A longitudinal study of the relationships among self-monitoring, authentic leadership, and perceptions of leadership

Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 16-29

  Tate, Brian ^a  

^a PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Authentic leadership; Individual differences; Leadership; Longitudinal studies; Perception; Self monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 47749106135     PISSN: 15480518     EISSN: 19397089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1548051808318002     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1998). 360 degree feedback and leadership development. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6 (1), 35-44.
2. Ashford, S.J. (1989). Self-assessments in organizations: A literature review and integrative model. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 133-174). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3. Atwater, L.E., Dionne, S.D., Avolio, B., Camobreco, J.F., & Lau, A.W. (1999). A longitudinal study of the leadership development process: Individual differences predicting leader effectiveness. Human Relations, 52, 1543-1562.
4. twater, L.E., & Yammarino, F.J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions ? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
5. Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., & May, D.R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15 (6), 801-823.
6. Avolio, B.J., Sosik, J.J., Jung, D.I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Leadership models, methods, and applications. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 277-307). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
7. Baril, G.L., Ayman, R., & Palmiter, D.J. (1994). Measuring leader behavior: Moderators of discrepant self and subordinate descriptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24 (1), 82-94.
8. Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1990). The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
9. Bass, B.M., & Yammarino, F.J. (1991). Congruence of self and others' leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40 (4), 437-454.
10. Bedeian, A.G., & Day, D.V. (2004). Can chameleons lead? Leadership Quarterly, 15 (5), 687-718.
11. Bliese, P.D., & Ployhart, R.E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 5 (4), 362-387.
12. Bradley, J.P., Nicol, A.A.M., Charbonneau, D., & Meyer, J.P. (2002). Personality correlates of leadership development in Canadian forces officer candidates. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34 (2), 92-103.
13. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Carless, S.A., & Roberts-Thompson, G.P. (2001). Self-ratings in training programs: An examination of level of performance and the effects of feedback. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9 (3), 217-225.
15. Chemers, M.M., Watson, C.B., & May, S.T. (2000). Dispositional affect and leadership effectiveness: A comparison of self-esteem, optimism, and efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 267-277.
16. Conway, J.M., & Huffcutt, A.I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6 (2), 147-168.
17. Cronshaw, S.F., & Lord, R.G. (1987). Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (1), 97-106.
18. Day, D.V., Schleicher, D.J., Unckless, A.L., & Hiller, N.J. (2002). Self-monitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (2), 390-401.
19. Day, D.V., Sin, H.P., & Chen, T.T. (2004). Assessing the burdens of leadership: Effects of formal leadership roles on individual performance over time. Personnel Psychology, 57 (3), 573-605.
20. De Hoogh, A.H.B., Den Hartog, D.N., & Koopman, P.L. (2005). Linking the Big Five factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership: Perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 839-865.
21. Dirks, K.T., & Ferrin, D.L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 611-628.
22. Eagley, A.H., Karau, S.J., & Makhijani, M.G. (1995). Gender and effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 125-145.
23. Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D. (2003). How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (1), 5-17.
24. Ensley, M.D., Hmieleski, K.M., & Pearce, C.L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17 (3), 217-231.
25. Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (4), 659-676.
26. Gangestad, S.W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (4), 530-555.
27. Gardner, W.L., & Schermerhorn, J.R., Jr. (2004). Performance gains through positive organizational behavior and authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 33 (3), 270-281.
28. George, B. (2003). Leadership is authenticity, not style. In Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value (pp. 18-25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Hackman, J.R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4 (2), 162-187.
30. Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
31. Harris, H.M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41 (1), 43-62.
32. Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1 (1), 104-121.
33. Huber, G.P., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1995). Introduction. In G. P. Huber & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Longitudinal field research methods: Studying processes of organizational change (pp. vii-xiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
35. James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
36. Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R. & Gerhardt, M.W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 765-780.
37. Keller, R.T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (1), 202 -210.
38. Kelly, J.R., & McGrath, J.E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (2), 395-407.
39. Kenny, D.A., & Zaccaro, S.J. (1983). An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68 (4), 678-685.
40. Kilduff, M., & Day, D.V. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (4), 1047-1060.
41. Lim, B., & Ployhart, R.E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (4), 610-621.
42. Lord, R.G., DeVader, C.L., & Alliger, G.M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (3), 402-410.
43. Lord, R.G., & Emrich, C.G. (2001). Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 551-579.
44. Lord, R.G., & Maher, K.J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Routledge.
45. May, D.R., Chan, A.Y.L., Hodges, T.D., & Avolio, B.J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32 (3), 247-260.
46. McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47. McGrath, J.E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1 (1), 7-27.
48. Ostroff, C., Atwater, L.E., & Feinberg, B.J. (2004). Understanding self-other agreement: A look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57 (2), 333-375.
49. Ployhart, R.E., & Hakel, M.D. (1998). The substantive nature of performance variability: Predicting interindividual differences in intraindividual performance. Personnel Psychology, 51, 859-901.
50. Ployhart, R.E., Holtz, B.C., & Bliese, P.D. (2002). Longitudinal data analysis applications of random coefficient modeling to leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 13 (4), 455-486.
51. Ployhart, R.E., Lim, B., & Chan, K. (2001). Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five factor model of personality. Personnel Psychology, 54 (4), 809-842.
52. Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13 (1), 18-35.
53. Smither, J.W., London, M., & Richmond, K.R. (2005). The relationship between leaders' personality and their reactions to and use of multisource feedback: A longitudinal study. Group & Organization Management, 30 (2), 181-210.
54. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 (4), 526-537.
55. Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (1), 125-139.
56. Snyder, M., & Simpson, J.A. (1984). Self-monitoring and dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (6), 1281-1291.
57. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
58. Straus, S.G. (1999). Testing a typology of tasks: An empirical validation of McGrath's (1984) group task circumplex. Small Group Research, 30 (2), 166-187.
59. Weed, S.E., Mitchell, T.R., & Moffitt, W. (1976). Leadership style, subordinate personality, and task type as predictors of performance and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61 (1), 58-66.
60. Whitener, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, A., & Werner, J.M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 513-530.
61. Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
62. Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (2), 308-315.