Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: A value-added approach

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 513-552

  Heck, Ronald H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039438194     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131610021969092     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Barr, R., & Dreeban, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bosker, R., Kremers, E., & Lugthart, E. (1990). School and instructional effects on mathematics achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1, 213-248.
3. Bosker, R., & Scheerens, J. (1989). Issues in the interpretation of the results of school effectiveness research. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 213-248.
4. Brookover, W., & Lezotte, L. (1977). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
5. Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Bryk, A., Raudenbush, S., & Congdon, R. (1996). Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L Programs. Chicago: Scientific Software.
7. Burns, R., & Mason, D. (1998). Class formation and composition in elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 739-772.
8. Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. Review of Research in Education, 8, 158-233.
9. Burstein, L. (1992). The IEA study of mathematics III: Student growth and classroom processes. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.
10. Chou, C. P., Bentler, P, & Pentz, M. (1998). A two-stage approach to multilevel structural equation models: Application to longitudinal data. Unpublished manuscript.
11. Creemers, B. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 5-29.
13. de Leeuw, J., & Kreft, I. (1986). Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Education Statistics, 11, 57-85.
14. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-24.
15. Evans, R. (1999, February 3). The great accountability fallacy. Education Week, 28(21), 35, 52.
16. Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Arnold.
17. Gray, J., & Simes, N. (1991, August). The stability of school effects over time. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, Nottingham, England.
18. Gross, S. (1993). Early mathematics performance and achievement: Results of a study within a large suburban school system. Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 269-287.
19. Guiton, G., & Oakes, J. (1995). Opportunity to learn and conceptions of educational equality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 323-336.
20. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
21. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157-191.
22. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328-355.
23. Hawai'i Department of Education (1996). Effective schools survey. Honolulu, HI: Department of Education.
24. Heck, R., Larsen, T., & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94-125.
25. Heck, R., & Marcoulides, G. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 76-95.
26. Heck, R., & Mayor, R. (1993). School characteristics, school academic indicators, and student outcomes: Implications for policies to improve schools. Journal of Education Policy, 8(2), 143-154.
27. Heck, R., & Thomas, S. (2000). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Hill, P., & Rowe, K. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1-34.
29. Hox, J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
30. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation models: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Jackson, K. (1982). Achievement differences in mathematics: A search for causal explanations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Black Studies, Chicago.
32. Jerald, C. & Boser, U. (1999). Taking stock. Education Week, 28(17), 81-97.
33. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1999). USREL user's guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
34. Kahne, J. (1994). Democratic communities, equity, and excellence: A Deweyan reframing of educational policy analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 233-248.
35. Kamehameha Schools/Bishop Estate. (1993). Native Hawaiian educational assessment project: 1993 survey report. Honolulu, HI: Author.
36. Kaplan, D. (1998). Methods for multilevel data analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.) Modern methods for business research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Kaplan, D., & Elliott, P. (1997). A didactic example of multilevel structural equation modeling applicable to the study of organizations. Structural Equation Modeling, 4(1), 1-23.
38. Lee, V., & Bryk, A. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.
39. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 498-518.
40. Marcoulides, G., & Hershberger, S. (1997). Multivariate statistical methods: A first course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. McDonnell, L. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305-322.
42. Monk, D., & Plecki, M. (1999). Generating and managing resources for school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 491-510.
43. Mortimore, P. (1993). School effectiveness and the management of effective learning and teaching. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 290-310.
44. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters. Wells, England: Open Books.
45. Muthén, B., Huang, L., Jo, B., Khoo, S., Goff, G., Novak, J., & Shih, J. (1995). Opportunity-to-learn effects on achievement: Analytical aspects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 371-403.
46. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
47. National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education. Washington, DC: Author.
48. National Center for Educational Statistics (Report No. NCES 98-015). (1997). Digest of education statistics, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
49. Nuttall, D., Goldstein, H., Prosser, R., & Rasbash, J. (1989). Differential school effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 769-776.
50. Oakes, J. (1989). What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 181-199.
51. Olson, L. (1999). Moving beyond test scores. Education Week, 28(17), 67-73.
52. Raizen, S. (1993). Approaches to the science curriculum for grades K-12. In S. Fitzsimmons & L. Kerpelman (Eds.), Pre-college teacher enhancement in science and mathematics: Status, issues, and problems. Report submitted to the National Science Foundation. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
53. Raudenbush, S. (1989). The analysis of longitudinal, multilevel data. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 721-740.
54. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1-17.
55. Raudenbush, S., & Sampson, R. (1999). Assessing direct and indirect effects in multilevel designs with latent variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 28(2), 123-153.
56. Reynolds, D., & Cuttance, P. (Eds.). (1992). School effectiveness: Research, policy, and practice. London: Cassell.
57. Reynolds, D., & Packer, A. (1992). School effectiveness and school improvement in the 1990's. In D. Reynolds & P. Cuttance (Eds.), School effectiveness: Research, policy, and practice. (pp. 171-188). London: Cassell.
58. Salganik, L. (1994). Apples and apples: Comparing performance indicators for places with similar demographic characteristics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 125-142.
59. Sammons, P., Nuttall, D., & Cuttance, P. (1993). Differential school effectiveness: Results of a reanalysis of the Inner London Education Authority's Junior School Project data. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 381-405.
60. Sammons, P., Nuttall, D., Cuttance, P., & Thomas, S. (1995). Continuity of school effects: A longitudinal analysis of primary and secondary school effects on GCSE performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 285-307.
61. Scheerens, J. (1993). Basic school effectiveness research: Items for the research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 17-36.
62. Scheerens, J., Vermeulen, C., & Pelgrum, W. (1989). Generalizability of instructional and school effectiveness indicators across nations. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 789-799.
63. Seltzer, M. (1995). Furthering our understanding of the effects of educational programs via a slopes-as-outcomes framework. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 295-304.
64. Seltzer, M., Frank, K., & Bryk, A. (1994). The metric matters: The sensitivity of conclusions about growth in student achievement to choice of metric. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1), 41-50.
65. Tate, R., & Wongbundhit, Y.(1983). Random versus nonrandom coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 103-120.
66. Viadero, D. (1999). Setting the bar: How high? Education Week, 28 (17), 21-26.
67. Wang, J. (1998). Opportunity to learn: The impacts and policy implications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(3), 137-156.
68. Wiley, D., & Yoon, B. (1995). Teacher reports on opportunity to learn: Analyses of the 1993 California Learning Assessment System (CLAS). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 355-370.
69. Willett, J., & Sayer, A. (1996). Multilevel models from a multiple group structural equation perspective. In G. Marcoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 125-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70. Willms, J., & Kerckhoff, A. (1995). The challenge of developing new educational indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 113-131.
71. Willms, J., & Raudenbush, S. (1989). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(3), 209-232.
72. Witte, J., & Walsh, D. (1990). A systematic test of the effective schools model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(2), 188-212.