Considerations of the social, individual, and embodied: A response to comments on "schema theory revisited"

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 245-248

  McVee, Mary B ^a   Gavelek, James R ^b   Dunsmore, Kailonnie L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c CALVIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250372608     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/003465430301677     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Beals, D. E. (1998). Reappropriating schema: Conceptions of development from Bartlett and Bakhtin. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(1), 3-24.
2. Bickhard, M. H. (1995). World mirroring versus world making: There's gotta be a better way. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 229-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bickhard, M. H. (2000). Information and representation in autonomous agents. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 65-75.
4. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3(4), 357-370.
5. Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Harré, R. (1986). Social sources of mental content and order. In J. Margolis, P. T. Manicas, R. Harré, & P. F. Secord (Eds.), Psychology: Designing the discipline (pp. 91-127). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7. Harré, R., Clarke, D., & De Carlo, N. (1985). Motives and mechanisms: An introduction to the psychology of action. London: Methuen.
8. Jean Piaget Society. (2002). The embodied mind and consciousness: Developmental perspectives. Philadelphia: Author.
9. Kong, A., & Pearson, P. D. (2003). The road to participation: The construction of literacy practice in a learning community of linguistically diverse learners. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(1), 85-124.
10. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95-107.
11. McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531-565.
12. Moll, L. C. (2001). Through the mediation of others: Vygotskian research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 111-129). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13. Piaget, J. (1954). The child's construction of reality. New York: Basic Books.
14. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In R. B. Rudell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1329-1362). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15. Saito, A. (1996). Social origins of cognition: Bartlett, evolutionary perspective and embodied mind approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26(4), 399-421.
16. Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky the ambivalent Enlightenment rationalist. Heinz Werner Lecture Series, 21, 39-62.
17. Wertsch, J. V. (1996). The role of abstract rationality in Vygotsky's image of mind. In A. Tryphon & J. N. Voneche (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: The social genesis of thought (pp. 25-44). London: Psychology Press.
18. Wertsch, J. V. (2000). Vygotsky's two minds on the nature of meaning. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 19-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.