A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO INFORMATION LITERACY ASSESSMENT FOR ACADEMIC LIBRARIANS

A Practical Guide to Information Literacy Assessment for Academic Librarians

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-180

  Radcliff, Carolyn J ^a   Jensen, Mary Lee ^a   Salem, Joseph ^a   Burhanna, Kenneth J ^a   Gedeon, Julie A ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIBRARIES;

ASSESSMENT PROCESS; ASSESSMENT TOOL; HIGH EDUCATIONS; INFORMATION LITERACY; INFORMATION LITERACY COURSE; INFORMATION LITERACY INSTRUCTIONS; INTEGRATED INFORMATIONS; ONLINE TUTORIALS; PRACTICAL GUIDE; STAND -ALONE;

CURRICULA;

EID: 85185994179     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (94)

1. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
2. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Standards, performance indicators, and outcomes. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm.
3. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2001). Objectives for information literacy instruction: A model statement for academic librarians. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.htm.
4. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: D. McKay Co., Inc.
5. Clark, D. (2001). Learning domains or Bloom’s taxonomy. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html.
6. Cruz, E. (2003). Bloom’s revised taxonomy. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational technology. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Department of Educational Technology. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/bloomrev/index.htm.
7. Gronlund, N. E. (2004). Writing instructional objectives for teaching and assessment (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
8. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., and Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
9. Hernon, P., Dugan, R. E., and Schwartz, C. (2006). Revisiting outcomes assessment in higher education. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
10. The Higher Learning Commission. (2006). Academic quality improvement program. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from www.aqip.org.
11. Middle States Commission on Higher Education. (2003). Developing research and communication skills: Guidelines for information literacy in the curriculum. Philadelphia, PA: Middle State Commission.
12. Neely, T. Y. (2006). Information literacy assessment: Standards-based tools and assignments. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
13. Saunders, L. (2007). Regional accreditation organizations’ treatment of information literacy: Definitions, collaboration, and assessment. Journal of Academic Librarianship. In press.
14. Suskie, L. A. (2004). Developing learning goals. Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing (pp. 73–93).
15. Airasian, P. W. (2000). Assessment in the classroom: A concise approach (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16. Mertler, C. A. (2003). Classroom assessment: A practical guide for educators. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
17. Oosterhof, A. (2001). Classroom applications of educational measurement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
18. Rinvolucri, M. (2003). How I pay attention in class. Essential Teacher, 1(1), 51–53.
19. Taylor, G. R. (2003). Informal classroom assessment strategies for teachers. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
20. Biemer, P. P. and Lyberg, L. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
21. Czaja, R. and Blair, J. (2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
22. Fink, A. (2003). The survey kit (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Fink, A. (2006). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Powell, R. R. and Connaway, L. S. (2004). Basic research methods for librarians (4th ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
25. Survey design. (2005). The survey system’s tutorial. Petaluma, CA: Creative Research Systems. www.surveysystem.com/sdesign.htm.
26. Survey Monkey.com. (2006). http://surveymonkey.com/.
27. The TLT Group. (2007). The Flashlight program. www.tltgroup.org/Flashlight/flashlightonline.htm.
28. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Standards, performance indicators, and outcomes. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm.
29. Bates, J. A. (2004). Use of narrative interviewing in everyday information behavior research. Library & Information Science Research, 26(1), 15.
30. Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Zweizig, D., Johnson, D. W., Robbins, J., and Besant, M. (1996). Interviewing. The TELL IT! manual: The complete program for evaluating library performance. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
35. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Standards, performance indicators, and outcomes. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm.
36. Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social Research Update. Retrieved January 9, 2006 from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html.
37. Glitz, B. (1997). The focus group technique in library research: An introduction. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 85(4), 385–390.
38. Glitz, B. (1998). Focus groups for libraries and librarians. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
39. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Krueger, R. A. and Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA
42. Sage. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative education and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Shoaf, E. C. (2003). Using a professional moderator in library focus groups. College and Research Libraries, 64(2), 124–132.
44. Tiberius, R. (2001). Making sense and making use of feedback from focus groups. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 87, 63–75.
45. Von Seggern, M. and Young, N. J. (2003). The focus group method in libraries: Issues relating to process and data analysis. Reference Services Review, 31(3), 272–284.
46. Wilcox Johnson, D. (1996). Focus groups. The TELL IT! manual: The complete program for evaluating library performance. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
