Towards personality-based user adaptation: Psychologically informed stylistic language generation

User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 227-278

  Mairesse, François ^a   Walker, Marilyn A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

Author keywords

Big Five traits; Dialogue; Individual differences; Linguistic style; Natural language generation; Personality; Recommendation

Indexed keywords

BIG FIVE; DIALOGUE; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION; PERSONALITY; RECOMMENDATION;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 78049530223     PISSN: 09241868     EISSN: 15731391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-010-9076-2     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. Aaker, J.L.: The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. J. Mark. Res. 36(1), 45-57 (1999)
2. Allport, G.W., Odbert, H.S.: Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychol. Monogr. 47(1, Whole No. 211), 171-220 (1936)
3. André, E., Rist, T., van Mulken, S., Klesen, M., Baldes, S.: The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In: Prevost, S., Cassell, J.S.J., Churchill, E. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 220-255. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
4. Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M., Torasso, P.: Intrigue: personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and hand held devices. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17(8), 687-714 (2003)
5. Argamon, S., Dhawle, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J.W.: Lexical predictors of personality type. In: Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting of the Interface and the Classification Society of North America, St. Louis, MO (2005)
6. Ball, G., Breese, J.: Emotion and personality in a conversational character. In: Proceedings of theWorkshop on Embodied Conversational Characters, pp. 83-86. Lake Tahoe, CA (1998)
7. Beaman, K.: Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken andwritten narrative discourse. In: Tannen, D., Freedle, R. (eds.) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, pp. 45-80. Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1984)
8. Belz, A.: Statistical generation: Three methods compared and evaluated. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 15-23. Aberdeen (2005)
9. Belz, A.: Automatic generation of weather forecast texts using comprehensive probabilistic generationspace models. Nat. Lang. Eng. 14(4), 431-455 (2008)
10. Bouayad-Agha, N., Scott, D.R., Power, R.: Integrating content and style in documents: A case study of patient information leaflets. Inf. Des. J. 9(2-3), 161-176 (2000)
11. Bouchard, T.J., McGue, M.: Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. J. Neurobiol. 54, 4-45 (2003)
12. Brennan, S.E.: Conversations with and through computers. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 1, 67-86 (1991)
13. Brennan, S.E.: Lexical entrainment in spontaneous dialog. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue. pp. 41-44. Philadelphia, PA (1996)
14. Brennan, S.E., Clark, H.H.: Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22, 1482-1493 (1996)
15. Brennan, S., Ohaeri, J.: Effects of message style on users' attributions toward agents. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 281-282. Boston, MA (1994)
16. Brennan, S., Ohaeri, J.: Why do electronic conversations seem less polite? The costs and benefits of hedging. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities, Coordination, and Collaboration, pp. 227-235. San Francisco, CA (1999)
17. Brockmann, C.: Personality and Alignment Processes in Dialogue: Towards a Lexically-Based Unified Model. PhD thesis, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh (2009)
18. Brown, P., Levinson, S.: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
19. Byrne, D., Nelson, D.: Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1, 659-663 (1965)
20. Cahn, J.E.: The Generation of Affect in Synthesized Speech. J. Am. Voice I/O Soc. 8, 1-19 (1990)
21. Carberry, S.: Plan recognition and its use in understanding dialogue. In: Kobsa, A.,Wahlster,W. (eds.) User Models in Dialogue Systems, pp. 133-162. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1989)
22. Carenini, G., Moore, J.D.: A strategy for generating evaluative arguments. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pp. 47-54. Mitzpe Ramon, Israel (2000)
23. Carenini, G., Moore, J.D.: Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments. Artif. Intel. J. 170(11), 925-952 (2006)
24. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T.: Negotiated collusion: Modeling social language and its relationship effects in intelligent agents. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 13, 89-132 (2003)
25. Chklovski, T., Pantel, P.: verbocean: Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 33-40. Barcelona (2004)
26. Cohen, P.R., Perrault, C.R., Allen, J.F.: Beyond question answering. In: Lehnert, W., Ringle, M. (eds.) Strategies for Natural Language Processing, pp. 245-274. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1982)
27. Cope, C.: Linguistic structure and personality development. J. Couns. Psychol. 16, 1-19 (1969)
28. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL (1992)
