Biotechnological properties of distillery and laboratory yeasts in response to industrial stresses

Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1071-1079

  Bravim, Fernanda ^a   Palhano, Fernando L ^b   Fernandes, A Alberto R ^a   Fernandes, Patricia M B ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ESPÍRITO SANTO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; Hydrostatic pressure; Laboratory and industrial strains

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; DISTILLATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; INDUSTRY; STRESS; WILD TYPE; YEAST; YEAST CELL;

ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; ETHANOL; FOOD INDUSTRY; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; PLOIDIES; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; YEASTS;

EID: 78149359426     PISSN: 13675435     EISSN: 14765535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0755-0     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abe F (2008) Effects of growth-permissive pressure on the physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Michiels C, Bartlett DH, Aertsen A (eds) High pressure microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 167-179
2. Aguilera J, Randez-Gil F, Prieto JA (2007) Cold response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: new functions for old mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:327-341. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976. 2007.00066.x
3. Albers E, Larson C (2009) A comparison of stress tolerance in YPD and industrial lignocellulose-based medium among industrial and laboratory yeast strains. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1085-1091. doi:10.1007/s10295-009-0592-1
4. Arai S, Kawarai T, Arai R, Yoshida M, Furukawa S, Ogihara H, Yamasaki M (2008) Cessation of cytokinesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe during growth after release from high hydrostatic pressure treatment. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72:88-93. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70451
5. Attfield PV (1997) Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast. Nat Biotechnol 15:1351-1357. doi: 10.1038/nbt1297-1351
6. Avery SV (2006) Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:577-587. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1460
7. Ayscough K, Hajibagheri NM, Watson R, Warren G (1993) Stacking of Golgi cisternae in Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires intact microtubules. J Cell Sci 106:1227-1237
8. Bähler J (2005) Cell-cycle control of gene expression in budding and fission yeast. Annu Rev Genet 39:69-94. doi:10.1146/ annurev.genet.39.110304. 095808
9. Barnes CA, Johnston GC, Singer RA (1990) Thermotolerance is independent of induction of the full spectrum of heat shock proteins and of cell cycle blockage in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 172:4352-4358. doi:0021-9193/90/ 084352-07$02.00/0
10. Barnet JA, Payne RW, Yarrow B (2000) Yeasts: characteristics and identification. Cambridge University Press, Cambrigde
11. Bakalinsky AT, Snow R (1990) The chromosomal constitution of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 6:367-382. doi: 10.1002/yea.320060503
12. Belo I, Pinheiro R, Mota M (2003) Fed-batch cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a hyperbaric bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog 19:665-671 10.1021/bp0257067
13. Brown JM, Attardi LD (2005) The role of apoptosis in cancer development and treatment response. Nat Rev Cancer 5:231-237. doi:10.1038/nrc1560
14. Craig EA (1985) The heat shock response. CRC Crit Rev Biochem 18:239-280
15. Creusot F, Verdière J, Gaisne M, Slonimski PP (1988) CYP1 (HAP1) regulator of oxygen-dependent gene expression in yeast: I. Overall organization of the protein sequence displays several novel structural domains. J Mol Biol 204:263-276. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90574-8
16. de Almeida JM (2005) Yeast community survey in the Tagus estuary. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:295-303. doi:10.1016/ j.femsec.2005.01.006
17. Delley PA, Hall MN (1999) Cell wall stress depolarizes cell growth via hyperactivation of RHO1. J Cell Biol 147:163-174
18. Devore JL (2006) Probabilidade e Estatística para Engenharia e Ciências. Thompson, São Paulo
19. Downing KH (2000) Structural basis for the interaction of tubulin with proteins and drugs that affect microtubule dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16:89-111. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio. 16.1.89
20. Elliott B, Futcher B (1993) Stress resistance of yeast-cells is largely independent of cell-cycle phase. Yeast 9:33-42. doi: 10.1002/yea.320090105
21. Estruch F (2000) Stress-controlled transcription factors, stressinduced genes and stress tolerance in budding yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:469-486. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000. tb00551.x
22. Fernandes PMB, Panek AD, Kurtenbach E (1997) Effect of hydrostatic pressure on a mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deleted in the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene. FEMS Microbiol Lett 152:17-21. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10403.x
23. Fernandes PMB, Farina M, Kurtenbach E (2001) Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the morphology and ultrastructure of wild-type and trehalose synthase mutant cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lett Appl Microbiol 32:42-46. doi:10.1111/j.1472- 765X.2001.00853.x
24. Fernandes PMB, Domitrovic T, Kao CM, Kurtenbach E (2004) Genome expression pattern in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in response to high hydrostatic pressure. FEBS Lett 556:153-160. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01396-6
25. Fernandes PMB (2005) How does yeast respond to pressure? Braz J Med Biol Res 38:1239-1245. doi:10.1590/S0100- 879X2005000800012
26. Fernandes PMB (2008) Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to high hydrostatic pressure. In: Michiels C, Bartlett DH, Aertsen A (eds) High pressure microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 145-166
27. Flattery-O'Brien JA, Dawes IW (1998) Hydrogen peroxide causes RAD9-dependent cell cycle arrest in G2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae whereas menadione causes G1 arrest independent of RAD9 function. J Biol Chem 273:8564-8571. doi:10.1074/ jbc.273.15.8564
28. Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AA, Clark I, Niño I, Gosset G, Martinez A (2004) Response to different environmental stress conditions of industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:734-741. doi:10.1007/ s00253-003-1414-4
29. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11:4241-4257
30. George VT, Brooks G, Humphrey TC (2007) Regulation of cell cycle and stress responses to hydrostatic pressure in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 18:4168-4179. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-12-1141
31. Gerke JP, Chen CTL, Cohen BA (2006) Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics 174:985-997. doi:10.1534/ genetics.106.058453
32. Hochwagen A, Wrobel G, Cartron M, Demougin P, Niederhauser- Wiederkehr C, Boselli MG, Primig M, Amon A (2005) Novel response to microtubule perturbation in meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 25:4767-4781. doi:10.1128/MCB.25.11.4767-4781.2005
33. Itskevich ES (1962) Electric resistance of cerium at low temperatures and high pressures. Zhur Eksptl i Teoret Fiz 42:1173
34. Kale SP, Jazwinski SM (1996) Differential response to UV stress and DNA damage during the yeast replicative life span. Dev Genet 18:154-160. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)18:2\154:: AID-DVG8[3.0.CO;2-8
35. Kobori H, Sato M, Tameike A, Hamada K, Shimada S, Osumi M (1996) Changes in microfilaments and microtubules of yeasts induced by pressure stress. In: Hayashi R, Balny C (eds) High pressure bioscience and biotechnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 83-94
36. Li AW, Singer RA, Johnston GC (1984) Cell cycle effects in yeast cells of the antifungal agent Sinefungin. FEMS Microbiol Lett 23:243-247. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb01071.x
37. Lucau-Danila A, Lelandais G, Kozovska Z, Tanty V, Delaveau T, Devaux F, Jacq C (2005) Early expression of yeast genes affected by chemical stress. Mol Cell Biol 25:1860-1868. doi:10.1128/ MCB.25.5.1860-1868.2005
38. Macgregor RB (2002) The interactions of nucleic acids at elevated hydrostatic pressure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1595:266-276. doi:10.1016/S0167- 4838(01)00349-1
39. Mentré P, Hui Bon Hoa G (2001) Effects of high hydrostatic pressures on living cells: a consequence of the properties of macromolecules and macromolecule-associated water. Int Rev Cytol 201:1-84
40. Michiels C, Bartlett DH, Aertsen A (2008) High pressure microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington
41. Miura T, Minegishi H, Usami R, Abe F (2006) Systematic analysis of HSP gene expression and effects on cell growth and survival at high hydrostatic pressure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Extremophiles 10:279-284. doi:10.1007/s00792-005-0496-6
42. Newman JR, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, DeRisi JL, Weissman JS (2006) Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441:840-846. doi:10.1038/nature04785
43. Palhano FL, Orlando MTD, Fernandes PMB (2004) Induction of baroresistance by hydrogen peroxide, ethanol and cold-shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 233:139-145. doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.02.002
44. Pataro C, Guerra JB, Petrillo-Peixoto ML, Mendonça-Hagler LC, Linardi VR, Rosa CA (2000) Yeast communities and genetic polymorphism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains associated with artisanal fermentation in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol 89:24-31. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01092.x
45. Picard A, Daniel I, Montagnac G, Oger P (2007) In situ monitoring by quantitative Raman spectroscopy of alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae under high pressure. Extremophiles 11:445-452. doi:10.1007/s00792- 006-0054-x
46. Plesset J, Ludwig JR, Cox BS, McLaughlin CS (1987) Effect of cell cycle position on thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 169:779-784. doi:0021-9193/87/020779- 06$02.00/0
47. Rosin MP, Zimmerman AM (1977) Mutagenic action of hydrostatic pressure on yeast: a cell cycle analysis. Mutat Res 44:207-216. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(77) 90078-1
48. Salmon JM (1997) Enological fermentation kinetics of an isogenic ploidy series derived from an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. J Ferment Bioeng 83:253-260. doi:10.1016/ S0922-338X(97)80988-9
49. Schenberg-Frascino A, Moustacchi E (1972) Lethal and mutagenic effects of elevated temperature on haploid yeast. I. Variations in sensitivity during the cell cycle. Mol Gen Genet 115:243-257
50. Shima J, Takagi H (2009) Stress-tolerance of baker's-yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells: stress-protective molecules and genes involved in stress tolerance. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 53:155-164. doi:10.1042/BA20090029
51. Slater ML (1973) Effect of reversible inhibition of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis on the yeast cell cycle. J Bacteriol 113:263-270
52. Sumner ER, Avery SV (2002) Phenotypic heterogeneity: differential stress resistance among individual cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 148:345-351
53. Sumner ER, Avery AM, Houghton JE, Robins RA, Avery SV (2003) Cell cycle- and age-dependent activation of Sod1p drives the formation of stress resistant cell subpopulations within clonal yeast cultures. Mol Microbiol 50:857-870. doi:10.1046/j.1365- 2958.2003.03715.x
54. Vicente MA, Fietto LG, Castro IM, Santos ANG, Coutrim MX, Brandão RL (2006) Isolation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains producing higher levels of flavoring compounds for production of "cachaça" the Brazilian sugarcane spirit. Int J Food Microbiol 108:51-59. doi:10.1016/j. ijfoodmicro.2005.10.018
55. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR (2009) How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet 42:27-81. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306. 130206
56. Westmoreland TJ, Marks JR, Olson JA Jr, Thompson EM, Resnick MA, Bennett CB (2004) Cell cycle progression in G1 and S phases is CCR4 dependent following ionizing radiation or replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 3:430-446. doi:10.1128/EC.3.2.430-446.2004