hi2-1, A QTL which improves harvest index, earliness and alters metabolite accumulation of processing tomatoes

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 121, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1587-1599

  Gur, Amit ^a   Osorio, Sonia ^b   Fridman, Eyal ^a   Fernie, Alisdair R ^b   Zamir, Dani ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMIC VALUES; FLOWERING PATTERNS; GENETIC BACKGROUNDS; HARVEST INDEX; METABOLITE PROFILING; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; PLANT BIOMASS; PLEIOTROPIC EFFECTS; TOTAL YIELD;

AGRONOMY; AMINO ACIDS; FRUITS; GENES; METABOLISM; METABOLITES; PLANTS (BOTANY); SUGAR (SUCROSE);

HARVESTING;

ADAPTATION; AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CROSS BREEDING; DROUGHT; FLOWER; FOOD HANDLING; FRUIT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; INHERITANCE; METABOLISM; METABOLOME; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; TOMATO;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AGRICULTURE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROUGHTS; FLOWERS; FOOD HANDLING; FRUIT; INBREEDING; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; METABOLOME; PHENOTYPE; PHYSICAL CHROMOSOME MAPPING; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII; SOLANUM;

EID: 78649634708     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-010-1412-8     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alonso-Blanco C, El-Assal SE, Coupland G, Koornneef M (1998) Analysis of natural allelic variation at flowering time loci in the Landsberg erecta and Cape Verde Islands ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 149(2): 749-764.
2. Alonso-Blanco C, Aarts MGM, Bentsink L, Keurentjes JJB, Raymond M, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef M (2009) What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? Plant Cell 21: 1877-1896.
3. Andersen CH, Jensen CS, Petersen K (2003) Similar genetic switch systems might integrate the floral inductive pathways in dicots and monocots. Trends Plant Sci 9: 105-107.
4. Atherton JG, Rudich J (1986) The tomato crop. Chapman and Hall, London.
5. Bartels D, Sunkar R (2005) Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24: 23-58.
6. Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986) Methods for detection of single or low-copy sequences in tomato on Southern blots. Plant Mol Biol Rep 4: 37-41.
7. Bugbee BG, Salisbury FB (1988) Exploring the limits of crop productivity. I. Photosynthetic efficiency of wheat in high irradiance environments. Plant Physiol 88: 869-878.
8. Carlborg O, Haley CS (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5(8): 618-625.
9. Carmel-Goren L, Liu YS, Lifschitz E, Zamir D (2003) The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol 52(6): 1215-1222.
10. Cong B, Barrero LS, Tanksley SD (2008) Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication. Nat Genet 40: 800-804.
11. Cremer F, Coupland G (2003) Distinct photoperiodic responses are conferred by the same genetic pathway in Arabidopsis and in rice. Trends Plant Sci 8: 405-407.
12. Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127: 1309-1321.
13. Doganlar S, Mutschler MA, Tanksley SD (2000) Identification and molecular mapping of loci controlling fruit ripening time in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 100: 249-255.
14. Doi K, Izawa T, Yamanouchi U, Kubo T, Shimatano Z, Yano M, Yoshimura A (2004) Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-Iike gene expression independently of Hd1l. Genes Dev 18: 926-936.
15. Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50: 1096-1121.
16. El-Din El-Assal S, Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJ, Raz V, Koornneef M (2001) A QTL for flowering time in Arabidopsis reveals a novel allele of CRY2. Nat Genet 29(4): 435-440.
17. El-Din El-Assal S, Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJ, Wagemaker C, Weller JL, Koornneef M (2003) The role of cryptochrome 2 in flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133(4): 1504-1516.
18. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1994) A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79: 175-179.
19. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141(3): 1147-1162.
20. Fernie AR, Trethewey RN, Krotzky AJ, Willmitzer L (2004) Metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 763-769.
21. Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD (2000) fw2. 2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
