Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 489-495

  Sheth, Bhavin R ^a   Nijhawan, Romi ^a   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTROPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NERVE CONDUCTION; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; COLOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0033931688     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/74865     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Nijhawan, R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370, 256-257 (1994).
2. Nijhawan, R. Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation Nature 386, 66-69 (1997).
3. Berry, M. J., Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A. & Meister, M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398, 334-338 (1999).
4. Cavanagh, P. Predicting the present. Nature 386, 19-20 (1997).
5. Zeki, S. The representation of colour in the cerebral cortex. Nature 284, 412-418 (1980).
6. Hartline, H. K. The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina. Am. J. Psychol. 57, 243-249 (1938).
7. Kuffler, S. W. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37-68 (1953).
8. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Integrative action in the cat's lateral geniculate body. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 155, 385-398 (1961).
9. Campbell, F. W., Cooper, G. F. & Enroth-Cugell, C. The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. J. Physiol (Lond.) 203, 223-235 (1969).
10. Schiller, P. H., Finlay, B. L. & Volman, S. F. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. III. Spatial frequency. J. Neurophysiol. 39, 1334-1351 (1976).
11. Schiller, P. H., Finlay, B. L. & Volman, S. F. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. J. Neurophysiol. 39, 1288-1319 (1976).
12. Albright, T. Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 52, 1106-1130 (1984).
13. Hammond, P. & MacKay, D. M. Differential responses of cat visual cortical cells to textured stimuli. Exp. Brain Res. 22, 427-430 (1975).
14. Jonides, J. & Yantis, S. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Percept. Psychophys. 437, 346-354 (1988).
15. Baldo, M. V. C. & Klein, S. A. Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378, 565-566 (1995).
16. Khurana, B. & Nijhawan, R. Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378, 565-566 (1995).
17. von Helmholtz, H. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik II 240-245 (Verlag von Leopold Voss: Hamburg und Leipzig, 1909).
18. Wohlgemuth, A. On the aftereffect of seen movement. Br. J. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl. 1, 1-117 (1911).
19. Snowden, R. J. Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Curr. Biol. 8, 1343-1345 (1998).
20. Nishida, S. & Johnston, A. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature 397, 610-612 (1999).
21. Suzuki, S. & Cavanagh, P. Focused attention distorts visual space: An attentional repulsion effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23, 443-463 (1997).
22. Blakemore, C. & Sutton, P. Size adaptation: a new aftereffect. Science 166, 245-247 (1969).
23. DiLollo, V. Temporal integration in visual memory. J. Exp. Psychol. 109, 75-97 (1980).
24. Coltheart, M. Iconic memory and visible persistence. Percept. Psychophys. 27, 183-228 (1980).
25. DiLollo, V. & Bischof, W. F. Inverse-intensity effect in duration of visible persistence. Psychol. Bull. 118, 223-237 (1995).
26. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E. & Ogmen, H. Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396, 424-424 (1998).
27. Whitney, D. & Murakami, I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 656-657 (1998).
28. Eagleman, D. M. & Sejnowski, T. J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287, 2036-2038 (2000).
29. Maunsell, J. H. & Gibson, J. R. Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 1332-1344 (1992).
30. Turvey, M. T. On peripheral and central processes in vision. Psychol. Rev. 80, 1-52 (1973).
31. Breitmeyer, B. G. Visual Masking: An Integrative Approach (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1984).
32. Bachmann, T. Psychophysiology of Visual Masking (Nova, Commack, New York, 1994).
33. Bartram, D. J. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognit. Psychol. 6, 325-356 (1974).
34. Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perceptions: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognit. Psychol. 15, 238-300 (1983).
35. Efron, R. Conservation of temporal information by perceptual systems. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 518-530 (1973).
36. Brainard, D. H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 443-446 (1997).
37. Pelli, D. G. The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: tranforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437-442 (1997).
38. Boynton, R. M. & Kaiser, P. K. The additivity law made to work for heterochromatic photometry with bipartite fields. Science 161, 366-368 (1968).
39. Finney, D. J. Probit Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1971).
40. McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A. & Teller, D. Y. Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 37, 286-298 (1985).
41. Foster, D. H. & Bischof, W. F. Thresholds from psychometric functions: Superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators. Psychol. Rev. 109, 152-159 (1991).