Measurement of select physical and mechanical properties of 3 machinable ceramic materials

Quintessence International

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 573-579

  Charlton, David G ^a   Roberts, Howard W ^b   Tiba, Amer ^a  

^a Naval Institute for Dental and Biomedical Research   (United States)

^b USAF   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Ceramic; Machinable; Properties; Strength; Testing

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; VITA MARK II;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 45449086529     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Mörmann WH.The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(suppl):7S-13S.
2. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, ed 11. St Louis: Saunders, 2003:692-693.
3. O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection, ed 2. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:297-298, 300.
4. Estafa D, Dussetschleger F, Acosta C, Reich S. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays. Gen Dent 2003;51:450-454.
5. Mörmann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:47-53.
6. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of CEREC 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns, Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:244-248.
7. Denissen H, Dozic A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:506-513.
8. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina- and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-374.
9. Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys DR, Lampe K. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1714-1723.
10. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the CEREC CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:239-246.
11. Sjögren G, Sletten G, Dahl JE. Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramics assessed by Millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT tests. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:229-236.
12. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study of CEREC CAD/CAM inlays and onlays, Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:122-128.
13. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems, Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
14. Berg NG, Derand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC). Swed Dent J 1997;21:121-127.
15. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(suppl):22S-31S.
16. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001,3:45-64.
17. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61.
18. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Kijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (CEREC) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite, Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:241-246.
19. IPS Empress CAD Scientific Documentation. Amherst, NY: Ivoclar Vivadent, Nov 2006.
20. Vitablocs Mark II for CEREC. Materials Science and Clinical Studies. Brea, CA: Vident, Sept 2003.
21. Paradigm C Technical Product Profile. St Paul, MN: 3M ESPE, March 2006.
22. Attin T, Müller T, Patyk A, Lennon AM. Influence of different bleaching systems on fracture toughness and hardness of enamel. Oper Dent 2004;29: 188-195.
23. Sadan A. The significance of in vitro studies [editorial]. Quintessence Int 2007;38:13.
24. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials, ed 12. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2006:79.
25. Wang H, Pallav P, Isgro G, Feilzer AJ. Fracture toughness comparison of three methods with four dental porcelains. Dent Mater 2007;23:905-910.
26. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:297-307.
27. Combe EC, Shaglouf A-MS, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Dent Mater 1999;15:158-165.
28. Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-generated slot-inlay FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:653-660.
29. Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Gul BE. Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:120-128.
30. Ohyama T, Ikushima K, Akahane S. Physical properties of high-dispersion Leucite reinforced glass ceramic for CAD/CAM. J Dent Res 2006;85(Spec Iss B): 64.
31. Yoshida K, Meng X, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Mechanical properties of four machinable ceramics. J Dent Res 2006;85(Spec Iss B):2062.
32. Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: Current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:513-530.
33. Mencek J. Strength and Fracture of Glass and Ceramics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992:41-49.
34. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part 1. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:441-448.
35. O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:20.
36. Yamaguchi R, Powers JM, Dennison JB. Thermal expansion of visible-light-cured composite resins. Oper Dent 1989;14:64-67.
37. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials, ed 12. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2006:41.
38. Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95: 117-123.
39. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dent Mater 2006;22:176-182.
40. Addison O, Fleming GJ, Marquis PM. The effect of thermocycling on the strength of porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) materials. Dent Mater 2003; 19:291-297.
41. White SN, Zhao XY, Zhaokun Y, Li ZC. Cyclic mechanical failure of feldspathic dental porcelain, Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:413-420.
42. Chen HY, Heckel R, Setcos JC, Kunzelmann KH. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:468-475.
43. Ohyama T, Yoshinari M, Oda Y. Effects of cyclic loading on the strength of all-ceramic materials, Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:28-37.
44. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems, Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:602-609.
45. Anusavice KJ, Lee RB. Effect of firing temperature and water exposure on crack propagation in unglazed porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1075-1081.
46. Morena R, Beaudreau GM, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Fairhurst CW. Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res 1986;65: 993-997.
47. Sherrill CA, O'Brien WJ. Transverse strength of aluminous and feldspathic porcelain. J Dent Res 1974;53:683-690.
48. Baran G, Boberick K, McCool J. Fatigue of restorative materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001;12:350-360.
49. Michalske TA, Freiman SW. A molecular mechanism for stress corrosion in vitreous silica. J Am Ceram Soc 1983;66:284-288.
50. Sakaguchi RL, Cross M, Douglas WH. A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. Dent Mater 1992;8:131-136.
51. Reid CN, Fisher J, Jacobsen PH. Fatigue and wear of dental materials. J Dent 1990;18:209-215.