Identification and molecular mapping of loci controlling fruit ripening time in tomato

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 249-255

  Doganlar, S ^a   Tanksley, S D ^a   Mutschler, M A ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

CAP; Earliness; Lycopersicon esculentum; QTL; RAPD

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION; DNA POLYMORPHISM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC CROSS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC TRAIT; INTROGRESSION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; RIPENING;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0033969640     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050033     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abacus Concepts, StatView (1992) Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, California
2. Banerjee MK, Kalloo (1989) The inheritance of earliness and fruit weight in crosses between cultivated tomato and two wild species of Lycopersicon. Plant Breed 102:148-152
3. Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986) Methods for detection of single-or low-copy sequences in tomato on Southern blots. Plant Mol Biol Rep 4:37-41
4. Corbeil RR, Butler L (1965) A genetic analysis of time to maturity in a cross between species of the genus Lycopersicon. Can J Genet Cytol 7:341-348
5. DeVicente MC, Tanksley SD (1993) QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596
6. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTLs. Genetics 141:1147-1162
7. Fulton TM, Beck-Bunn T, Emmaty D, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1997) QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theor Appl Genet 95:881-894
8. 1 hybrid tomato cultivars for earliness, fruit size, and yield using diallel analysis. J Am Soc Hort Sci 107:243-247
9. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (1996) QTL analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon piminellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:935-951
10. Khalf-Allah AM, Peirce LC (1963) A comparison of selection methods for improving earliness, fruit size and yield in the tomato. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 82:414-419
11. Kemple JM, Gardner RG (1992) Inheritance of shortened fruit maturation in the cherry tomato Cornell 871213-1 and its relation to fruit size and other components of earliness. J Am Soc Hort Sci 117:646-650
12. Kerr EA (1955) Some factors affecting earliness in the tomato. Can J Agric Sci 35:302-309
13. Konieczny A, Ausubel FM (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J 4:403-410
14. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172-175
15. Landers ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (197) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181
16. Lindhout P, Heusden SV, Pet G, Ooijen JWV, Sandbrik H, Verkerk R, Vrielink R, Zabel P (1994) Perspectives of molecular marker assisted breeding for earliness in tomato. Euphytica 79: 279-286
17. Martin GB, Wiliams JKG, Tanksley SD (1991) Rapid identification of markers linked to a Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near-isogenic lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2336-2340
18. Michalska AM, Kubicki B (1978) Correlations between earliness and other characters in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Genet Pol 19:309-320
19. Monforte AJ, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA (1997) Salt tolerance in Lycopersicon species. VI. Genotype by salinity interaction in quantitative trait loci detection: constitutive and response QTLs. Theor Appl Genet 95:706-713
20. Nelson CJ (1997) QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding. Mol Breed 3:229-235
21. Peirce LC, Currence TM (1959) The efficiency of selecting earliness, yield, and fruit size in a tomato cross. Proc Am Hort Sci 73:294-304
22. Pillen K, Pineda O, Lewis CB, Tanksley SD (1996) Status of genome mapping tools in the taxon Solonaceae. In: Paterson AH (ed) Genome mapping in plants. Academic Press, Austin, Texas, p 281-301
23. Poysa V (1991) Rate of fruit development, leaf growth, and earliness in determinate tomatoes. Can J Plant Sci 71:1211-1218
24. Powers L, Lyon CB (1941) Inheritance studies on duration of developmental stages in crosses within the genus Lycopersicon. Agric Res 63:129-148
25. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vincente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Roder MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND (1992) High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141-1160
26. Weller JT, Soller M, Brody T (1988) Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium by means of genetic markers. Genetics 118:329-340
27. Yeager AF, Meader E (1937) Short cuts in tomato breeding. Am Soc Hort Sci 35:539-540