Perceived timing of new objects and feature changes

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2009, Pages

  Kanai, Ryota ^a   Carlson, Thomas A ^b   Verstraten, Frans A J ^c   Walsh, Vincent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Flash lag; Temporal vision; Time

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 67650280678     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.7.5     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arnold, D. H., Ong, Y., & Roseboom, W. (2009). Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect. Journal of Vision, 9(5):4, 1-8, http://journalofvision.org/9/5/4/, doi:10.1167/ 9.5.4.
2. Arnold, D.U., & Wilcock, P. (2007). Cortical processing and perceived timing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2331-2336.
3. Bachmann, T. (1989). Time course of the subjective contrast enhancement for a second stimulus insuccessively paired above-threshold transient forms: Perceptual retouch instead of forward masking. Vision Research, 28, 1255-1261.
4. Bachmann, T., Luiga, I., Pöder, E., & Kalev, K. (2003). Perceptual acceleration of objects in stream: Evidence from flash-lag displays. Consciousness & Cognition, 12, 279-297.
5. Bachmann, T., & Pöder, E. (2001). Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research, 41, 1103-1106.
6. Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2005). The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Research, 45, 1459-1469.
7. Baldo, M. V., & Klein, S. A. (1995) Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature, 378, 565-566.
8. Cai, R., & Shlag, J. (2001). Asynchronous feature binding and the flash-lag illusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 42, S711.
9. Carlson, T. A., Hogendoorn, H., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). The speed of visual attention: What time is it? Journal of Vision, 6(12):6, 1406-1411, http://journalofvision.org/6/12/6/, doi:10.1167/6.12.6.
10. De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1991). Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research, 31, 1619-1626.
11. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287, 2036-2038.
12. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T.J. (2007). Motion signals bias position judgments: A unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump and Frohlich effects. Journal of Vision, 7(4):3, 1-12, http://journalofvision.org/7/4/3/, doi:10.1167/7.4.3.
13. Frey, R. D. (1990). Selective attention, event perception and the criterion of acceptability principle: Evidence supporting and rejecting the doctrine of prior entry. Human-Movement Science, 9, 481-530.
14. Hogben, J. H., & Di Lollo, V. (1974). Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. Vision Research, 14, 1059-1069. 481-530.
15. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
16. Kanai, R., Sheth, B. R., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: Spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization. Vision Research, 44, 2605-2619.
17. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
18. Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift: Reply to Baldo and Klein. Nature, 378, 566.
19. Khurana, B., Watanabe, K., & Nijhawan, R. (2000). The role of attention in motion extrapolation: Are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed? Perception, 29, 675-692.
20. Kreegipuu, K., & Allik, J. (2004). Confusion of space and time in the flash-lag effect. Perception, 33, 293-306.
21. Krekelberg, B. (2001). The persistence of position. Vision Research, 41, 529-439.
22. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (1999). Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Research, 39, 2669-2679.
23. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2000). A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research, 40, 201-215.
24. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 335-339.
25. Linares, D., & Holcombe, A. O. (2008). Position perception: Influence of motion with displacement dissociated from the influence of motion alone. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100, 2472-2476.
26. MacKay, D. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature, 181, 507-508.
27. Maus, G. W., & Nijhawwan, R. (2006). Forward displacements of fading objects in motion: The role of transient signals in perceiving position. Vision Research, 46, 4375-4381.
28. Moore, C. M., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Object updating and the flash-lag effect. Psychological Science, 15, 866-871.
29. Moore, C. M., Mordkoff, J. T., & Enns, J. T. (2007). The path of least persistence: Object status mediates visual updating. Vision Research, 47, 1624-1630.
30. Navarra, J., Vatakis, A., Zampini, M., Humphreys, W., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2005). Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 499-507.
31. Neumann, O., Esselmann, U., & Klotz, W. (1993). Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal-order judgment. Psychological Research, 56, 26-34.
32. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature, 370, 256-257.
33. Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 387-393.
34. Nijhawan, R. (2008). Visual prediction: Psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 179-198.
35. Nijhawan, R., Watanabe, K., Khurana, B., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour: No evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion. Visual Cognition, 11, 275-298.
36. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature, 396, 424.
37. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 65-97.
38. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80, 127-158.
39. Ramachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1990). Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edge. Perception, 19, 611-616.
40. Rao, R. P., Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2001). Optimal smoothing in visual motion perception. Neural Computation, 13, 1243-1253.
41. Raymond, J. E. (2003). New objects, not new features, trigger the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 14, 54-59.
42. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
43. Roufs, J. A. (1963). Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance. Vision Research, 3, 81-91.
44. Rutschmann, J., & Link, R. (1964). Perception of temporal order of stimuli differing in sense mode and simple reaction time. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 18, 345-352.
45. Schneider, K. A., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Components of visual prior entry. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 333-366.
46. Sheth, B. R., Nijhawan, R., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 489-495.
47. Spence, C., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 799-832.
48. Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539-550.
49. Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. R. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. Attention and Performance, IV, 629-685.
50. Tappe, T., Niepel, M., & Neumann, O. (1994). A dissociation between reaction time to sinusoidal gratings and temporal order judgment. Perception, 23, 335-347.
51. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
52. VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects. Perception, 30, 655-668.
53. Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 656-657.
54. Zampini, M., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C. (2005). Audiovisual prior entry. Neuroscience Letters, 381, 217-222.