Investigation of interactions between texture and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli using psychophysical and electrophysiological approaches

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 216, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 109-115

  Roudnitzky, Natacha ^a   Bult, Johannes H F ^b,c   de Wijk, Rene A ^b,d   Reden, Jens ^a   Schuster, Benno ^a   Hummel, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DRESDEN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b TOP INSTITUTE FOOD AND NUTRITION   (Netherlands)

^c NIZO FOOD RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chemosensory event related potentials (ERP); Multiple factor analysis (MFA); Multisensory integration; Orthonasal and retronasal odor; Perceptual interaction; Psychophysical rating; Texture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BUTTER; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FOOD TEXTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MILK; NORMAL HUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY STIMULATION; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SWALLOWING; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ODORS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SMELL; TASTE; TOUCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 78149410579     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.019     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ISO Sensory analysis-vocabulary 1992, International Organization for Standardization, p. 22.
2. Shepherd G.M. Behaviour: smells, brains and hormones. Nature 2006, 439:149-151.
3. Halpern B.P. Retronasal and orthonasal smelling. Chemo Sense 2004, 6:1-7.
4. Aubry V., Etievant P., Sauvageot F., Issanchou S. Sensory analysis of Burgundy Pinot noir wines: a comparison of orthonasal and retronasal profiling. J Sens Stud 1999, 14:97-117.
5. Diaz M.E. Comparison between orthonasal and retronasal flavour perception at different concentrations. Flavour Fragrance J 2004, 19:499-504.
6. Juteau A., Tournier C., Guichard E. Influence of type and amount of gelling agent on flavour perception: physiochemical effect or interaction between senses?. Flavour Fragrance J 2004, 19:483-490.
7. Heilmann S., Hummel T. A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Behav Neurosci 2004, 118:412-419.
8. Pangborn R.M., Szczesniak A. Effect of hydrocolloids and viscosity on flavor and odor intensities of aromatic flavor compounds. J Texture Stud 1974, 4:467-482.
9. Cook D.J., Hollowood T.A., Linforth R.S.T., Taylor A.J. Oral shear stress predicts flavour perception in viscous solutions. Chem Senses 2003, 28:11-23.
10. Saint-Eve A., Martin N., Guillemin H., Semon E., Guichard E., Souchon I. Flavored yogurt complex viscosity influences real-time aroma release in the mouth and sensory properties. J Agric Food Chem 2006, 54:7794-7803.
11. Hollowood T.A., Linforth R.S.T., Taylor A.J. The effect of viscosity on the perception of flavour. Chem Senses 2002, 27:583-591.
12. Weel K.G.C., Boelrijk A.E.M., Alting A.C., van Mil P.J.J.M., Burger J.J., Gruppen H., et al. Flavor release and perception of flavored whey protein gels: perception is determined by texture rather than by release. J Agric Food Chem 2002, 50:5149-5155.
13. Bult J.H.F., de Wijk R.A., Hummel T. Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: Texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neurosci Lett 2007, 411:6.
14. Hummel T., Heilmann S., Landis B.N., Reden J., Frasnelli J., Small D.M., et al. Perceptual differences between chemical stimuli presented through the ortho- or retronasal route. Flavour Fragrance J 2006, 21:42-47.
15. Lee J., Halpern B.P. Retronasal and orthonasal adaptation: similar over 90seconds. Chem Senses 2006, 31:A38-A39.
16. Small D.M., Gerber J.C., Mak Y.E., Hummel T. Differential neural responses evoked by orthonasal versus retronasal odorant perception in humans. Neuron 2005, 47:593-605.
17. Frank R.A., Shaffer G., Smith D.V. Taste-odor similarities predict taste enhancement and suppression in taste-odor mixtures. Chem Senses 1991, 16:523.
18. Schifferstein H.N.J., Verlegh P.W.J. The role of congruency and pleasantness in odor-induced taste enhancement. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1996, 94:87-105.
19. van der Klaauw N.J., Frank R.A. Scaling component intensities of complex stimuli: the influence of response alternatives. Environ Int 1996, 22:21-31.
20. Welge-Lussen A., Drago J., Wolfensberger M., Hummel T. Gustatory stimulation influences the processing of intranasal stimuli. Brain Res 2005, 1038:69.
