Schema theory revisited

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 531-566

  McVee, Mary B ^a   Dunsmore, Kailonnie ^b   Gavelek, James R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b CALVIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive science; Embodied; Literacy; Mediation; Sociocultural

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144486715     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543075004531     Document Type: Review

References (137)

1. Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 203-231.
2. Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In R. C. Anderson & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415-431). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, R. C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. Lesgold, J. Pelligrino, S. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and education instruction. New York: Plenum.
4. Anderson, R. C. (1994). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 469-482). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
6. Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 367-381.
7. Au, K. H. (1980). Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children: Analysis of a culturally appropriate instructional event. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11(2), 91-115.
8. Au, K. H. (1998). Social constructivism and the school literacy learning of students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(2), 297-319.
9. Au, K. H., & Mason, J. M. (1981). Social organizational factors in learning to read: The balance of rights hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(1), 115-152.
10. Bartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1932)
11. Beals, D. E. (1998). Reappropriating schema: Conceptions of development from Bartlett and Bakhtin. Mind, Culture, and Activity 5(1), 3-24.
12. Bean, T. W. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constructivist dimensions. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 629-644). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1994). Outcomes of history instruction: Paste-up accounts. In M. Carretero and J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 237-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Gromoll, E. W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6(2), 99-158.
15. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies texts from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(3), 251-276.
16. Blanck, G. (1990). Vygotsky: The man and his cause. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 31-58). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bransford, J. D. (1983). Schema activation and schema acquisition: Comments on Richard C. Anderson's remarks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. C. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools (pp. 259-272). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
19. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383-438). New York: Academic Press.
20. Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. I, pp. 119-160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Brock, C. H. (1997). Exploring a second language learner's opportunities for literacy learning in a mainstream classroom: A collaborative case study analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
22. Brock, C. H., & Raphael, T. E. (2005). Windows to language, literacy, and culture: Insights from an English-language learner. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Campbell, J. (1989). The improbable machine: What the upheavals in artificial intelligence research reveal about how the mind really works. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26. Carver, R. P. (1992). Effect of prediction activities, prior knowledge, and text type upon amount comprehended: Using rauding theory to critique schema theory research. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(2), 164-174.
27. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
28. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting, brain, body, and the world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture. Berkeley: University of California.
31. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
32. D'Andrade, R. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In R. Shweder & R. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 88-119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
34. Dudley-Marling, C., & Murphy, S. (1998). Editor's pages. Language Arts, 76(1), 8-9.
35. Ferdman, B. M. (1990). Literacy and cultural identity. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 181-203.
36. Florio-Ruane, S. (2002). More light: An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 205-215.
37. Florio-Ruane, S., & McVee, M. (2000). Ethnographic approaches to literacy research. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 153-162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Gaffney, J. S., & Anderson, R. C (2000). Trends in reading research in the United States: Changing intellectual currents over three decades. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 53-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Gavelek, J. R., & Raphael, T. E. (1996). Changing talk about text: New roles for teachers and students. Language Arts, 73(3), 182-192.
41. Gee, J. P. (1992). The social mind. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
42. Gee, J. P. (1997a). Meanings in discourses: Coordinating and being coordinated. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 273-302). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
43. Gee, J. P. (1997b). Thinking, learning, and reading: The situated sociocultural mind. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 235-259). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Gee, J. P. (2000). Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 195-207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave.
46. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning. New York: Routledge.
47. Gergen, K., & Gergen, M. (1983). Narratives of the self. In T. Sarbin & K. Scheibe (Eds.), Studies in social identity (pp. 254-273). New York: Praeger.
48. Graves, M. F., Juel, C., & Graves, B. B. (2004). Teaching reading in the 21st century (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
49. Greene, S., & Ackerman, J. M. (1995). Expanding the constructivist metaphor: A rhetorical perspective on literacy research and practice. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 383-420.
50. Gutiérrez, K., Baquendano-Lopez, P., & Turner, M. G. (1997). Putting language back into Language Arts: When the radical middle meets the Third Space. Language Arts, 74(5), 368-378.
51. Hacker, C. J. (1980). From schema theory to classroom practice. Language Arts, 57(8), 866-871.
52. Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
54. Harré, R., & Stearns, P. (1995). Discursive psychology in practice. London: Sage Publications.
55. Hatano, G. (1993). Time to merge Vygotskian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Addison Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 153-166). New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Holland, D., & Cole, M. (1995). Between discourse and schema: Reformulating a cultural-historical approach to culture and mind. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26(4), 475-490.
58. Hruby, G. G. (2001). Sociological, postmodern, and new realism perspectives in social constructionism: Implications for literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 48-62.
59. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (2000). Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Kant, I. (1929). Critique of pure reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). New York: St. Martin's Press. (Original work published in 1781).
62. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 114, 511-550.
64. Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (2003). Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
67. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
68. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608-630.
70. Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1997). Assessment and instruction of reading and writing disability: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
71. Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (2003). Assessment and instruction of reading and writing difficulty: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
72. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
73. Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74. Middleton, D., & Crook, C. (1996). Bartlett and socially ordered consciousness: A discursive perspective: Comments on Rosa. Culture & Psychology, 2, 379-396.
75. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw Hill.
76. Mishra, P., Spiro, R. J., & Feltovich, P. J. (1996). Technology, representation, and cognition: The prefiguring of knowledge in cognitive flexibility hypertexts. In H. van Oostendorp & S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 287-305). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77. Moll, L. C. (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78. Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 20-24.
79. Moll, L. C. (1994). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A socioculturel approach, In R. B. Ruddell & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 179-207). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
80. Moll, L. C. (2001). Through the mediation of others: Vygotskian research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 111-129). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
81. Moll, L. C., & Diaz, R. (1987). Teaching writing as communication: The use of ethnographic findings in classroom practice, In D. Bloome (Ed.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 195-221). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
82. Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52(2), 439-481.
83. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
84. Pearson, P. D. (1982). A primer for schema theory. Volta Review, 84, 25-34.
85. Pearson, P. D. (1992). Reading. In Marvin C. Alkin (Ed.), The encyclopedia of educational research (Vol. 3, pp. 1075-1085). American Educational Research Association.
86. Pearson, P. D. (1996). Reclaiming the center. In M. F. Graves, P. van den Broek, & B. M. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child's right to read (pp. 259-274). New York: Teachers College Press.
87. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (Margaret Cook, Trans). New York: International Universities Press.
88. Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 309-315.
89. Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 273-295.
90. Purcell-Gates, V. (1995). Other people's words: The cycle of low literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91. Purcell-Gates, V., Jacobson, E., & Degener, S. (2004). Print literacy development: Uniting cognitive and social practice theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92. Quinn, N., & Holland, D. (1987). Culture and cognition. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 3-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
93. Ramsey, W., Stich, S. P., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1991). Philosophy and connectionist theory. Hollsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
94. Raphael, T. E. (2001). Literacy teaching, literacy learning: Lessons from the Book Club Plus Project. In J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), 50th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1-20). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
95. Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. D. (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffensen, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1981, April). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension (Tech. Rep. No. 201). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
97. Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffensen, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353-366.
98. Robbins, D. (2003). Vygotsky's and A. A. Leontiev's semiotics andpsycholinguistics: Applications for education, second language acquisition, and theories of language. Westport, CT: Praeger.
99. Rogoff, B. (1993). Children's participation and participatory appropriation in sociocultural activity. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 121-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
100. Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101. Rosa, A., & Montera, I. (1990). The historical context of Vygotsky's work: A sociohistorical approach. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 59-88). New York: Cambridge University Press.
102. Roschelle, J., & Clancey, W. J. (1992). Learning as social and neural. Educational Psychologist, 27(4), 435-453.
103. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1989). Writing and reading transactional theory. In J. Mason (Ed.), Reading and writing connections (pp. 153-176). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
104. Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Free Press.
105. Rumelhart, D. E. (1978). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
106. Rumelhart, D. E. (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull, Handbook of social cognition (pp. 161-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
107. Rumelhart, D. E. (1990). The architecture of mind: A connectionist approach. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 133-159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. Rumelhart, D. E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell & M. Rapp (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 864-894). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
109. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortney, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
110. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
111. Sadoski, M., Paivio, A., & Goetz, E. T. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding theory alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 463-484.
112. Saito, A. (1996). Social origins of cognition: Bartlett, evolutionary perspective and embodied mind approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26(4), 399-421.
113. Saito, A. (Ed.). (2000). Bartlett, culture and cognition. London: Psychology Press.
114. Santa Barbara Discourse Group. (1994). Constructing literacy in classrooms: Literate action as social accomplishment. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 124-154). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
115. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
116. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
117. Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (1988). Making choices for multicultural education. New York: Merrill.
118. Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what's it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 133-169.
119. Spinelli, J. (1990). Maniac Magee. New York: Little, Brown.
120. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 165-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
121. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
122. Spivey, N. N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. New York: Academic Press.
123. Steffensen, M. S., Joag-dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 75(1), 10-29.
124. Tierney, R., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes, In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 246-280). New York: Longman.
125. Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
126. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
127. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
128. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
129. Watson-Gegeo, K. A., & Boggs, S. T. (1977). From verbal play to talk story: The role of routine in speech events among Hawaiian children. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse (pp. 67-90). New York: Academic Press.
130. Weaver, C. (1994). Reading process and practice (2nd ed). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
131. Weaver, C. (2002). Reading process and practice (3rd ed). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
132. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
133. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
134. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
135. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
136. Winograd, T. (1975). Frame representations and the declarative-procedural controversy. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press.
137. Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notebooks, 1914-1916. New York: Harper.