How does yeast respond to pressure?

Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1239-1245

  Fernandes, P M B ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ESPÍRITO SANTO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Gene expression; High hydrostatic pressure; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Stress adaptation

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; NITRIC OXIDE; NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE;

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CELL CYCLE; CELL METABOLISM; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; INCUBATION TIME; NONHUMAN; PHASE TRANSITION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN POLYMERIZATION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST CELL;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 23844484832     PISSN: 0100879X     EISSN: 1414431X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000800012     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Haney S, Xu J, Lee Sy et al. (2001). Genetic selection in Saccharomyces of mutant mammalian adenylyl cyclases with elevated basal activities. Molecular and General Genetics, 265: 1120-1128.
2. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H et al. (1996). Life with 6000 genes. Science, 274: 546-567.
3. University of Wales Aberystwyth. The MCS site. Chandler D Semiotics for beginners [http://www.abu.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/]. Accessed October 26, 2004.
4. Fernandes PMB, Domitrovic T, Kao CM et al. (2004). Genome expression pattern in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in response to high hydrostatic pressure. FEBS Letters, 556: 153-160.
5. Gross M & Jaenicke R (1994). Proteins under pressure. The influence of high hydrostatic pressure on structure, function and assembly of proteins and protein complexes. European Journal of Biochemistry, 221: 617-630.
6. Lammi MJ, Elo MA, Sironen RK et al. (2004). Hydrostatic pressure-induced changes in cellular protein synthesis. Biorheology, 41: 309-313.
7. Iwahashi H, Fujii S, Obuchi K et al. (1993). Hydrostatic pressure is like high temperature and oxidative stress in the damage it causes to yeast. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 108: 53-58.
8. Fernandes PMB, Farina M & Kurtenbach E (2001). Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the morphology and ultrastructure of wild-type and trehalose synthase mutant cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 32: 42-46.
9. Craig EA (1992). The heat shock response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Jones EW, Pringle JR & Broach JR (Editors), The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. Vol. 2. Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
10. Lew DJ, Weinert T & Pringle JR (1992). Cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Jones EW, Pringle JR & Broach JR (Editors), The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. Vol. 1. Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
11. Wheals AE (1987). Biology of the cell cycle in yeasts. In: Rose AH & Harrison JS (Editors), The Yeasts. Academic Press Inc., London, UK.
12. Palhano FL, Gomes HL, Orlando MTD et al. (2004). Pressure response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: from cellular to molecular approaches. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 50: 447-457.
13. Silva JL & Weber P (1993). Pressure stability of proteins. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 44: 89-113.
14. Silva JL, Foguel D & Royer CA (2001). Pressure provides new insights into protein folding, dynamics and structure. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 26: 612-618.
15. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM et al. (2000). Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 11: 4241-4257.
16. Piper PW (1997). The yeast heat shock response. In: Mager WH & Hohmann S (Editors), Yeast Stress Response. R.G. Landes Company, Austin, TX, USA.
17. Fernandes PMB, Panek AD & Kurtenbach E (1997). Effect of hydrostatic pressure on a mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deleted in the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 152: 17-21.
18. Fujii S, Iwahashi H, Obuchi K et al. (1996). Characterization of a barotolerant mutant of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: importance of trehalose content and membrane fluidity. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 141: 97-101.
19. Iwahashi H, Obuchi K, Fujii S et al. (1997). Barotolerance is dependent on both trehalose and heat-shock protein 104 but is essentially different from thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 25: 43-47.
20. Iwahashi H, Obuchi K, Fujii S et al. (1997). Effect of temperature and the role of Hsp104 and trehalose in barotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Letters, 416: 1-5.
21. Singer MA & Lindquist S (1998). Thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the Yin and Yang of trehalose. Trends in Biotechnology, 16: 460-468.
22. Komatsu Y, Obuchi K, Iwahashi H et al. (1991). Deuterium oxide, dimethylsulfoxide and heat shock confer protection against hydrostatic pressure damage in yeast. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 174: 1141-1147.
23. Mentré P, Hamraoui L, Hui Bon Hoa G et al. (1999). Pressure-sensitivity of endoplasmic reticulum membrane and nucleolus as revealed by electron microscopy. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 45: 353-362.
24. Motshwene P, Karreman R, Kgari G et al. (2004). LEA (late embryonic abundant)-like protein Hsp 12 (heat-shock protein 12) is present in the cell wall and enhances the barotolerance of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry Journal, 377: 769-774.
25. Sales K, Brandt W, Rumbak E et al. (2000). The LEA-like protein HSP12 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a plasma membrane location and protects membranes against desiccation and ethanol-induced stress. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1463: 267-278.