29. Darves, C., Oviatt, S.: Adaptation of users' spoken dialogue patterns in a conversational interface. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), pp. 561-564. Denver, CO (2002)
30. Department of the Army: Police intelligence operations. Field Manual FM 3-19.50. Appendix D: Tactical Questioning (2006)
31. Dewaele, J.-M., Furnham, A.: Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Lang. Learn. 49(3), 509-544 (1999)
32. Di Eugenio, B., Moore, J.D., Paolucci, M.: Learning features that predict cue usage. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 80-87. Madrid (1997)
33. DiMarco, C., Hirst, G.: A computational theory of goal-directed style in syntax. Comput. Liguist. 19(3), 451-499 (1993)
34. Dunn, G., Wiersema, J., Ham, J., Aroyo, L.: Evaluating interface variants on personality acquisition for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pp. 259-270. Trento (2009)
35. Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J., Barrett, P.: A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Pers. Indivd. Differ. 6(1), 21-29 (1985)
36. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1998)
37. Fennis, B.M., Pruyn, A.T.H.: You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation. J. Bus. Res. 60(6), 634-639 (2007)
38. Finin, T.W., Joshi, A.K., Webber, B.L.: Natural language interactions with artificial experts. Proc. IEEE 74(7), 921-938 (1986)
39. Fink, J., Kobsa, A.: Review and analysis of commercial user modeling servers for personalization on the world wide web. User Model User-Adap. Inter. 10(2), 209-249 (2000)
40. Fleischman M., Hovy E.: Towards emotional variation in speech-based natural language generation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pp. 57-64, Harriman, NY (2002)
41. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.J.: Investigating human tutor responses to student uncertainty for adaptive system development. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.4738, pp. 678-689 (2007)
42. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.J., Rotaru, M.: Responding to student uncertainty during computer tutoring: an experimental evaluation. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.5091, pp. 60-69 (2008)
43. Furnham, A.: Language and personality. In: Giles, H., Robinson, W. (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, Winley, UK (1990)
44. Furnham, A. , Jackson, C.J., Miller, T.: Personality, learning style and work performance. Pers. Individ. Differ. 27, 1113-1122 (1999)
45. Giles, H., Coupland, N., Coupland, J. : Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In: Giles, H., Coupland, N., Coupland, J. (eds.) Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, chap. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
46. Gill, A.J., Oberlander, J.: Perception of e-mail personality at zero-acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; neuroticism is a worry. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 456-461, Boston, MA (2003)
47. Gill, A.J., Harrison, A.J., Oberlander, J.: Interpersonality: Individual differences and interpersonal priming. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 464-469. Chicago, IL (2004)
48. Goldberg, L.R.: An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216-1229 (1990)
49. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37, 504-528 (2003)
50. Green, S. J., DiMarco, C.: Stylistic decision-making in natural language generation. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Trends in Natural Language Generation An Artificial Intelligence Perspective, vol.1036, pp. 125-143 (1996)
51. Grosz B.J.: TEAM: A transportable natural language interface system. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 39-45, Santa Monica, CA (1983)
52. Gupta, S., Walker, M.A., Romano, D.M.: Howrude are you?: Evaluating politeness and affect in interaction. In: Proceedings of ACII, pp. 203-217. Lisbon (2007)
53. Gupta, S., Walker,M.A., Romano, D.M.: POLLy: Aconversational system that uses a shared, representation to generate action and social language. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP), pp. 203-217. Hyderabad (2008)
54. Hayes-Roth, B., Brownston, L.: Multiagent collaboration in directed improvisation. Technical Report KSL 94-169, Knowledge Systems Laboratory. Stanford University (1994)
55. Heylighen, F., Dewaele, J.-M.: Variation in the contextuality of language: An empirical measure. Context Context Spec. Issue Found. Sci. 7(3), 293-340 (2002)
56. Higashinaka, R., Walker, M.A., Prasad, R.: An unsupervised method for learning generation lexicons for spoken dialogue systems by mining user reviews. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process. 4(4), 8 (2007)
57. Hirschberg, J.: Speaking more like you: Lexical, acoustic/prosodic, and discourse entrainment in spoken dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 128. Columbus, OH (2008)
58. Hovy, E.: Generating Natural Language Under Pragmatic Constraints. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, USA (1988)
59. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 168-177. Seattle, WA (2004)
60. Hubal, R.C., Kizakevich, P.N., Guinn, C.I., Merino, K.D., West, S.L.: The virtual standardized patient: Simulated patient-practitioner dialogue for patient interview training. In: Westwood, J.D.,Hoffman, H.M., Mogel, G.T., Robb, R.A., Stredney, D. (eds.) Envisioning Healing: Interactive Technology and the Patient-Practitioner Dialogue, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)
