Pedagogical agents in interactive multimedia modules: Issues of variability

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue , 2010, Pages 605-612

  Tien, Lee Tien ^a   Osman, Kamisah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Diversity; Multimedia modules; Pedagogical agent

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651232486     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.082     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing Learning From Examples Using Animated Pedagogical Agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416-427.
2. Baylor, A. L. & Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity and Instructional Role. Presented at International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Maceio, Brazil, 2004.
3. Baylor, A. L. (2002). Expanding Preservice Teacher's Metacognitive Awareness of Instructional Planning through Pedagogical Agents. ETR&D, 50(2), 5-22.
4. Baylor, A. L. (2005). The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes. Proceedings of Workshop on Affective Interactions: Computers in the Affective Loop, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA, 2005.
5. Baylor, A. L., Ryu, J., & Shen, E. (2003). The Effects of Pedagogical Agent Voice and Animation on Learning, Motivation, and Perceived Persona. Paper presented at the Annual World conference of Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, & Telecommunication, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2003.
6. Baylor, A. L., Shen, E., & Huang, X. (2003). Which Pedagogical Agent do Learners Choose? The Effects of Gender and Ethnicity. Paper presented at the E-Learn (World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education), Phonix, Arizona, 2003.
7. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Belynne, K., Viswanath, K., Vye, N., Schwartz, D. & Davis, J. (2004). Incorporating Self Regulated Learning Techniques into Learning by Teaching Environments. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://www.cogsci.northwestern.edu/cogsci2004/papers/paper365.pdf.
8. Chou, C. Y., Chan, T. W. & Lin, C. J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: the past, present and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40, 255-269.
9. Clarebout, G. & Elen, J. (2007). In Search of Pedagogical Agents' Modality and Dialogue Effects in Open Learning Environments. Retrieved July 23, 2009, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ejist/docs/vol10-no1/papers/full- papers/clarebout-elen.pdf.
10. Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. L. & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(3), 267-286.
11. Craig, S. D., Gholson, B. & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features and Redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428-434.
12. Hayes-Roth, B., Maldonado, H., & Moraes, M. (2002). Designing for diversity: Multi cultural characters for a multi-cultural world. Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.stanford.edu/∼kiky/Design4Diversity.pdf.
13. Hill, J. R. & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and Learning in Digital Environments: The Resurgence of Resource- Based Learning. ETR&D, 49(3), 37-52.
14. Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W. & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47-78.
15. Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L. & PALS Group. (2006). Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction. ETR&D, 54(3), 223-243.
16. Kim, Y., Flann, N., Wei, Q. & Ko, Y. (n.d.). MathGirls: Motivating girls to learn math through pedagogical agents. Retreived July 23, 2009, from http://digital.cs.usu.edu/~flann/MathGirls.pdf.
17. Kirk, K. (2008). Performance, Perception and Choice of Animated Pedagogical Agent. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2008).
18. Kizilkaya, G. & Askar, P. (2008). The effect of an embedded pedagogical agent on the students' science achievement. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 5(4), 208-216.
19. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive Requirements for Learning with Open-Ended Learning Environments. ETR&D, 48(3), 61-78.
20. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A. & Bhogal, R. S. (1997). The Persona Effect: Affective Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents. Retreived July 16, 2009, from http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/ intellimedia/papers/dap-chi-97.pdf.
21. Maldonado, H. & Hayes-Roth, B. (2004). Toward Cross-Cultural Believability in Character Design. Retreived July 15, 2009, from http://hci.stanford.edu/publications/2004/CrossCultBelievability0304/ CrossCultBelievability0304.pdf.
22. Maldonado, H., Roselyn Lee, J. E., Brave, S., Nass, C., Nakajima, H., Yamada, R., Iwamura, K., Morishima, Y. (2005). We Learn Better Together: Enhancing eLearning with Emotional Characters. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 408- 417). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T. & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia Learning in an Interactive Self-Explaining Environment: What Works in the Design of Agent-Based Microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806-813.
24. Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K. & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social Cues in Multimedia Learning: Role of Speaker's Voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 419-425.
25. Mohd Feham Md. Ghalib. (2006). Design, Development & Evaluation of a Web Courseware with a Pedagogical Agent. (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2006).
26. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2000). Pedagogical agents in constructivist multimedia environments: The role of image and language in the instructional communication. Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.unm.edu/ ∼moreno/PDFS/Roundtble.pdf.
27. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of Guidance, Reflection, and Interactivity in an Agent-Based Multimedia Game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 117-128.
28. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E. & Lester, J. C. (2000). Life-Like Pedagogical Agents in Constructivist Multimedia Environments: Cognitive Consequences of their Interaction. Retreived July 16, 2009, from http://www.unm.edu/∼moreno/PDFS/ED-MEDIA-DAP.pdf.
29. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A. & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition & Instruction, 19, 177-213.
30. Moundridou, M. & Virvou, M. (2002). Evaluating the Persona Effect of an Interface Agent in an Intelligent Tutoring System. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), retrieved August 26, 2009, from http://thalis.cs. unipi.gr/∼mariam/JCAL.pdf.
31. Park, S. H. & Jung Lim. (2007). Promoting Positive Emotion in Multimedia Learning Using Visual Illustrations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 141-162.
32. Passerini, K. (2007). Performance and Behavioral Outcomes in Technology-Supported Learning: The Role of Interactive Multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 183-211.
33. Predinger, H., Saeyor, S. & Ishizuka, M. (n.d.). Animated Agents for Language Conversation Training. Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.miv.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/papers/helmut-edmedia01.pdf.
34. Reeves, B. & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Slater, D. (2000). Interactive Animated Pedagogical Agents Mixing the Best of Human and Computer-Based Tutors. (Master dissertation, Stanford University, 2000).
36. Veletsianos, G., Yerasimou, T. & Doering, A. (n.d.). The role of intelligent agents on learner performance. Retrieved July 23, 2009, from http://www.alicebot.org/articles/Learner.pdf.
37. Williamson, V. M. & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The Effects of Computer Animation on the Particulate Mental Models of College Chemistry Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 521-534.
38. Xiao, J., Stasko, J., & Catrambone, R. (2004). An empirical study of the effect of agent competence on user performance and perception. Paper presented at the Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York City. Retrieved November 24, 2009, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/∼john. stasko/papers/aamas04.pdf.