A 24-month randomized clinical trial of a two- And three-step etch-and-rinse technique

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 231-236

  Reis, Alessandra ^a   Mânica, Diego ^c   Ferneda, Franciele ^c   Amaral, Roberto ^c   Stanislawczuk, Rodrigo ^b   Manso, Adriana ^d   De Carvalho, Ricardo Marins ^e   Loguercio, Alessandro D ^a  

^a School of Dentistry   (Brazil)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF PONTA GROSSA   (Brazil)

^c University do Oeste de Santa Catarina   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AELITE LS; ALL BOND SYSTEM; ALL-BOND SYSTEM; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LIGHT-CURING OF DENTAL ADHESIVES; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650403629     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28:215-235.
2. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:57-67.
3. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84:118-132.
4. American Dental Association. Council on Scientific Affairs American Dental Association Program Guidelines: Dentin and Enamel Adhesive Materials, June 2001. Chicago: American Dental Association. 2001:1-12.
5. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-881.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26:1-20.
7. van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater 2007; 23:1101-1107.
8. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in noncarious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2008; 24:915-922.
9. Needleman I, Worthington H, Moher D, Schulz K, Altman DG. Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement. Am J Dent 2008; 21:7-12.
10. Swift Jr EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001; 29:1-6.
11. Albers HF. Tooth-colored restoratives. London: BC Decker Inc, 2002; 183-202.
12. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Invest 2005; 9:215-232.
13. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC, Gilner PP. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:1245-1253.
14. Ianzano JA, Gwinnett AJ. Clinical evaluation of Class V restorations using a total etch technique: 1-year results. Am J Dent 1993; 6:207-210.
15. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82:136-140.
16. Gamborgi GP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of enamel border and regional variability on durability of resin-dentin. J Dent 2007; 35:371-376.
17. Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu CK, Carrilho MR. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 2006; 22:973-980.
18. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002; 30:371-382.
19. Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Lai CN. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent 2004; 32:611-621.
20. Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, Svizero NR, Sano H, Kaga M, Pashley DH. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. J Dent Res 2004; 83:843-848.
21. Chersoni S, Acquaviva GL, Prati C, Ferrari M, Grandini S, Pashley DH, Tay FR. In vivo fluid movement through dentin adhesives in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res 2005; 84:223-227. (Pubitemid 43822027)
22. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136:311-322.
23. Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Montanari G. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: A 3-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2:168-173.
24. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000; 16:285-291.
25. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in noncarious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2002; 15:309-311.
26. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: Three-year results. Oper Dent 2003; 28:482-487.
27. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:477-481.
28. Belluz M, Pedrocca M, Gagliani M. Restorative treatment of cervical lesions with resin composites: 4-year results. Am J Dent 2005; 18:307-310. (Pubitemid 43171013)
29. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006; 34:97-105.
30. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2007; 32:11-15.
31. Reis A, Loguercio AD. A 36-month clinical evaluation of an ethanol/water and acetone-based etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2009; 34:386-393.
32. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:775-784.
33. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:593-599.
34. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in noncarious Class V lesions. Oper Dent 2000; 25:46-50.
35. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000; 25:382-387.
36. Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135:451-457.
37. Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140:526-535.
38. Ozgünaltay G, Onen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:1037-1041. (Pubitemid 41697906)
39. Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azevedo CL, Carvalho RM, Julio Singer M, Grande RHM. Moisture spectrum of demineralized dentin for adhesive systems with different solvent bases. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:183-192.
40. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int 2001; 32:385-90.
41. Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, Michels R, Amaral RC, Geraldeli S, Loguercio AD Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140:877-885.
42. Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JR, Grande RH, Klein-Junior CA, Baumhardt-Neto R, Loguercio AD. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent 2008;36:309-315.
43. King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hashimoto M, Ito S, Brackett WW, García-Godoy F, Sunico M. Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent 2005;18:126-134.
44. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 2006; 22:533-544.