Effect of motion smoothness on the flash-lag illusion

Vision Research

Volumn 49, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 2201-2208

  Rizk, Jacques K ^a   Chappell, Mark ^a   Hine, Trevor J ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Discrete; Flash lag illusion; Optimal apparent motion; Sampled; Smooth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; LIGHT; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 68149124517     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adelson E.H., and Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 2 (1985) 284-299
2. Boring E.G. Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology (1942), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
3. Braddick O. A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research 14 (1974) 519-527
4. Braddick O.J. Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 29 1038 (1980) 137-151
5. Brenner E., and Smeets J.B. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1645-1648
6. Burr D.C., Ross J., and Morrone M.C. Smooth and sampled motion. Vision Research 26 4 (1986) 643-652
7. Cantor C.R.L., and Schor C.M. Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 47 (2007) 2841-2854
8. Chappell M., Hine T.J., Acworth C., and Hardwick D. Attention 'capture' by the flash-lag flash. Vision Research 46 (2006) 3205-3213
9. De Silva H.R. An experimental investigation of the determinants of apparent visual motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (1926) 469-501
10. Eagleman D.M., and Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287 (2000) 2036-2038
11. Eagleman D.M., and Sejnowski T.J. Motion signals bias localization judgments: A unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions. Journal of Vision 7 4 (2007) 1-12
12. Ekroll V., Faul F., and Golz J. Classification of apparent motion percepts based on temporal factors. Journal of Vision 8 4 (2008) 1-22
13. Fahle M., Biester A., and Morrone C. Spatiotemporal interpolation and quality of apparent motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 18 11 (2001) 2668-2678
14. Finney D.J. Probit analysis (1971), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
15. Kanai R., Sheth B.R., and Shimojo S. Dynamical evolution of motion perception. Vision Research 47 (2007) 937-945
16. Kerzel D. Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research 40 (2000) 3703-3715
17. Kerzel D., Jordan J.S., and Musseler J. The role of perception in mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 4 (2001) 829-840
18. Kirschfeld K., and Kammer T. The Fröhlich effect: A Consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research 39 (1999) 3702-3709
19. Kolers P.A. Aspects of motion perception (1972), Pergamon Press, Oxford
20. Krekelberg B., and Lappe M. Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Research 39 (1999) 2669-2679
21. Krekelberg B., and Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based on a slow averaging process. Vision Research 40 (2000) 201-215
22. Krekelberg B., and Lappe M. Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in the Neurosciences 24 (2001) 335-339
23. Lappe M., and Krekelberg B. The position of moving objects. Perception 27 (1998) 1437-1449
24. Morgan M.J., and Turnbull D.F. Smooth eye tracking and the perception of motion in the absence of real movement. Vision Research 18 (1978) 1053-1059
25. Murakami I. The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure. Journal of Vision 1 (2001) 126-136
26. Murakami I. A flash-lag effect in random motion. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3101-3119
27. Müsseler J., Stork S., and Kerzel D. Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect, and representational momentum. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 120-138
28. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370 (1994) 256-257
29. Nijhawan R. Visual prediction: Psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2008) 179-239
30. Öǧmen H., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., and Camuz K. Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 44 (2004) 2109-2128
31. Roulston B.W., Self M.W., and Zeki S. Perceptual compression of space through position integration. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 273 (2006) 2507-2512
32. Schlag J., and Shlag-Rey M. Through the eye, slowly: Delays and localization errors in the visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002) 191-200
33. Steinman R.M., Pizlo Z., and Pizlo F.J. Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer's discovery launched the Gestalt revolution: A minireview. Vision Research 40 (2000) 2257-2262
34. Tyler C.W. Temporal characteristics in apparent motion: Omega movement vs phi movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (1973) 182-192
35. Vreven D., and Verghese P. Predictability and the dynamics of position processing in the flash-lag effect. Perception 34 (2005) 31-44
36. Watson A.B., and Ahumada A.J.J. Model of human visual-motion sensing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science 2 2 (1985) 322-342
37. Wertheimer M. Experimental studies on the seeing of motion. In: Shipley T. (Ed). Classics in psychology (1912/1961), Philosophical Library, New York 1032-1088
38. Whitney D. The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 211-216
39. Whitney D., and Cavanagh P. Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 139-152
40. Zeeman W.P.C., and Roelefs C.O. Some aspects of apparent motion. Acta Pscyhologica 9 (1953) 159-181