61. Infante, D.A.: Teaching students to understand and control verbal aggression. Commun. Edu. 44(1), 51-63 (1995)
62. Inkpen, D.Z., Hirst, G.: Near-synonym choice in natural language generation. In: Nicolov, N., Bontcheva, K., Angelova, G., Mitkov, R. (eds.)Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing III, pp. 141-152. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (2004)
63. Isard, A., Brockmann, C., Oberlander, J.: Individuality and alignment in generated dialogues. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG), pp. 22-29. Sydney (2006)
64. Isbister, K., Nass, C.: Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 53(2), 251-267 (2000)
65. John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., Kentle, R.L.: The "Big Five" Inventory: Versions 4a and 5b. Technical report. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research (1991)
66. John, O.P., Srivastava, S.: The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin, L.A., John, O.P. (eds.) Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, Guilford Press, New York (1999)
67. Kittredge, R., Korelsky, T., Rambow, O.: On the need for domain communication knowledge. Comput. Intell. 7(4), 305-314 (1991)
68. Kobsa, A.: Personalized hypermedia and international privacy. Commun. ACM 45(5), 64-67 (2002)
69. Kobsa, A., Wahlster, W. (eds.): User Models in Dialog Systems. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1989)
70. Krippendorf, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA (1980)
71. Lakoff, R.: Language and woman's place. Lang. Soc. 2, 45-79 (1973a)
72. Lakoff, R.: The logic of politeness; or, minding your P's and Q's. In: Papers from the 9th Regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 292-305. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL (1973b)
73. Langkilde, I., Knight, K.: Generation that exploits corpus-based statistical knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp.704-710. Montreal (1998)
74. Langkilde-Geary, I.: An empirical verification of coverage and correctness for a general-purpose sentence generator. In: Proceedings of the InternationalConference on NaturalLanguage Generation, pp. 17-24. Harriman, NY (2002)
75. Lavoie, B., Rambow, O.: A fast and portable realizer for text generation systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 265-268. Washington, D.C. (1997)
76. Lester, J.C., Stone, B., Stelling, G.: Lifelike pedagogical agents for mixed-initiative problem solving in constructivist learning environments. User Model. User-Adapt. Inter. 9(1-2), 1-44 (1999a)
77. Lester, J.C., Towns, S.G., Fitzgerald, P.J.: Achieving affective impact: Visual emotive communication in lifelike pedagogical agents. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu. 10(3-4), 278-291 (1999)
78. Levelt, W.J.M., Kelter, S.: Surface form and memory in question answering. Cogn. Psychol. 14, 78-106 (1982)
79. Lin, J.: Using distributional similarity to identify individual verb choice. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Natural Language Generation Conference, pp. 33-40. Sydney (2006)
80. Litman, D.J., Allen, J.E.: A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversations. Cogn. Sci. 11, 163-200 (1987)
81. Loyall, A.B., Bates, J.: Behavior-based language generation for believable agents. Technical Report CMU-CS-95-139. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (1995)
82. Mairesse, F.: Learning to Adapt in Dialogue Systems: Data-driven Models for Personality Recognition and Generation. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield (2008)
83. Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A.: PERSONAGE: Personality generation for dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 45th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 496-503. Prague (2007)
84. Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A.: A personality-based framework for utterance generation in dialogue applications. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior. Palo Alto, CA (2008a)
85. Mairesse, F.,Walker,M.A.: Trainable generation of Big-Five personality styles through data-driven parameter estimation. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 165-173. Columbus, OH (2008b)
86. Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A., Mehl, M.R., Moore, R.K.: Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 30, 457-500 (2007)
87. Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory. Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3), 243-281 (1988)
88. Marcu, D.: Building up rhetorical structure trees. In: Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), vol.2, pp. 1069-1074. Portland, OR (1996)
89. Marcus, D.K., Lilienfeld, S.O., Edens, J.F., Poythress, N.G.: Is antisocial personality disorder continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis. Psychol. Med. 36(11), 1571-1582 (2006)
90. Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Façade: An experiment in building a fully-realized interactive drama. In: Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, Game Design track. San Jose, CA (2003)
91. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 81-90 (1987)
92. Mehl, M.R., Gosling, S.D., Pennebaker, J.W.: Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 862-877 (2006)