22. Fridman E, Liu YS, Carmel-Goren L, Gur A, Shoresh M et al (2002) Two tightly linked QTLs modify tomato sugar content via different physiological pathways. Mol Genet Genomics 266(5): 821-826.
23. Fridman E, Carrari F, Liu YS, Fernie AR, Zamir D (2004) Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science 305: 1786-1789.
24. Frisch M, Melchinger AE (2001) The length of the intact donor chromosome segment around a target gene in marker-assisted backcrossing. Genetics 157(3): 1343-1356.
25. Gur A, Zamir D (2004) Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS Biol 2(10): E245.
26. Gur A, Semel Y, Osorio S, Friedmann M, Seekh S, Ghareeb B, Mohammad A, Pleban T, Gera G, Fernie AR, Zamir D (2010) Quantitative trait loci for yield in a tomato are predominately expressed by the shoot. Theor Appl Genet (submitted).
27. Hackel A, Schauer N, Carrari F, Fernie AR, Grimm B, Kühn C (2006) Sucrose transporter LeSUT1 and LeSUT2 inhibition affects tomato fruit development in different ways. Plant J 45: 180-192.
28. Hay RK (1995) Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology. Ann Appl Biol 126: 197-216.
29. Hospital F (2001) Size of donor chromosome segments around introgressed loci and reduction of linkage drag in marker-assisted backcross programs. Genetics 158(3): 1363-1379.
30. Hsieh TH, Lee JT, Charng YY, Chan MT (2002) Tomato plants ectopically expressing Arabidopsis CBF1 show enhanced resistance to water deficit stress. Plant Physiol 130: 618-626.
31. Izawa T (2007) Adaptation of flowering-time by natural and artificial selection in Arabidopsis and rice. J Exp Bot 58: 3091-3097.
32. Ji I, Chetelat RT (2003) Homoeologous pairing and recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides monosomic addition and substitution lines of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 106: 979-989.
33. Jimenez-Gomez JM, Alonso-Blanco C, Borja A, Anastasio G, Angosto T, Lozano R, Martinez-Zapata JM (2007) Quantitative genetic analysis of flowering time in tomato. Genome 50: 303-315.
34. Kalifa Y, Perlson E, Gilad A, Konrad Z, Scolnik PA, Bar-Zvi D (2004) Over-expression of the water and salt stress-regulated Asr1 gene confers an increased salt tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 27: 1459-1468.
35. Khush GS (2001) Green revolution: the way forward. Nat Rev Genet 2: 815-822.
36. Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJ, Soppe W (1998) Genetic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 345-370.
37. Kopka J, Schauer N, Krueger S, Birkemeyer C, Usadel B, Bergmuller E et al (2005) GMD@CSB. DB: the Golm Metabolome Database. Bioinformatics 21: 1635-1638.
38. Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2010) The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet (in press).
39. Kroymann J, Mitchell-Olds T (2005) Epistasis and balanced polymorphism influencing complex trait variation. Nature 435(7038): 95-98.
40. Laurie DA (1997) Comparative genetics of flowering time. Plant Mol Biol 35(1-2): 167-177.
41. Lippman ZB, Cohen O, Alvarez JP, Abu-Abied M, Pekker I, Paran I, Eshed Y, Zamir D (2008) The making of a compound inflorescence in tomato and related nightshades. PLoS Biol 6(11): e288.
42. Lisec J, Schauer N, Kopka J, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR (2006) Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat Protoc 1: 387-396.
43. Monna L, Lin X, Kojima S, Sasaki T, Yano M (2002) Genetic dissection of a genomic region for a quantitative trait locus, Hd3, into two loci, Hd3a and Hd3b, controlling heading date in rice. Theor Appl Genet 104(5): 772-778.
44. Murai K, Miyamae M, Kato H, Takumi S, Ogihara Y (2003) WAP1, a wheat APETALA1 homolog, plays a central role in the phase transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. Plant Cell Physiol 44(12): 1255-1265.
45. Nunes-Nesi A, Carrari F, Lytovchenko A, Smith AM, Loureiro ME, Ratcliffe RG, Sweetlove LJ, Fernie AR (2005) Enhanced photosynthetic performance and growth as a consequence of decreasing mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Physiol 137: 611-622.
46. Pan Q, Liu YS, Budai-Hadrian O, Sela M, Carmel-Goren L, Zamir D, Fluhr R (2000) Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and arabidopsis. Genetics 155(1): 309-322.
47. Pineiro M, Gomez-Mena C, Schaffer R, Martinez-Zapater JM, Coupland G (2003) Early bolting in short days is related to chromatin remodeling factors and regulates flowering in Arabidopsis by repressing FT. Plant Cell 15(7): 1552-1562.
48. Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E (1998) The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125(11): 1979-1989.
