Effect of overglazed and polished surface finishes on the compressive fracture strength of machinable ceramic materials

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 661-667

  Asai, Tetsuya ^a   Kazama, Ryunosuke ^b   Fukushima, Masayoshi ^c   Okiji, Takashi ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Compressive fracture strength; Machinable ceramic

Indexed keywords

CAD/CAMS; COMPRESSIVE FRACTURE STRENGTH; FLAT SURFACES; FRACTURE LOAD; FRACTURE STRENGTHS; HUMAN DENTIN; MACHINABLE CERAMIC; MACHINABLE CERAMICS; POLISHED SURFACES; RESIN CEMENT; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; SURFACE FINISHES; TWO-WAY ANOVA;

CERAMIC MATERIALS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FINISHING; FRACTURE; RESINS;

SURFACES;

ALUMINUM SILICATE; CLEARFIL ESTHETIC CEMENT; ED PRIMER II; GLASS CERAMICS; IPS E.MAX CAD LT; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; LEUCITE; LITHIA DISILICATE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE; PROCAD CERAMIC; RESIN CEMENT; VITA MARK II;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; FELDSPAR; HEAT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 78650048347     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2010-029     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Christensen GJ. Ceramic vs porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: give your patients a choice. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125: 311-314.
2. Chen HY, Hickel R, Setcos JC, Kunzelmann KH. Effect of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 468-475.
3. Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 29-36.
4. Stappert CF, Guess PC, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 21-26.
5. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent 2007; 35: 897-902.
6. Yoshida K, Meng X, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Influence of surface characteristics of four silica-based machinable ceramics on flexural strength and bond strength of a dualcuring resin luting agent. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 407-413.
7. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Thompson WO. The effect of glaze on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 203-207.
8. Giordano R, Cima M, Pober R. Effect of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 311-319.
9. Griggs JA, Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ. Effects of flaw size and auto-glaze treatment on porcelain strength. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1414-1417.
10. Üçtaşli S, Wilson HJ. Influence of layer and stain firing on the fracture strength of heat-pressed ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 170-174.
11. Denry IL, Holloway JA, Tarr LA. Effect of heat treatment on microcrack healing behavior of a machinable dental ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 48: 791-796.
12. de Jager N, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of surface roughness on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 381-388.
13. Fischer H, Brehme M, Telle R, Marx R. Effect of ion exchange of glazed dental glass ceramics on strength parameters. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 72: 175-179.
14. Ahmad R, Morgano SM, Wu BM, Giordano RA. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 421-429.
15. Lohbauer U, Müller FA, Petschelt A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 250-256.
16. Prasad S, Monaco EA Jr, Kim H, Davis EL, Brewer JD. Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 20-28.
17. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG, Belser UC, Meyer JM. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 172-177.
18. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 245-249.
19. Prakki A, Cilli R, Da Costa AU, Gonçalves SE, Mondelli RF, Pereira JC. Effect of resin luting film thickness on fracture resistance of a ceramic cemented to dentin. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 172-178.
20. Casson AM, Glyn Jones JC, Youngson CC, Wood DJ. The effect of luting media on the fracture resistance of a flame sprayed all-ceramic crown. J Dent 2001; 29: 539-544.
21. Saygili G, Sahmali S. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to all-ceramic materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 758-764.
22. Attia A, Kern M. Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 551-556.
23. Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 117-123.
24. Piemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 457-464.
25. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Zellweger G, Büchler A, Zappini G. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1352-1361.
26. Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25: 299-306.
27. Brackett SE, Leary JM, Turner KA, Jordan RD. An evaluation of porcelain strength and the effect of surface treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 446-451.
28. Ward MT, Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of opalescent porcelains after polishing. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 106-110.
29. Aksoy G, Polat H, Polat M, Coskun G. Effect of various treatment and glazing (coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2006; 53: 254-259.
30. Dalkiz M, Sipahi C, Beydemir B. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 217-222.
31. Hirao K, Tomozawa M. Dynamic fatigue of treated highsilica glass: explanation by crack tip blunting. J Am Ceram Soc 1987; 70: 377-382.
32. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 859-865.
33. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 433-442.
34. Attia A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 247-252.
35. Thompson VP, Rekow DE. Dental ceramics and the molar crown testing ground. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12: 26-36.
36. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconiabased ceramics. J Dent 2000; 28: 529-535.
37. Charlton DG, Roberts HW, Tiba A. Measurement of select physical and mechanical properties of 3 machinable ceramic materials. Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 573-579.
38. Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-generated slot-inlay FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 653-660.