93. Melčuk, I.A.: Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York, Albany, NY (1988)
94. Moore, J.D., Paris, C.L.: Planning text for advisory dialogues: Capturing intentional and rhetorical information. Comput. Linguist. 19(4), 651-694 (1993)
95. Moser, M.G., Moore J.D.: Investigating cue selection and placement in tutorial discourse. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 130-137. Cambridge, MA (1995)
96. Mott, B., Lester, J.: U-director: A decision-theoretic narrative planning architecture for storytelling environments. In: Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on Autonomous agents andmultiagent systems, pp. 977-984. Hakodate, Japan (2006)
97. Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The Free Press, New York (1997)
98. Nass, C., Lee, K.: Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. J. Exper. Psychol.: Appl. 7(3), 171-181 (2001)
99. Nenkova, A., Gravano, A., Hirschberg, J.: High frequency word entrainment in spoken dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 169-172. Columbus, OH (2008)
100. Niederhoffer, K.G., Pennebaker, J.W.: Linguistic style matching in social interaction. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 21, 337-360 (2002)
101. Norman, W.T.: Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 66, 574-583 (1963)
102. Nowson, S.: The Language of Weblogs: A study of genre and individual differences. PhD thesis, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh (2006)
103. Oberlander, J., Gill, A.J.: Individual differences and implicit language: Personality, parts-of-speech, and pervasiveness. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1035-1040. Chicago, IL (2004a)
104. Oberlander, J., Gill, A.J.: Language generation and personality: Two dimensions, two stages, two hemispheres?. In: Proceedings from the AAAI Spring Symposium on Architectures for Modeling Emotion: Cross-Disciplinary Foundations, pp. 104-111. Palo Alto, CA (2004b)
105. Oberlander, J., Gill, A.J.: Language with character: A stratified corpus comparison of individual differences in e-mail communication. Discourse Proces. 42, 239-270 (2006)
106. Oberlander, J., Nowson, S.: Whose thumb is it anyway? Classifying author personality from weblog text. In: Proceedings of the 44th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 627-634. Sydney (2006)
107. Paiva, D.S., Evans, R.: Empirically-based control of natural language generation. In: Proceedings of the 43rd AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 58-65. Ann Arbor, MI (2005)
108. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 79-86. Philadelphia, PA (2002)
109. Paris, C., Scott, D.R.: Stylistic variation inmultilingual instructions. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 45-52. Kennebunkport, MN (1994)
110. Peabody, D., Goldberg, L.R.: Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptor. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57(3), 552-567 (1989)
111. Pennebaker, J.W., King, L.A.: Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 7, 1296-1312 (1999)
112. Pickering, M., Garrod, S.: Towards a mechanistic theory of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 169-226 (2004)
113. Piwek, P.: A flexible pragmatics-driven language generator for animated agents. In: Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pp. 151-154. Budapest (2003)
114. Plummer, J.T.: How personality makes a difference. J. Advert. Res. 24, 27-31 (1984)
115. Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mellish, C.: Modelling politeness in natural language generation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pp. 141-150. Sydney (2004)
116. Power, R.:A Computer Model of Conversation. PhD thesis, Department of Machine Intelligence, University of Edinburgh (1974)
117. Power, R., Scott, D.R., Bouayad-Agha, N.: Generating texts with style. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.2588, pp. 93-105 (2003)
118. Prince, E., Frader, J., Bosk, C. : On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In: Di Pietro, R.J. (ed.) Linguistics and the Professions, pp. 83-97. Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1982)
119. Rambow, O., Rogati, M., Walker, M.A.: Evaluating a trainable sentence planner for a spoken dialogue travel system. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 434-441. Toulouse (2001)
120. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996)
121. Rehm, M., André, E.: From annotated multimodal corpora to simulated human-like behaviors. In: Modeling Communications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.4930, pp. 1-17 (2008)
122. Reiter, E., Dale, R.: Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
123. Reiter, E., Sripada, S.: Human variation and lexical choice. Comput. Linguist. 28, 545-553 (2002)
124. Reitter, D., Keller, F., Moore, J.D.: Computational modelling of structural priming in dialogue. In: Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference - North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL), pp. 121-124. New York City, NY (2006)
125. Revelle, W.: Personality processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46, 295-328 (1991)
126. Riloff, E., Wiebe, J., Phillips, W.: Exploiting subjectivity classification to improve information extraction. In: Proceedings of the National Conference On Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1106-1111. Pittsburgh, PA (2005)