49. Prudent M, Bertin N, Génard M, Muños S, Rolland S, Garcia V, Petit J, Baldet P, Rothan C, Causse M (2010) Genotype-dependent response to carbon availability in growing tomato fruit. Plant Cell Environ. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-3040. 2010. 02139. x.
50. Rick CM (1969) Controlled introgression of chromosomes of Solanum pennellii into Lycopersicon esculentum: segregation and recombination. Genetics 62: 753-768.
51. Rick CM (1972) Further studies on segregation and recombination in backcross derivatives of a tomato species hybrid. Biol Zbl 90: 209-220.
52. Robson PR, McCormac AC, Irvine AS, Smith H (1996) Genetic engineering of harvest index in tobacco through overexpression of a phytochrome gene. Nat Biotechnol 14(8): 995-998.
53. Salamini F (2003) Hormones and the green revolution. Science 302: 71-72.
54. Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G (2000) Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 288(5471): 1613-1616.
55. SAS Institute (2002) JMP statistics and graphics guide: version 5. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
56. Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U, Gur A, Balbo I, Carrari F, Pleban T, Perez-Melis A, Bruedigam C, Kopka J, Willmitzer L, Zamir D, Fernie AR (2006) Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat Biotechnol 24: 447-454.
57. Schauer N, Semel Y, Balbo I, Steinfath M, Repsilber D, Selbig J, Pleban T, Zamir D, Fernie AR (2008) Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. Plant Cell 20: 509-523.
58. Semel Y, Nissenbaum J, Menda N, Zinder M, Krieger U, Issman N, Pleban T, Lippmann Z, Gur A, Zamir D (2006) Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12981-12986.
59. Semel Y, Schauer N, Roessner U, Zamir D, Fernie AR (2007) Metabolite analysis for the comparison of irrigated and non-irrigated field grown tomato of varying genotype. Metabolomics 3: 289-295.
60. Sinclair RS (1998) Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation. Crop Sci 38: 638-643.
61. Tanksley SD (2004) The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 16: S181-S189.
62. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB (1992) High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132(4): 1141-1160.
63. Thornsberry JM, Goodman MM, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Nielsen D, Buckler ES (2001) Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat Genetics 314: 286-289.
64. Valverde F, Mouradov A, Soppe W, Ravenscroft D, Samach A, Coupland G (2004) Photoreceptor regulation of constans protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 303: 1003-1006.
65. Weigel D, Nilsson O (1995) A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature 377(6549): 495-500.
66. Wentzell AM, Rowe HC, Hansen BGm Ticconi C, Halkier BA, Kliebenstein DJ (2007) Linking metabolic QTLs with network and cis-eQTLs controlling biosynthetic pathways. PLOS Genetics 3: 1687-1701.
67. Xue WY, Xing YZ, Weng XY, Zhao Y, Tang WJ, Wang L, Zhou HJ, Yu SB, Xu CG, Li XH, Zhang QF (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40: 761-767.
68. Yadav RS, Hash CT, Bidinger FR, Cavan GP, Howarth CJ (2002) Quantitative trait loci associated with traits determining grain and stover yield in pearl millet under terminal drought-stress conditions. Theor Appl Genet 104(1): 67-83.
69. Yadav R, Hash C, Bidinger F, Devos K, Howarth C (2004) Genomic regions associated with grain yield and aspects of post-flowering drought tolerance in pearl millet across stress environments and tester background. Euphytica 136(3): 265-277.
70. Yamamoto T, Lin H, Sasaki T, Yano M (2000) Identification of heading date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of its epistatic interactions with Hd2 in rice using advanced backcross progeny. Genetics 154(2): 885-891.
71. Yamasaki M, Tenaillon MI, Bi IV, Schroeder SG, Sanchez-Villeda H, Doebley JF, Gaut BS, McMullen MD (2005) A large-scale screen for artificial selection in maize identifies candidate agronomic loci for domestication and crop improvement. Cell 17: 2859-2872.
72. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T (2000) Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12(12): 2473-2484.
73. Yano M, Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Lin H, Sasaki T (2001) Genetic control of flowering time in rice, a short-day plant. Plant Physiol 127(4): 1425-1429.
74. Yu SB, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Li XH, Zhang Q (2002) Identification of quantitative trait loci and epistatic interactions for plant height and heading date in rice. Theor Appl Genet 104(4): 619-625.