Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 1914-1922

  Van Beers, Robert J ^a   Wolpert, Daniel M ^b   Haggard, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; ERROR; EYE FIXATION; EYE POSITION; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 0035011197     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.5.1914     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ANDERSEN RA, SNYDER LH, LI CS, AND STRICANNE B. Coordinate transformations in the representation of spatial information. Curr Opin Neurobiol 3: 171-176, 1993.
2. BRENNER E AND SMEETS JBJ. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Res 40: 1645-1648, 2000.
3. BRIDGEMAN B. A review of the role of efference copy in sensory and oculomotor control systems. Ann Biomed Eng 23: 409-422, 1995.
4. CAI RH, POUGET A, SCHLAG-REY M, AND SCHLAG J. Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals. Nature 386: 601-604, 1997.
5. COLLEWIJN H AND TAMMINGA EP. Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. J Physiol (Lond) 351: 217-250, 1984.
6. CRAWFORD JD, HENRIQUES DYP, AND VILIS T. Curvature of visual space under vertical eye rotation: implications for spatial vision and visuomotor control. J Neurosci 20: 2360-2368, 2000.
7. EAGLEMAN DM AND SEJNOWSKI TJ. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036-2038, 2000.
8. FRÖHLICH FW. Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit [Measuring the time of sensation]. Z Sinnesphysiol 54: 58-78, 1923.
9. HANSEN RM. Spatial localization during pursuit eye movements. Vision Res 19: 1213-1221, 1979.
10. HAZELHOFF F AND WIERSMA H. Die Wahrnemungszeit. Z Psychol 96: 181-188, 1924.
11. HENRIQUES DYP AND CRAWKORD JD. Direction-dependent distortions of retinocentric space in the visuomotor transformation for pointing. Exp Brain Res 132: 179-194, 2000.
12. HENRIQUES DYP, KLIER EM, SMITH MA, LOWY D, AND CRAWFORD JD. Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci 18: 1583-1594, 1998.
13. KHURANA B AND NIJHAWAN R. Extrapolation or attention shift (Reply)? Nature 378: 566, 1997.
14. KIRSCHFELD K AND KAMMER T. The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Res 39: 3702-3709, 1999.
15. KREKELBERG B AND LAPPE M. Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Res 39: 2669-2679, 1999.
16. KREKELBERG B AND LAPPE M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Res 40: 201-215, 2000.
17. KREKELBERG B, LAPPE M, WHITNEY D, CAVANAGH P, EAGLEMAN DM, AND SEJNOWSKI TJ. The position of moving objects. Science 289: 1107a, 2000.
18. LAPPE M AND KREKELBERG B. The position of moving objects. Perception 27: 1437-1449, 1998.
19. MATEEFF S, BOHDANECKY Z, HOHNSBEIN J, EHRENSTEIN WH, AND YAKIMOFF N. A constant latency difference determines directional anisotropy in visual motion perception. Vision Res 31: 2235-2237, 1991a.
20. MATEEFF S AND HOHNSBEIN J. Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away. Vision Res 28: 711-719, 1988.
21. MATEEFF S, YAKIMOFF N, HOHNSBEIN J, EHRENSTEIN WH, BOHDANECKY Z, AND RADIL T. Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception. Vision Res 31: 131-138, 1991B.
22. MATIN L. Visual localization and eye movements. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, edited by Boff KR, Kaufman L, and Thomas JP. New York: Wiley, vol. 1, 1986.
23. MATIN L AND PEARCE DG. Visual perception of direction for stimuli flashed during voluntary saccadic eye movements. Science 148: 1485-1488, 1965.
24. MITRANI L AND DIMITROV G. Retinal location and visual localization during pursuit eye movement. Vision Res 22: 1047-1051, 1982.
25. MON-WILLIAMS M AND TRESILIAN JR. A framework for considering the role of afference and efference in the control and perception of ocular position. Biol Cybern 79: 175-189, 1998.
26. MORRONE MC, ROSS J, AND BURR DC. Apparent position of visual targets during real and simulated saccadic eye movements. J Neurosci 17: 7941-7953, 1997.
27. NIJHAWAN R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256-257, 1994.
28. OHTSUKA K. Properties of memory-guided saccades toward targets flashed during smooth pursuit in human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35: 509-514, 1994.
29. O'REGAN JK. Retinal versus extraretinal influences in flash localization during saccadic eye movements in the presence of a visible background. Percept Psychophys 36: 1-14, 1984.
30. PATEL SS, OGMEN H, BEDELL HE, AND SAMPATH V. Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. Science 290: 1051a, 2000.
31. POUGET A, FISHER SA, AND SEJNOWSKI TJ. Egocentric spatial representation in early vision. J Cogn Neurosci 5: 150-161, 1993.
32. PURUSHOTHAMAN G, PATEL SS, BEDELL HE, AND OGMEN H. Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396: 424, 1998.
33. ROSS J, MORRONE MC, AND BURR DC. Compression of visual space before saccades. Nature 386: 598-601, 1997.
34. SCHLAG J, SCHLAG-REY M, AND DASSONVILLE P. Saccades can be aimed at the spatial location of targets flashed during pursuit. J Neurophysiol 64: 575-581, 1990.
35. VAN DER HEIJDEN AHC, VAN DER GEEST JN, DE LEEUW F, KRIKKE K, AND MÜSSELER J. Sources of position-perception error for small isolated targets. Psychol Res 62: 20-35, 1999.
36. VAN DONKELAAR P. Spatiotemporal modulation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. Neuroreport 10: 2523-2526, 1999.
37. VON HELMHOLTZ H. Treatise on Physiological Optics. New York: Optical Society of America, vol. 3, 1925.
38. WARD F. Pursuit eye movements and visual localization. In: Eye Movements and Psychological Processes, edited by Monty RA and Senders JW. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum, 1976, p. 289-297.
39. WELCH RB AND WARREN DH. Intersensory interactions. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, edited by Boff KR, Kaufman L, and Thomas JP. New York: Wiley, vol. 1, 1986.
40. WHITNEY D AND CAVANAGH P. Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nat Neurosci 3: 954-959, 2000.
41. WHITNEY D, CAVANAGH P AND MURAKAMI I. Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction. Vision Res 40: 3829-3839, 2000a.
42. WHITNEY D, AND MURAKAMI I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nat Neurosci 1: 656-657, 1998.
43. WHITNEY D, MURAKAMI I, AND CAVANAGH P. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Res 40: 137-149, 2000b.
44. WOLPERT DM, MIALL RC, AND KAWATO M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2: 338-347, 1998.