An empirical verification of coverage and correctness for a general-purpose sentence generator

Proceedings of the International Natural Language Generation Conference, INLG 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Langkilde Geary, Irene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL MEASUREMENT; GENERATION SYSTEMS; HIGH QUALITY; MEASUREMENTS OF; TEST SETS; TREEBANKS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84883342561     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. S. Bangalore, O. Rambow, and S. Whittaker. 2000. Evaluation metrics for generation. In Proc. of 1st INLG.
2. J. Bateman. 1996. KPML development environment — multilingual linguistic resource development and sentence generation. Technical report, German Centre for Information Technology (GMD).
3. P.R. Clarkson and R. Rosenfeld. 1997. Statistical language modeling using the cmu-cambridge toolkit. In Proc. ESCA Eurospeech.
4. H. Daume, K. Knight, I. Langkilde-Geary, D. Marcu, and K. Yamada. 2002. Experiments using a statistical model of syntax. In submitted.
5. M. Elhadad and J. Robin. 1998. Surge: a comprehensive plug-in syntactic realization component for text generation. In http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/elhadad/pub.html, submitted.
6. M. Elhadad. 1993. FUF: The universal unifier—user manual, version 5.2. Technical Report CUCS-038-91, Columbia University.
7. J.Robin. 1994. Revision-based generation of natural language summaries providing historical background: corpus-based analysis, design, implementation and evaluation. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
8. K. Knight and V. Hatzivassiloglou. 1995. Two-level, many-paths generation. In Proc. ACL.
9. K. Knight, I. Chander, M. Haines, V. Hatzivassiloglou, E. Hovy, M. Iida, S. K. Luk, R. Whitney, and K. Yamada. 1995. Filling knowledge gaps in a broad-coverage MT system. In Proc. IJCAI.
10. I. Langkilde and K. Knight. 1998a. Generation that exploits corpus-based statistical knowledge. In Proc. COLING-ACL.
11. I. Langkilde and K. Knight. 1998b. The practical value of n-grams in generation. In Proc. International Natural Language Generation Workshop.
12. I. Langkilde. 2000. Forest-based statistical sentence generation. In Proc. NAACL.
13. B. Lavoie and O. Rambow. 1997. RealPro – a fast, portable sentence realizer. In ANLP’97.
14. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: the Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2).
15. M. Meteer. 1990. The Generation Gap - the problem of expressibility in text planning. Ph.D. thesis, U. of Massachusetts.
16. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W-J. Zhu. 2001. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. Technical Report RC22176, IBM Research Division.