127. Rushton, J.P., Murray, H.G., Erdle, S.: Combining trait consistency and learning specificity approaches to personality, with illustrative data on faculty teaching performance. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 8, 59-66 (1987)
128. Ruttkay, Z., Dormann, C., Noot, H.: Embodied conversational agents on a common ground. In: Ruttkay, Z., Pelachaud, C. (eds.) From Brows to Trust: Evaluating Embodied Conversational Agents, chap. 2, pp. 27-66. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA (2004)
129. Scherer, K.R.: Personality markers in speech. In: Scherer, K.R., Giles,H. Social Markers in Speech, pp. 147-209. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)
130. Scherer, K.R.: Vocal indicators of stress. In: Darby, J. (ed.) Speech Evaluation in Psychiatry, pp. 171-187. Grune & Stratton, New York (1981)
131. Schober, M.F., Brennan, S.E.: Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In: Graesser, A.C., Gernsbacher, M.A., Goldman, S.R. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Processes, pp. 123-164. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (2003)
132. Scott, D.R., de Souza, C.S. : Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In: Dale, R., Mellish, C., Zock, M. (eds.) Current Research in Natural Language Generation, pp. 47-73. Academic Press, NY (1990)
133. Siegman, A.W.: The telltale voice: Nonverbal messages of verbal communication. In: Feldstein, S., Siegman, A.W. (eds.) Nonverbal Behavior and Communication, chap. 7, pp. 183-243. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1978)
134. Siegman, A.W., Pope, B.: Personality variables associated with productivity and verbal fluency in the initial interview. In: Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL (1965)
135. Slater, M., Pertaub, D.-P., Barker, C., Clark, D.: An experimental study on fear of public speaking using a virtual environment. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 9(5), 627-633 (2006)
136. Stenchikova, S., Stent, A.: Measuring adaptation between dialogs. Proceedings of the 8th SIG dial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 166-173 (2007)
137. Stent, A., Prasad, R., Walker, M.A.: Trainable sentence planning for complex information presentation in spoken dialog systems. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp.79-86. Barcelona (2004)
138. Tapus, A., Mataric, M.: Socially assistive robots: The link between personality, empathy, physiological signals, and task performance. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Emotion, Personality and Social Behavior, Palo Alto, CA (2008)
139. Thorne, A.: The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53, 718-726 (1987)
140. Traum, D., Roque, A., Georgiou, A.L.P., Gerten, J., Narayanan, B. M.S., Robinson, S.,Vaswani, A.: Hassan: A virtual human for tactical questioning. In: Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 71-74. Antwerp (2007)
141. Vogel, K.,Vogel, S.: L'interlangue et la personalité de l'apprenant. Int. J. Appl. Linguist. 24(1), 48-68 (1986)
142. Walker, M.A., Rambow, O.: Spoken language generation. Comput. Speech. Lang. Special Issue Spoken Lang. Gen. 16(3-4), 273-281 (2002)
143. Walker, M.A., Cahn, J.E., Whittaker, S.J.: Improvising linguistic style: Social and affective bases for agent personality. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 96-105. Marina Del Rey, CA (1997)
144. Walker, M.A., Rambow, O., Rogati, M.: Training a sentence planner for spoken dialogue using boosting. Comput Speech Lang 16(3-4) (2002)
145. Walker, M.A., Whittaker, S., Stent, A., Maloor, P., Moore, J.D., Johnston, M., Vasireddy, G.: Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue. Cogn. Sci. 28(5), 811-840 (2004)
146. Walker, M.A., Stent, A., Mairesse, F., Prasad, R.: Individual and domain adaptation in sentence planning for dialogue. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 30, 413-456 (2007)
147. Wang, N., Johnson,W.L., Mayer, R.E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., Collins, H.: The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning gains. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 125, 686-693 (2005)
148. Watson, D., Clark, L.A.: On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five factor model. J. Pers. 60(2), 441-476 (1992)
149. Weaver, J.B:.Personality and self-perceptions about communication. In:McCroksey, J.C., Daly, J.A., Martin, M.M., Beatty, M.J. (eds.) Communication and Personality: Trait perspectives, chap. 4, pp. 95-118. Hampton Press, NJ (1998)
150. Wiebe, J.: Recognizing subjective sentences: A computational investigation of narrative text. PhD thesis, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY (1990)
151. Wilkie, J., Jacka, M.A., Littlewood, P.J.: System-initiated digressive proposals in automated humancomputer telephone dialogues: The use of contrasting politeness strategies. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 62, 41-71 (2005)
152. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hwa, R.: Just how mad are you? Finding strong and weak opinion clauses. In: Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 761-769. San Jose, CA (2004)
153. Zukerman, I., Litman, D.J.: Natural language processing and usermodeling: Synergies and limitations.User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 11(1-2), 129-158 (2001)