47. Young, V. (1993). Focus on focus groups. College and Research Libraries News, 7, 391–394.
48. Angelo, T. A. and Cross, K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
49. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Standards, performance indicators, and outcomes. Retrieved June 16, 2006 from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm.
50. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2001). Objectives for information literacy instruction: A model statement for academic librarians. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.htm.
51. Coker, D. R., Kolstad, R. K., and Sosa, A. H. (1988). Improving essay tests: Structuring the items and scoring responses. The Clearing House, 61, 253–255.
52. Criswell, J. R. and Criswell, S. J. (2004). Asking essay questions: Answering contemporary needs. Education, 124(3), 510–516.
53. Frey, B. B., Petersen, S., Edwards, L. M., Pedrotti, J. T., and Peyton, V. (2005). Item-writing rules: Collective wisdom. Teaching & Teacher Education, 21(4), 357–364.
54. Haladyna, T. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Kryspin, W. J. and Feldhusen, J. F. (1974). Developing classroom tests: A guide for writing and evaluating test items. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Pub. Co.
56. Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational assessment of students (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
57. Oermann, M. H. (1999). Developing and scoring essay tests. Nurse Educator, 24(2), 29–32.
58. Ornstein, A. C. (1992). Essay tests: Use, development, and grading. The Clearing House, 65, 175–177.
59. Tuckman, B. W. (1993). The essay test: A look at the advantages and disadvantages. NASSP Bulletin, 77, 20–26.
60. Beyerbach, B. A. (1986). Concept mapping in assessing prospective teachers’concept development. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 291800.
61. Gordon, C. A. (2002). Methods for measuring the influence of concept mapping on student information literacy. School Library Media Research, 5.
62. Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C., Hong, N., Harvey, D., and Peters, K. (1997). Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3–4), 289–308.
63. Novak, J. D. (1995). Concept mapping: A strategy for organizing knowledge. In S. M. Glynn and R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64. Novak, J. D. and Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Sherratt, C. S. and Schlabach, M. L. (1990). The applications of concept mapping in reference and information services. RQ, 30, 60–68.
66. Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18.
67. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Standards, performance indicators, and outcomes. Retrieved May 23, 2006 from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm.
68. Blattner, N. H. and Frazier, C. L. (2002). Developing a performance-based assessment of students’ critical thinking skills. Assessing Writing, 8(1), 47–64.
69. Brualdi, A. (1998). Implementing performance assessment in the classroom. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 6(2). Retrieved March 20, 2007 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v6&n2.
70. Holloway, R. E., Doyle, C. S., and Lindsay, J. (1997). Performance based assessment for information literacy. A paper presented at Treasure Mountain VI Conference, March 31–April 1, 1997. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408938.
71. Huba, M. E. and Freed, J. E. (2000). Using rubrics to provide feedback to students. Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon (pp. 151–200).
72. Mertler, C. A. (2003). Classroom assessment: A practical guide for educators. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
73. Oosterhof, A. (2001). Classroom applications of educational measurement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
74. Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
75. Fast, M. and Armstrong, J. (2003). The course portfolio in a library setting. Research Strategies, 19, 46–56.
76. Lorenzo, G. and Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf.
77. Siemens, G. (2004). ePortfolios. elearnspace. www.elearnspace.org/Articles/eportfolios.htm.
78. Snavely, L. L. and Wright, C. A. (2003). Research portfolio use in undergraduate honors education: Assessment tool and model for future work. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(5), 298–303.
79. SUNY Conference on E-portfolios. (2006). Student samples. www.brockport.edu/eportfolio/StudentSamples.html.
80. Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
81. Zubizarreta, J. (2004). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
82. Audience Dialogue. Software for content analysis. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from www.audiencedialogue.org/soft-cont.html.
83. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). (2005). Guide to social science data preparation and archiving: Best practice throughout the data life cycle. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from www.icpsr.umich.edu/access/dataprep.pdf.
84. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85. Lowe, W. (2002). Software for content analysis—A review. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from http://wcfia.harvard.edu/misc/initiative/identity/publications/content_analysis.pdf.
86. Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Powell, R. R. and Connaway, L. S. (2004). Basic research methods for librarians (4th ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
88. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved March 31, 2006 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v7&n17.
89. Uebersax, J. (2003). Statistical methods for rater agreement. Retrieved July 10, 2006 from http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/agree.htm.
90. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.
91. Cross, P. and Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
92. Kreber, C. K. (Ed.). (2001). Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
93. Powell, R. R. and Connaway, L. S. (2004). Basic research methods for librarians (4th ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
94. Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing. Working with the Results 173