26. Weber G & Drickamer HG (1983). The effect of high pressure upon proteins and other biomolecules. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 16: 89-112.
27. Mentré P & Hui Bon Hoa G (2001). Effects of high hydrostatic pressures on living cells: A consequence of the properties of macromolecules and macromolecule-associated water. International Review of Cytology, 201: 1-84.
28. Quinn PJ, Joo F & Vigh L (1989). The role of unsaturated lipids in membrane structure and stability. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 53: 71-103.
29. Bartlett DH (2002). Pressure effects on in vivo microbial processes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1595: 367-381.
30. Yale J & Bohnert HJ (2001). Transcript expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at high salinity. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276: 15996-16007.
31. Cartwright CP, Veazey FJ & Rose AH (1987). Effect of ethanol on activity of the plasma-membrane ATPase and accumulation of glycine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Genetic Microbiology, 133: 857-865.
32. Sahara T, Goda T & Ohgiya S (2002). Comprehensive expression analysis of time-dependent genetic responses in yeast cells to low temperature. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277: 50015-50021.
33. Perrier-Cornet JM, Hayert M & Gervais P (1999). Yeast cell mortality related to a high-pressure shift: occurrence of cell membrane permeabilization. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 87: 1-7.
34. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S et al. (2001). Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Letters, 498: 98-103.
35. Bard M, Bruner DA, Pierson CA et al. (1996). Cloning and characterization of ERG25, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene encoding C-4 sterol methyl oxidase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93: 186-190.
36. Swan TM & Watson K (1998). Stress tolerance in a yeast sterol auxotroph: role of ergosterol, heat shock proteins and trehalose. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 169: 191-197.
37. Beney L, Perrier-Cornet JM, Hayert M et al. (1997). Shape modification of phospholipid vesicles induced by high pressure: influence of bilayer compressibility. Biophysical Journal, 72: 1258-1263.
38. Bartlett DH, Kato C & Horikoshi K (1995). High pressure influences on gene and protein expression. Research in Microbiology, 146: 697-706.
39. Takahashi K, Kubo T, Kobayashi K et al. (1997). Hydrostatic pressure influences mRNA expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 and heat shock protein 70 in chondrocyte-like cell line. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 15: 150-158.
40. Foguel D & Silva JL (1994). Cold denaturation of a repressor-operator complex: the role of entropy in protein-DNA recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91: 8244-8247.
41. Mohana-Borges R, Pacheco AB, Sousa FJ et al. (2000). LexA repressor forms stable dimers in solution. The role of specific DNA in tightening protein-protein interactions. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275: 4708-4712.
42. Iwahashi H, Kaul SC, Obuchi K et al. (1991). Induction of barotolerance by heat shock treatment in yeast. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 80: 325-328.
43. Piper PW (1993). Molecular events associated with acquisition of heat tolerance by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 11: 339-355.
44. Palhano FL, Orlando MTD & Fernandes PMB (2004). Induction of baroresistance by hydrogen peroxide, ethanol and cold-shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 233: 139-145.
45. Costa V, Reis E, Quintanilha A et al. (1993). Acquisition of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The key role of the mitochondrial superoxide dismutase. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 300: 608-614.
46. Costa V & Moradas-Ferreira P (2001). Oxidative stress and signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: insights into ageing, apoptosis and diseases. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 22: 217-246.
47. Haslbeck M, Walke S, Stromer T et al. (1999). Hsp26: a temperature-regulated chaperone. EMBO Journal, 18: 6744-6751.
48. Landau JV (1967). Induction, transcription and translation in Escherichia coli: a hydrostatic pressure study. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 149: 506-512.
49. Gross M & Jaenicke R (1990). Pressure-induced dissociation of tight couple ribosomes. FEBS Letters, 267: 239-241.
50. Gross M, Lehle K, Jaenicke R et al. (1993). Pressure-induced dissociation of ribosomes and elongation cycle intermediates. Stabilizing conditions and identification of the most sensitive functional state. European Journal of Biochemistry, 218: 463-468.
51. Abe F, Kato C & Horikoshi K (1999). Pressure-regulated metabolism in microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology, 7: 447-453.
52. Seymour IJ & Piper PW (1999). Stress induction of HSP30, the plasma membrane heat shock protein gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, appears not to use known stress-regulated transcription factors. Microbiology, 145: 231-239.
53. Monkada S, Palmer RMJ & Higgs EA (1991). Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. Pharmacological Reviews, 43: 109-141.
54. Chiang KT, Shinyashiki M, Switzer CH et al. (2000). Effects of nitric oxide on the copper-responsive transcription factor Ace1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cytotoxic and cytoprotective actions of nitric oxide. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 377: 296-303.
55. Domitrovic T, Palhano FL, Barja-Fidalgo C et al. (2003). Role of nitric oxide in the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to heat shock and high hydrostatic pressure. FEMS Yeast Research, 3: 341-346.