. Buettelmann, S. Hanlon, G. Jaeschke, S. Kolczewski, E. Kupfer, J.-U. Peters, R.H.P. Porter, E.P. Prinssen, M. Rueher, I. Ruf, W. Spooren, A. Stampfli, and E. Vieira ChemMedChem 3 2008 136 144
-
(2008)
ChemMedChem
, vol.3
, pp. 136-144
-
-
Ceccarelli, S.M.1
Schlotterbeck, G.2
Boissin, P.3
Binder, M.4
Buettelmann, B.5
Hanlon, S.6
Jaeschke, G.7
Kolczewski, S.8
Kupfer, E.9
Peters, J.-U.10
Porter, R.H.P.11
Prinssen, E.P.12
Rueher, M.13
Ruf, I.14
Spooren, W.15
Stampfli, A.16
Vieira, E.17
-
33
-
-
60149107980
-
-
E.J. Klinker, S. Shaik, H. Hirao, and L. Que Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 48 2009 1291 1295
-
(2009)
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
, vol.48
, pp. 1291-1295
-
-
Klinker, E.J.1
Shaik, S.2
Hirao, H.3
Que, Jr.L.4
-
34
-
-
78651411877
-
-
note
-
6): δ = 1.39-1.43 (8H, m), 1.61-1.63 (4H, m), 2.27 (2H, t), 2.35-2.37 (4H, m), 2.61 (4H, s), 3.52-3.56 (4H, m), 3.64 (2H, t), 8.00 (2H, s), 9.25 (1H, br s).
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
78651400192
-
-
note
-
15N HMBC (2c), NOESY (3a,b).
-
-
-
-
40
-
-
77956900535
-
-
S. Dragovic, J.S. Boerma, L. van Bergen, N.P.E. Vermeulen, and J.N.M. Commandeur Chem. Res. Toxicol. 23 2010 1467 1476
-
(2010)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
, vol.23
, pp. 1467-1476
-
-
Dragovic, S.1
Boerma, J.S.2
Van Bergen, L.3
Vermeulen, N.P.E.4
Commandeur, J.N.M.5
-
41
-
-
78651382334
-
-
note
-
The purities were assessed by analytical HPLC with UV detection (λ = 254 nm). The yields were corrected for purity (i.e., the impurities do not contribute to the given yield).
-
-
-
-
44
-
-
0020038472
-
-
W.Z. Potter, H.M. Calil, T.A. Sutfin, A.P. Zavadil III, W.J. Jusko, J. Rapoport, and F.K. Goodwin Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 31 1982 393 401
-
(1982)
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
, vol.31
, pp. 393-401
-
-
Potter, W.Z.1
Calil, H.M.2
Sutfin, T.A.3
Zavadil Iii, A.P.4
Jusko, W.J.5
Rapoport, J.6
Goodwin, F.K.7
-
50
-
-
36949047737
-
-
P.A. Bond Nature 213 1967 721
-
(1967)
Nature
, vol.213
, pp. 721
-
-
Bond, P.A.1
-
54
-
-
78651382675
-
-
note
-
Black, tarry products were also observed in the attempted oxidation of propranolol under the original Udenfriend conditions, which gave no conversion of propranolol; thus, the observed polymeric products may originate at least in part from other components of the reaction system, for example, ascorbic acid.
-
-
-
-
55
-
-
78651387617
-
-
note
-
We also attempted to minimize over-oxidation by using the described modified Udenfriend procedure, however with lower amounts (one third) of reagents, and a limited reaction time (2 h). Under these conditions, clozapine gave, after incomplete conversion, 1a in 1.5% yield (62% purity), and 1b in 1.0% yield (100% purity), whereas no oxidation was observed for propranolol.
-
-
-
|