Induction of baroresistance by hydrogen peroxide, ethanol and cold-shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

FEMS Microbiology Letters

Volumn 233, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 139-145

  Palhano, Fernando L ^a   Orlando, Marcos T D ^a   Fernandes, Patricia M B ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ESPÍRITO SANTO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cold shock; Ethanol; Hydrogen peroxide; Hydrostatic pressure; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Stress

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; COLD TREATMENT; GENE CONTROL; GENE INDUCTION; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; IMMOBILIZATION STRESS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TIME; UPREGULATION; YEAST CELL;

ACTINS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; COLD; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; ETHANOL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TIME FACTORS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 1642293201     PISSN: 03781097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Siderius M., Mager W.H. General stress response: in search of a common denominator. Mager W.H., Hohmann S. Yeast Stress Response. 1997;214-230 R.G. Company, Texas, USA.
2. Coote P.J., Cole M.B., Jones M.V. Induction of increased thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae may be triggered by a mechanism involving intracellular pH. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137:1991;1701-1708.
3. Jamieson D.J. Saccharomyces cerevisiae has distinct adaptive responses to both hydrogen peroxide and menadione. J. Bacteriol. 174:1992;6678-6681.
4. Rothschild L.J., Mancinelli R.L. Life in extreme environments. Nature. 409:2001;1092-1101.
5. Molina-Garcia A.D. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on biological systems. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 19:2002;3-53.
6. Zimmerman A.M. High pressure studies in cell biology. Int. Rev. Cytol. 30:1971;1-47.
7. Heremans K.A.H. High pressure effects upon proteins and other biomolecules. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 11:1982;1-21.
8. Landau J.V. Hydrostatic pressure on the biosynthesis of macromolecules. Zimmerman A.M. High Pressure Effects on Cellular Processes. 1970;45-70 Academic Press, New York.
9. Fernandes P.M.B., Farina M., Kurtenbach E. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the morphology and ultrastructure of wild-type and trehalose synthase mutant cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 32:2001;42-46.
10. Fernandes P.M.B., Domitrovic T., Kao C.M., Kurtenbach E. Genome expression pattern in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in response to high hydrostatic presssure. FEBS Lett. 556:2004;153-160.
11. Iwahashi H., Kaul S.C., Obuch K., Komatsu Y. Induction of barotolerance by heat shock treatment in yeast. FEMS Micribiol. Lett. 80:1991;325-328.
12. Fernandes P.M.B., Panek A.D., Kurtenbach E. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on a mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deleted in the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene. FEMS Micribiol. Lett. 152:1997;17-21.
13. Orlando, M.T.D. (1999) Comparação entre o efeito da pressão química e a pressão externa hidrostática em supercondutores do tipo (Hg, Re)-1223. Doctor Thesis, CBPF, Brasil
14. Fernandes A.A., Santamarina J., Bud'ko S.L., Nakamura O., Guimpel J., Schuller I.K. Effect of physical and chemical pressure on the superconductivity of high-temperature oxide superconductors. Phys. Rev. B. 44:1991;7601-7606.
15. Costa V., Moradas-Ferreira P. Oxidative stress and signal transduction in of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: insights into ageing, apoptosis and diseases. Mol. Aspects Med. 22:2001;217-246.
16. Davies J.M.S., Lowry C.V., Davies K.J.A. Transient adaptation to oxidative stress in yeast. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 317:1995;1-6.
17. Iwahashi H., Fujii S., Obuchi K., Kaul S., Sato A., Komatsu Y. Hydrostatic pressure is like high temperature and oxidative stress in the damage it causes to yeast. FEMS Micribiol. Lett. 108:1993;53-58.
18. Gasch A.P., Spellman P.T., Kao C.M., Carmel-Harel O., Eisen M.B., Storz G., Botstein D., Brown P.O. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:2000;4241-4257.
19. Jamieson D.J. Oxidative stress responses of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 14:1998;1511-1527.
20. Penninckx M.J. An overview on glutathione in Saccharomyces versus non-conventional yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2:2002;295-305.
21. Jones R.P. Biological principles for the effects of ethanol. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11:1989;130-153.
22. Mentré P., Hui Bon Hoa G. Effects of high hydrostatic pressures on living cells: a consequence of the properties of macromolecules and macromolecule-associated water. Int. Rev. Cytol. 201:2001;1-84.
23. Costa V., Reis E., Quintanilha A., Moradas-Ferreira P. Acquisition of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the key role of the mitochondrial superoxide dismutase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 300:1993;608-614.
24. Alexandre H., Ansanay-Galeote V., Dequim S., Blondin B. Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 498:2001;98-103.
25. Piper P.W. The heat shock and ethanol stress responses of yeast exhibit extensive similarity and functional overlap. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 134:1995;121-127.
26. Chi Z., Arneborg N. Relationship between lipid composition, frequency of ethanol-induced respiratory deficient mutants, and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Appl. Microbiol. 86:1999;1047-1052.
27. Herrero A.A., Gomez R.F., Roberts M.F. Ethanol-induced changes in the membrane lipid composition of Clostridium thermocellum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 693:1982;195-204.
28. Alexandre H., Rousseaux I., Charpentier C. Relationship between ethanol tolerance lipid composition and plasma membrane fluidity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 124:1994;17-22.
29. Kajiwara S., Shirai A., Fujii T., Toguri T., Nakamura K., Ohtaguchi K. Polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: expression of ethanol tolerance and the FAD2 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1996;4309-4313.
30. You K.M., Rosenfield C.-L, Knipple D.C. Ethanol tolerance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on cellular oleic acid content. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:2003;1499-1503.
31. Sajbidor J., Grego J. Fatty acid alterations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to ethanol stress. FEMS Micribiol. Lett. 93:1992;13-16.
32. Alexandre H., Rousseaux I., Charpentier C. Ethanol adaptation mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 20:1994;173-183.
33. Noma S., Hayakawa I. Barotolerance of Staphylococcus aureus is increased by incubation at below 0°C prior to hydrostatic pressure treatment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 80:2003;261-264.
34. Graig E.A. The heat shock response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Jones E.W., Pringle J.R., Broach J.R. Gene Expression. vol. 2:1992;501-537 Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour, NY.
35. Piper P.W. The yeast heat shock response. Mager W.H., Hohmann S. Yeast Stress Response. 1997;75-99 R.G. Company, Texas, USA.
36. Sahara T., Goda T., Ohgiya S. Comprehensive expression analysis of time-dependent genetic responses in yeast cells to low temperature. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;50015-50021.
37. Iwahashi H., Shimizu H., Odani M., Komatsu Y. Piezophysiology of genome wide gene expression levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Extremophiles. 7:2003;291-298.
38. Yale J., Bohnert H.J. Transcript expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in high salinity. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2000;15996-16007.
39. Quinn P.J., Joo F., Vigh L. The role of unsaturated lipids in membrane structure and stability. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 53:1989;71-103.
40. Zhang S., Skalsky Y., Garfinkel D.J. MAG2 or SPT23 is required for transcription of the Δ9 fatty acid desaturase gene, OLE1, and nuclear membrane integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 151:1999;473-483.
41. Ito T., Chiba T., Ozawa R., Yoshida M., Hattori M., Sakaki Y. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 10:2001;4569-4574.
42. Abe F., Horikoshi K. Hydrostatic pressure promotes acidification of vacuoles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 130:1995;307-312.