A personality-based framework for utterance generation in dialogue applications

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-08-04, Issue , 2008, Pages 80-87

  Mairesse, François ^a   Walker, Marilyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSERS (OPTICAL); SPEECH; SPEECH PROCESSING; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS);

BIG FIVE; ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS; EXISTING SYSTEMS; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; INTERACTIVE NARRATIVE; PERSONALITY TRAITS; SOCIAL BEHAVIORS; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES; TECHNICAL REPORTS;

FLOW INTERACTIONS;

EID: 52449108970     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Allport, G. W., and Odbert, H. S. 1936. Trait names: a psycholexical study. