Motion signals deflect relative positions of moving objects

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 2381-2390

  Watanabe, Eiji ^a   Matsunaga, Wataru ^a   Kitaoka, Akiyoshi ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

^b RITSUMEIKAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ambiguous apparent motion; Delta model; Flash lag effect; Kebab illusion; Line motion; Postdiction; Prediction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149410800     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aschersleben G., Musseler J. Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1709-1720.
2. Bachmann T., Poder E. Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 2001, 41(9):1103-1106.
3. Baldo M.V., Klein S.A. Extrapolation or attention shift?. Nature 1995, 378:565-566.
4. Brenner E., Smeets J.B. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 2000, 40(13):1645-1648.
5. Brenner E., Smeets J.B., van den Berg A.V. Smooth eye movements and spatial localisation. Vision Research 2001, 41(17):2253-2259.
6. Cai R., Schlag J. A new form of illusory conjunction between color and shape [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 2001, 1(3):127a.
7. Chappell M., Hine T.J., Acworth C., Hardwick D.R. Attention 'capture' by the flash-lag flash. Vision Research 2006, 46(19):3205-3213.
8. De Valois R.L., De Valois K.K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research 1991, 31(9):1619-1626.
9. Downing P.E., Treisman A.M. The line-motion illusion: Attention or impletion?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23(3):768-779.
10. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 2000, 287:2036-2038.
11. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Motion signals bias localization judgments: A unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Fröhlich illusions. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(4):1-12.
12. Finney D.J. Probit analysis 1971, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 333 p. 3rd ed.
13. Freyd J.J., Finke R.A. Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1984, 10:126-132.
14. Fröhlich F.W. Uber die Messung der Empfindungszeit. Zeitschrift fur Sinnesphysiologie 1923, 54:58-78.
15. Fu Y.X., Shen Y., Dan Y. Motion-induced perceptual extrapolation of blurred visual targets. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21(RC172):1-5.
16. Gauch A., Kerzel D. Comparison of flashed and moving probes in the flash-lag effect: Evidence for misbinding of abrupt and continuous changes. Vision Research 2008, 48(15):1584-1591.
17. Hazelhoff F.F., Wiersma H. Die Wahrnehmungszeit. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie 1924, 96:171-188.
18. Hess C.V. Untersuchungen uber den Erregungsvorgang in Sehorgan bei Kurz- und bei langer dauernder Reizung. Pflugers Archiv fur die Gesamte Physiologie 1904, 101:226-262.
19. Hikosaka O., Miyauchi S., Shimojo S. Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research 1993, 33(9):1219-1240.
20. Ito M. Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Progress in Neurobiology 2006, 78(3-5):272-303.
21. Ito M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9(4):304-313.
22. Jancke D., Erlhagen W., Schoner G., Dinse H.R. Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 2004, 556(Pt 3):971-982.
23. Kanai R., Carlson T.A., Verstraten F.A., Walsh V. Perceived timing of new objects and feature changes. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(7):1-13.
24. Kawahara J., Yokosawa K., Nishida S., Sato T. Illusory line motion in visual search: Attentional or apparent motion?. Perception 1996, 25:901-920.
25. Kawato M., Hayakawa H., Inui T. A forward-inverse optics model of reciprocal connections between visual cortical areas. Network 1993, 4:415-422.
26. Kirschfeld K., Kammer T. The Fröhlich effect: A consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research 1999, 39(22):3702-3709.
27. Kitaoka A., Ashida H. A variant of the anomalous motion illusion based upon contrast and visual latency. Perception 2007, 36:1019-1035.
28. Kobayashi Y., Okada K. Reward prediction error computation in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus neurons. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007, 1104:310-323.
29. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research 2000, 40(2):201-215.
30. MacKay D. Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 1958, 181:507-508.
31. Martin L., Boff K.R., Pola J. Vernier offset produced by rotary target motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1976, 20:138-142.
32. Mateeff S., Hohnsbein J. Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away. Vision Research 1988, 28(6):711-719.
33. Metzger W. Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phanomene Frohlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit. Psychologische Forschung 1932, 16:176-200.
34. Musseler J., Aschersleben G. Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics 1998, 60:683-695.
35. Musseler J., Neumann O. Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (tandem effect): Evidence for an attention-shifting model. Psychological Research 1992, 54:246-266.
36. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 1994, 370:256-257.
37. Nijhawan R. The flash-lag phenomenon: Object motion and eye movements. Perception 2001, 30:263-282.
38. Nijhawan R. Visual prediction: Psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2008, 31(2):179-198. [discussion 198-239].
39. Nishida S., Johnston A. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature 1999, 397:610-612.
40. Purushothaman G., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., Ogmen H. Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 1998, 396:424.
41. Ramachandran V.S., Anstis S.M. Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception 1990, 19(5):611-616.
42. Rizk J.K., Chappell M., Hine T.J. Effect of motion smoothness on the flash-lag illusion. Vision Research 2009, 49(17):2201-2208.
43. Schultz W. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 80(1):1-27.
44. Schultz W., Dickinson A. Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:473-500.
45. Sheth B.R., Nijhawan R., Shimojo S. Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(5):489-495.
46. Shim W.M., Cavanagh P. The motion-induced position shift depends on the perceived direction of bistable quartet motion. Vision Research 2004, 44(20):2393-2401.
47. Snowden R.J. Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Current Biology 1998, 8:1343-1345.
48. Soga R., Akaishi R., Sakai K. Predictive and postdictive mechanisms jointly contribute to visual awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18(3):578-592.
49. Sperling G. Comparisons of real and apparent motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1966, 56:1442.
50. Tse P.U., Logothetis N.K. The duration of 3-d form analysis in transformational apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64(2):244-265.
51. van Beers R.J., Wolpert D.M., Haggard P. Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2001, 85:1914-1922.
52. Whitaker D., McGraw P.V., Pearson S. Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects. Vision Research 1999, 39(18):2999-3009.
53. Whitney D. The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends in Cognitive Science 2002, 6(5):211-216.
54. Whitney D. Contribution of bottom-up and top-down motion processes to perceived position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(6):1380-1397.
55. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. Motion distorts visual space: Shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(9):954-959.
56. Whitney D., Murakami I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1(8):656-657.
57. Williams J.M., Lit A. Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision Research 1983, 23:171-179.
58. Wilson J.A., Anstis S.M. Visual delay as a function of luminance. American Journal of Psychology 1969, 82:350-358.
59. Wohlgemuth A. On the aftereffect of seen movement. The British Journal of Psychology: Monograph Supplements 1911, 1:1-117.
60. Wolpert D.M., Miall R.C., Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2(9):338-347.
61. Zanker J.M., Quenzer T., Fahle M. Perceptual deformation induced by visual motion. Naturwissenschaften 2001, 88:129-132.