Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1709-1720

  Aschersleben, Gisa ^a   Müsseler, Jochen ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039552113     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1709     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Aglioti, S., Goodale, M. A., & DeSouza, J. F. X. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Algom, D., & Cohen-Raz, L. (1984). Visual velocity input-output functions: The integration of distance and duration onto subjective velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 486-501.
3. Algom, D., & Cohen-Raz, L. (1987). Sensory and cognitive factors in the processing of visual velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 3-13.
4. Anderson, C. H., & van Essen, D. C. (1987). Shifter circuits: A computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 84, 6297-6301.
5. Aschersleben, G. (1999a). Aufgabenabhängige Datierung von Ereignissen [Task-dependent timing of events]. Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
6. Aschersleben, G. (1999b). Task-dependent timing of perceptual events. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 293-318). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Aschersleben, G., & Bachmann, T. (1999). Synchronization and metacontrast: Evidence for the dual-process attentional theory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (1995). Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 305-317.
9. Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (1997). Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 35-46.
10. Bachmann, T. (1984). The process of perceptual retouch: Nonspecific afferent activation dynamics in explaining visual masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 69-84.
11. Bachmann, T. (1999). Twelve spatiotemporal phenomena and one explanation. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 173-206). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1980). Models of stimulus uncertainty in motion perception. Psychological Review, 87, 435-469.
13. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1975). Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels. Vision Research, 15, 1411-1412.
14. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1992). Parallel processing in human vision: History, review, and critique. In J. Brannan (Ed.), Applications of parallel processing in human vision (pp. 37-78). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 3-36.
16. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473-476.
17. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
18. Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
19. Burr, D. C., & Ross, J. (1986). Visual processing of motion. Trends in Neurosciences, 9, 304-307.
20. Cleland, B. G., Levick, W. R., & Sanderson, K. J. (1973). Properties of sustained and transient cells in the cat retina. Journal of Physiology, 228, 649-680.
21. Dow, B. M. (1974). Functional classes of cells and their laminar distribution in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 37, 927-946.
22. Fahle, M. (1995). Perception of oppositely moving verniers and spatio-temporal interpolation. Vision Research, 35, 925-937.
23. Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Fehrer, E., & Raab, E. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 143-147.
25. Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis (3rd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438.
27. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126-132.
28. Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit [Measuring the time of sensation]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 54, 58-78.
29. Fröhlich, F. W. (1925). Über die Methoden der Empfindungszeitmessung im Gebiete des Gesichtssinnes [On methods to measure the time of sensation in the sense of sight]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 208, 131.
30. Fröhlich, F. W. (1929). Die Empfindungszeit: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre der Zeit-, Raum-und Bewegungswahrnehmung. Jena, Germany: Fischer.
31. Gehrke, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (1999). Use of afferent information and sensorimotor synchronization: Evidence for a sensory accumulator model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
33. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
34. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
35. Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1996). Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science, 274, 427-430.
36. Hansen, R. M., & Skavenski, A. A. (1985). Accuracy of spatial localization near the time of a saccadic eye movement. Vision Research, 25, 1077-1082.
37. Hary, D., & Moore, G. P. (1987). On the performance and stability of human metronome-synchronization strategies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 40, 109-124.
38. Hoffmann, K. P., Stone, J., & Sherman, S. M. (1972). Relay of receptive-field properties in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 518-531.
39. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (1999). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
41. Hubbard, T. L. (1996). Representational momentum, centripetal force, and curvilinear impetus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1049-1060.
42. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1980). Performance of traditional F-test in repeated measure designs under covariance heterogeneity. Communication in Statistics: Theory and Methods, A9, 61-74.
43. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
44. Jaśkowski, P. (1996). Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: Dissociations and hypotheses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 707-730.
45. Jaśkowski, P. (1999). Reaction time and temporal order judgment as measures of perceptual latency: The problem of dissociations. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 265-282). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
46. Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlid effect: A consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research, 39, 3702-3709.
47. Kulikowski, J. J., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1973). Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in vision. Journal of Physiology, 232, 149-162.
48. Liebermann, H. R. (1983). Computation of psychophysical thresholds using the Probit technique. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 15, 446-448.
49. Lotze, H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or the physiology of the mind]. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann.
50. Lupp, U., Hauske, G., & Wolf, W. (1976). Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research, 16, 969-972.
51. Mashhour, M. (1964). Psychophysical relations in the perception of velocity. Stockholm, Sweden: Almquist.
52. Mates, J. (1994a). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence: I. Timing and error corrections. Biological Cybernetics, 70, 463-473.
53. Mates, J. (1994b). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence: II. Stability analysis, error estimation and simulations. Biological Cybernetics, 70, 475-484.
54. May, J. G., Martin, F., MacCana, F., & Lovegrove, W. J. (1988). The effects of spatial frequency and temporal waveform on three measures of temporal processing. Journal of General Psychology, 115, 293-306.
55. Metzger, W. (1932). Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazeloffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit [An attempt toward a common theory of the phenomena of Fröhlich and Hazelhoff and a criticism of their methods to measure sensation time]. Psychologische Forschung, 16, 176-200.
56. Milner, A. D., Perret, D. I., Johnston, R. S., Benson, P. J., Jordan, T. R., Heeley, D. W., Bettucci, D., Mortara, F., Mutani, R., Terazzi, E., & Davidson, D. W. (1991). Perception and action in visual form agnosia. Brain, 114, 405-428.
