Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 226-252

  Heck, Ronald H ^a   Hallinger, Philip ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650374872     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/656299     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Barth, R. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 443-449.
2. Bass, B. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
3. Bass, B., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
4. Berry, W. D. (1984). Nonrecursive causal models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Bollen, K. A., & Davis, W. R. (2009). Causal indicator models: Identification, estimation, and testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 498-522.
6. Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
7. Bridges, E. (1970). Administrative man: Origin or pawn in decision making? Educational Administration Quarterly, 6(1), 7-25.
8. Bridges, E. (1977). The nature of leadership. In L. Cunningham, W. Hack, & R. Nystrand (Eds.), Educational administration: The developing decades. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
9. Bridges, E. (1982). Research on the school administrator: The state-of-the-art, 1967-1980. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 12-33.
10. Conger, J.,&Pearce, C. (2003).Alandscape of opportunities: Future research on shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 285-303). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Cook, T. (2002). Randomized experiments in education. Why are they so rare? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 175-200.
12. Creemers, B. P. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Securing the right to learn: Policy and practice for powerful teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 13-24.
14. Davies, R. (1994). From cross-sectional to longitudinal analysis. In R. Davies & A. Dale (Eds.), Analyzing social and political change: A casebook of methods (pp. 20-40). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Day, D., Gronn, P.,&Salas, S. (2006). Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 211-216.
16. Edvantia. (2005). Shared leadership and school improvement (Research Brief). Nashville, TN: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
17. Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Firestone, W.,&Corbett, D. (1988). Planned organizational change. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 321-341). New York: Longman.
19. Firestone, W. A., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Using bureaucratic and cultural linkages to improve instruction: The principal's contribution. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(2), 7-30.
20. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Fullan, M. (2006). Turnaround leadership. New York: Wiley.
22. Griffin, M. A. (1997). Interaction between individuals and situations: Using HLM procedures to estimate reciprocal relationships. Journal of Management, 23(6), 759-773.
23. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
24. Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 498-518.
25. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996a). The principal's role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 723- 783). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996b). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
27. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
28. Hallinger, P.,&Heck, R. H. (in press). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference? Educational Management, Administration and Leadership.
29. Harris, A. (2005). Leading or misleading? Distributed leadership and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 255-265.
30. Hayduk, L. (2009). Finite feedback cycling in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 658-675.
31. Heck, R. H. (2000). Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: A value-added approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 513-552.
32. Heck, R. H. (2006). Assessing school achievement progress: Comparing alternative approaches. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 667-699.
33. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 33(2), 229-244.
34. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009a). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 626-658.
35. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009b, November). Examining the effects of collaborative leadership and capacity building on school academic improvement: A reciprocal-effects perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration, Anaheim, CA.
36. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010, May). Examining the moderating effect of instructionally-focused leadership on teacher effectiveness and student learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association, Denver.
37. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (in press). Testing a dynamic model of organizational leadership and school improvement. Leadership Quarterly.
38. Heck, R. H., Larson, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94-125.
39. Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 76-95.
40. Hill, P.,&Rowe, K. (1996). Multilevel modeling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 1-34.
41. Hoyle, R., & Panter, A. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL7 user's guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
43. Keller, R. T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 202-210.
44. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, D. S., Bazerman, M.,&Lewicki, R. (1983). Negotiating in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
46. Krüger, M., Witziers, B., & Sleegers, P. (2007). The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(1), 1-20.
47. Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 37-40.
48. Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.
49. Leithwood, K., Anderson, S., Mascall, B.,&Strauss, T. (2010). School leaders' influences on student learning: The four paths. In T. Bush, L. Bell, & D. Middlewood (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management. London: Sage.
50. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teachers sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 679-706.
51. Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation. Retrieved December 19, 2007, from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/ NR/rdonlyres/E3BCCFA5-A88B-45D3-8E27-B973732283C9/ 0/ ReviewofResearchLearningFromLeadership.pdf
52. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). What we have learned and where we go from here. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 269-282). New York: Routledge.
53. Lord, R. (2001). The nature of organizational leadership: Conclusions and implications. In S. Zaccaro & R. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership (pp. 413-436). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Luyten, H., Visscher, A., & Witziers, B. (2005). School effectiveness research: From a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 249-279.
55. Marcoulides, G. A., & Hershberger, S. (1997). Multivariate statistical methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Marks, H., & Printy, S. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
57. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133-163.
58. McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67-101.
59. Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes-what do we know? Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 175-195.
60. Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2009). Revised models and conceptualization of successful school principalship in Tasmania. In B. Mulford & B. Edmunds (Eds.), Successful school principalship in Tasmania. Launceston: Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.
61. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998-2006). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Authors. Ogawa, R.,&Bossert, S. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224-243.
62. Opdenakker, M. C., & Van Damme, J. (2007). Do school context, student composition, and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education? British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 179-206.
63. Patterson, K. A. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(02), 570. (UMI No. 3082719)
64. Peugh, J. L.,&Enders, C. K. (2004). Using anEMcovariance matrix to estimate structural equation models with missing data: Choosing an adjusted sample size to improve the accuracy of inferences. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 1-19.
65. Pitner, N. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 99-122). New York: Longman.
66. Podsakoff, P. (1994). Quantitative methods in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 1-2.
67. Rao, R. K., & Mawhinney, T. C. (1991). Superior-subordinate dyads: Dependence of leader effectiveness on mutual reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 105-118.
68. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 564-588.
70. Schriesheim, C. A.,&Hinkin, T. R. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates:Atheoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 246-257.
71. Seltzer, M., Choi, K.,&Thum, Y. M. (2003). Examining relationships between where students start and how rapidly they progress. Using new developments in growth modeling to gain insight into the distribution of achievement within schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(3), 263-286.
72. Smither, J. W., London, M., & Richmond, K. R. (2005). The relationship between leaders' personality and their reactions to and use of feedback: A longitudinal study. Group and Organization Management, 30(2), 181-210.
73. Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 73-92.
74. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
75. Steers, R. (1975). Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), 546-558.
76. Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
77. Tate, B. (2008). A longitudinal study of the relationships among self-monitoring, authentic leadership, and perceptions of leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(1), 16-29.
78. Thomas, A. (1988). Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance? Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(22), 401-417.
79. Vogelaar, L. W., & Kuipers, H. (1997). Reciprocal longitudinal relations between leader and follower effectiveness. Military Psychology, 9, 199-208.
80. Wiley, S. (2001). Contextual effects on student achievement: School leadership and professional community. Journal of Educational Change, 2(1), 1-33.
81. Willms, J. D. (1992). Monitoring school performance: A guide for educators. London: Falmer.
82. Winston, B. E. (2003, August). Extending Patterson's servant leadership model: Explaining how leaders and followers interact in a circular model. Paper presented at the meeting of the Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, Virginia Beach, VA.
83. Witziers, B., Bosker, R.,&Krüger, M. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 398-425.
84. Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.