21. Hummel T., Sekinger B., Wolf S.R., Pauli E., Kobal G. 'Sniffin' Sticks': Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 1997, 22:39-52.
22. Kobal G., Klimek L., Wolfensberger M., Gudziol H., Temmel A., Owen C.M., et al. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000, 257:205-211.
23. Heilmann S., Strehle G., Rosenheim K., Damm M., Hummel T. Clinical assessment of retronasal olfactory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002, 128:414-418.
24. Piculell L Gelling carrageenans. Food polysaccharides and their applications 1995, 205-244. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA. A.M. Stephen (Ed.).
25. Green B.G. Psychophysical measurement of oral chemesthesis. Methods in chemosensory research 2001, 429-464. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. S.A. Simon, M.A.L. Nicolelis (Eds.).
26. Hummel T., Kobal G. Olfactory event-related potentials. Methods in chemosensory research 2001, 429-464. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA. S.A. Simon, M.A.L. Nicolelis (Eds.).
27. Jasper H.H. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International federation. J Electroenceph Clin neurophysiol 1958, 20:371-375.
28. Geisser S., Greenhouse S.W. An extension of Box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Ann Math Stat 1958, 29:885-889.
29. Escofier B., Pages J. Multiple factor-analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal 1994, 18:121.
30. Pages J., Husson F. Inter-laboratory comparison of sensory profiles: methodology and results. Food Qual Pref 2001, 12:297.
31. Visschers R.W., Jacobs M.A., Frasnelli J., Hummel T., Burgering M., Boelrijk A.E.M. Cross-modality of texture and aroma perception is independent of orthonasal or retronasal stimulation. J Agric Food Chem 2006, 54:5509-5515.
32. Deibler K.D. Measuring the effect of food composition on flavor release using the retronasal aroma simulator and solid phase microextraction 2001, Cornell University, Ithaca.
33. Halpern B.P. When are oral cavity odorants available for retronasal olfaction?. Handbook of flavor characterization: sensory analysis, chemistry, and physiology 2004, 51-63. Marcel Dekker, New York. K.D. Deibler, J. Delwiche (Eds.).
34. Buettner A., Schieberle P. Exhaled odorant measurement (EXOM)-a new approach to quantify the degree of in-mouth release of food aroma compounds. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Technol Food Sci Technol 2000, 33:553-559.
35. Buettner A., Beer A., Hannig C., Settles M. Observation of the swallowing process by application of videofluoroscopy and real-time magnetic resonance imaging-consequences for retronasal aroma stimulation. Chem. Senses 2001, 26:1211-1219.
36. Buettner A., Beer A., Hannig C., Settles M., Schieberle P. Physiological and analytical studies on flavor perception dynamics as induced by the eating and swallowing process. Food Qual. Pref. 2002, 13:497-504.
37. Burdach K.J., Doty R.L. The effects of mouth movements, swallowing, and spitting on retronasal odor perception. Physiol. Behav. 1987, 41:353-356.
38. Lawless H.T., Clark C.C. Psychological Biases In Time-Intensity Scaling. Food Technol 1992, 46:81.
39. Clark C.C., Lawless H.T. Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling-an examination of the halo-dumping effect. Chem Senses 1994, 19:583-594.
40. Prescott J., Johnstone V., Francis J. Odor-taste interactions: effects of attentional strategies during exposure. Chem Senses 2004, 29:331-340.
41. Lorig A.C., Sapp J., Campbell J., Cain W.S. Event-related potentials to odor stimuli. Bull Psychon Soc 1993, 31:131-134.
42. Pause B.M., Krauel K., Sojka B., Ferstl R. Is odor processing related to oral breathing?. Int J Psychophysiol 1999, 32:251-260.
43. Kobal G., Hummel C. Cerebral chemosensory evoked-potentials elicited by chemical-stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal-mucosa. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988, 71:241-250.
44. Livermore A., Hummel T., Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials in the investigation of interactions between the olfactory and the somatosensory (trigeminal) systems. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 83:201-210.
45. Hummel T., Barz S., Lotsch J., Roscher S., Kettenmann B., Kobal G. Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity. Chem Senses 1996, 21:75-79.
46. Small D.M., Prescott J. Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp Brain Res 2005, 166:345-357.