57. Morgan, M. J., & Benton, S. (1989). Motion-deblurring in human vision. Nature, 340, 385-386.
58. Müller, G. E. (1931). Erklärung der Erscheinungen eines mit konstanter Geschwindigkeit bewegten Lichtstreifens, insbesondere auch des Pihl-Fröhlichschen Phänomens [Explanation of the phenomenon of a lighted bar moving at a constant speed, especially the Pihl-Fröhlich phenomenon]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 62, 167-202.
59. Müsseler, J. (1987). Aufmerksamkeitsverlagerungen und Relativität: Ein experimenteller Beitrag zur Raum-Zeit-Wahrnehmung anhand eines Kontraktionsphänomens (Tandem-Effekt) [Attention shifts and relativity: An experimental study of the perception of space and time using a contraction phenomenon (Tandem effect)]. Munich, Germany: Minerva.
60. Müsseler, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally-ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 121-147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
61. Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1996). Zur Rolle visueller Aufmerksamkeitsverlagerungen bei der Etablierung einer (subjektiv berichtbaren) Raumrepräsentation [The role of attentional shifts in establishing a (subjectively reportable) representation]. In B. Mertsching (Ed.), Aktives Sehen in technischen und biologischen Systemen (pp. 83-92). Sankt Augustin, Germany: Infix.
62. Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 683-695.
63. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
64. Müsseler, J., & Neumann, O. (1992). Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem effect): Evidence for an attention-shifting model. Psychological Research, 54, 246-266.
65. Müsseler, J., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., Mahmud, S. H., Deubel, H., & Ertsey, S. (in press). Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery. Perception & Psychophysics.
66. Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
67. Neumann, O., Ansorge, U., & Klotz, W. (1998). Funktionsdifferenzierung im visuellen Kortex: Grundlage für motorische Aktivierung durch nicht bewußt wahrgenommene Reize? Psychologische Rundschau, 49, 185-196.
68. Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention & performance XV (pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Neumann, O., Koch, R., Niepel, N., & Tappe, T. (1992). Reaktionszeit und zeitliches Reihenfolgeurteil: Übereinstimmung oder Dissoziation? [Reaction time and temporal order judgment: Correspondence or dissociation?] Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 39, 621-645.
70. Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990a). Visuelles Fokussieren: Das Wettenvart-Modell und einige seiner Anwendungen [Visual focusing: the weather-station model and some of its applications]. In C. Meinecke & L. Kehrer (Eds.), Bielefelder Beiträge zur Kognitionspsychologie (pp. 77-108). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
71. Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990b). "Judgement" vs. "response": A general problem and some experimental illustrations. In H. G. Geißler (Ed.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 445-455). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
72. Paillard, J. (1987). Cognitive versus sensorimotor encoding of spatial information. In P. Ellen & C. Thinus-Blanc (Eds.), Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man (pp. 43-77). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhof.
73. Perenin, M. T., & Jeannerod, M. (1975). Residual vision in cortically blind hemifields. Neuropsychologica, 13, 1-7.
74. Piéron, H. (1935). Le processus du métacontraste. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 32, 5-24.
75. Pöppel, E., Held, R., & Frost, D. (1973). Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man. Nature, 243, 295-296.
76. Post, R. B., & Welch, R. B. (1996). Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception, 25, 569-581.
77. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167-201). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
78. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20.
79. Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B., & Vogt, S. (1995). Handlungen als ereignisse [Actions as events]. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Das gedächtnis: Trends, probleme, perspektiven (pp. 129-168). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
80. Rachlin, H. C. (1966). Scaling subjective velocity, distance, and duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 77-82.
81. Rubin, E. (1930). Kritisches und Experimentelles zur "Empfindungszeit" Fröhlichs [Criticism and experiments on Fröhlich's concept of the time of sensation]. Psychologische Forschung, 13, 101-112.
82. Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity - Not perceived as such. Psychological Research, 37, 3-23.
83. Rutschmann, J., & Link, R. (1964). Perception of temporal order of stimuli differing in sense mode and simple reaction time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 345-352.
84. Scott, S. (1998). The point of P-centres. Psychological Research, 61, 4-11.
85. Sekuler, R., & Levinston, E. (1977). The perception of moving targets. Scientific American, 236, 60-73.
86. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (1995). Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 19-31.
87. Tappe, T., Niepel, M., & Neumann, O. (1994). A dissociation between reaction time to sinusoidal gratings and temporal-order judgement. Perception, 23, 335-347.
88. Tolhurst, D. J. (1973). Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus. Journal of Physiology, 231, 385-402.
89. Tynan, D., & Sekuler, R. (1982). Motion processing in peripheral vision: Reaction time and perceived velocity. Vision Research, 22, 61-68.
90. Vorberg, D., & Wing, A. (1996). Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Vol. 2. Motor skills (pp. 181-262). London: Academic Press.
91. Vos, P. G., Bocheva, N., Yakimoff, N., & Helsper, E. (1993). Perceived location of two-dimensional patterns. Vision Research, 33, 2157-2169.
92. Weiskrantz, L., Warrington, E., Sanders, M. D., & Marshall, J. (1974). Visual capacity in the hemianoptic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain, 97, 709-728.