Standardised library instruction assessment: An institution-specific approach

Information Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Staley, Shannon M ^a   Branch, Nicole A ^a   Hewitt, Tom L ^a  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78549259339     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen, R. & Babbie, E. R. (2008). Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
2. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5olrItLwn)
3. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5oncuELZf)
4. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ond2Mtr6)
5. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ond96duc)
6. Barclay, D. (1993). Evaluating library instruction: doing the best you can with what you have. Reference Quarterly, 33(2), 195-202.
7. Beatty, P. C. & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 1-25.
8. Blixrud, J. C. (2003). Project SAILS: standardized assessment of information literacy skills. ARL Bimonthly Report, (230/231), 18-19.
9. Bogel, G. (2008). Facets of practice. Knowledge Quest, 37(2), 10-15.
10. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5s9NOUjOq)
12. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ondEtg6l)
13. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ondN5rhB)
14. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ondYdZqp)
15. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ondfeIKX)
16. Cameron, L., Wise, S.L. & Lottridge, S.M. (2007). The development and validation of the information literacy test. College & Research Libraries, 68(3), 229-236.
17. Carter, E.W. (2002). 'Doing the best you can with what you have:' lessons learned from outcomes assessment. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1), 36-41.
18. Clyde, L. A. (2004). Digital learning objects. Teacher Librarian, 31(4), 55-57.
19. Desimone, L. M. & Le Floch, K. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1-22.
20. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ondwxdxC)
21. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ondwxdxC)
22. Gilstrap, D.L. & Dupree, J. (2008). Assessing learning, critical reflection and quality educational outcomes: the critical incident questionnaire. College & Research Libraries, 69(5), 407-426.
23. Hansen, J.D. & Dexter, L. (1997). Quality multiple-choice test questions: item-writing. Journal of Education for Business, 73(2), 94-97.
24. Hughes, K. A. (2004). Comparing pretesting methods: cognitive interviews, respondent debriefing and behavior coding. Washington D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
25. Hunsaker, M., Howard, F., Liu, S.H. & Davis, J. (2009). Digital learning objects: a local response to the California State University system initiative. New Library World, 110(3/4), 151-160.
26. Jackson, P. A. (2006). Plagiarism instruction online: assessing undergraduate students' ability to avoid plagiarism. College & Research Libraries, 67(5), 418-428.
27. Jensen, M., Duranczyk, I., Staats, S., Moore, R., Hatch, J. & Somdahl, C. (2006). Using a reciprocal teaching strategy to create multiple-choice exam questions. American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 67-71.
28. Kenney, A. J. (2006). The final hurdle? School Library Journal, 52(3), 62-64.
29. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5one8lCwK)
30. Knight, L.A. (2002). The role of assessment in library user education. Reference Services Review, 30(1), 15-24.
31. Koehler, B. & Swanson, K. (1988). ESL students and bibliographic instruction: learning yet another language. Research Strategies, 6(4), 148-160.
32. Mathson, S. M. & Lorenzen, M. G. (2008). We won't be fooled again: teaching critical thinking via evaluation of hoax and historical revisionist Web sites in a library credit course. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 15(1), 211-230.
33. Merz, L.H. & Mark, B.L. (2002). Assessment in college library instruction programs. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries.
34. Oakleaf, M. (2008). Dangers and opportunities: a conceptual map of information literacy assessment approaches. Portal, 8(3), 233-253.
35. Ouimet, J.A., Bunnage, J.C., Carini, R.M., Kuh, G.D. & Kennedy, J. (2004). Using focus groups, expert advice and cognitive interviews to establish the validity of a college student survey. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 233-250.
36. Persky, A.M. & Pollack, G.M. (2008). Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(4), 1-7.
37. Portmann, C.A. & Roush, A.J. (2004). Assessing the effects of library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(6), 461-465.
38. Radcliff, C.J., Jensen, M.L., Salem, Jr., J.A., Burhanna, K. & Gedeon, J.A. (2007). A practical guide to information literacy assessment for academic librarians. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
39. Rockman, I.F. & Smith, G.W. (2005). Information and communication technology literacy: new assessments for higher education. College & Research Libraries News, 66(8), 587-589.
40. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5oneIJdsR)
41. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5oneO56qG)
42. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5oneTZnKM)
43. Schloman, B. F. & Gedeon, J. A. (2007). Creating TRAILS: tool for real-time assessment of information literacy skills. Knowledge Quest, 35(5), 44-47.
44. Somerville, M. M., Smith, G. W. & Macklin, A.S. (2008). The ETS iSkills TM assessment: a digital age tool. Electronic Library, 26(2), 158-171.
45. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ps1VjSWK)
46. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5ondoU9mW)
47. Watson, J. (2010). A case study: developing learning objects with an explicit learning design. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(1), 41-50.
48. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5oneZ5bUp)
49. Williams, J.L. (2000). Creativity in assessment of library instruction. Reference Services Review, 28(4), 323-334.
50. Willis, G.B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.