Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 18, 1999, Pages 2999-3009

  Whitaker, David ^a   McGraw, Paul V ^a   Pearson, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

After effect; Human; Illusion; Motion; Size

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIZE PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033009423     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00010-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beverley K.I., Regan D. Texture changes versus size changes as stimuli for motion in depth. Vision Research. 23:1983;1387-1400.
2. De Valois K.K., Lakshminarayanan V., Nygaard R., Schlussel S., Sladky J. Discrimination of relative spatial position. Vision Research. 30:1990;1649-1660.
3. De Valois R.L., De Valois K.K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research. 31:1991;1619-1626.
4. Finke R.A., Freyd J.J., Shyi G.C.-W. Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 115:1986;175-188.
5. Foster D.H., Gravano S. Overshoot of curvature in visual apparent motion. Perception and Psychophysics. 31:1982;411-420.
6. Freyd J.J., Finke R.A. Representational momentum, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 10:1984;126-132.
7. Gregory R.L. Eye and brain. 5th ed. 1998;Oxford University, London.
8. Hubbard T.L., Bharucha J.J. Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception and Psychophysics. 44:1988;211-221.
9. Kelly M.H., Freyd J.J. Explorations of representational momentum. Cognitive Psychology. 19:1987;369-401.
10. Levi D.M., Jiang B.-C., Klein S.A. Spatial interval discrimination with blurred lines: black and white are separate but not equal at multiple spatial scales. Vision Research. 30:1990;1735-1750.
11. Morgan M.J., Baldassi S. How the human visual system encodes the orientation of a texture, and why it makes mistakes. Current Biology. 7:1997;999-1002.
12. Morgan M.J., Casco C. Spatial filtering and spatial primitives in early vision: an explanation of the Zöllner-Judd class of geometrical illusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 242:1990;1-10.
13. Morgan M.J., Moulden B. The Münsterberg figure and twisted cords. Vision Research. 26:1986;1793-1800.
14. Morgan M.J., Hole G.J., Glennerster A. Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Vision Research. 30:1990;1793-1810.
15. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature. 370:1994;256-257.
16. Nishida S., Johnston A. Influence of the motion after-effect on position judgment. Perception, Supplement. 27:1998;50.
17. Ramachandran V.S., Anstis S.M. Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception. 19:1990;611-616.
18. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Illusory motion in depth: after-effect of adaptation to changing size. Vision Research. 18:1978;209-212.
19. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Figure-ground segregation by motion contrast and by luminance contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A1:1984;433-442.
20. Snowden R.J. Perceived spatial position is altered by motion adaptation. Perception, Supplement. 27:1998;49-50.
21. Vincent A., Regan D. Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size. Perception and Psychophysics. 59:1997;32-36.
22. Westheimer G. Location and line orientation as distinguishable primitives in spatial vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 263:1996;503-508.
23. Whitaker D., Latham K. Disentangling the role of spatial scale, separation and eccentricity in Weber's law for position. Vision Research. 37:1997;515-524.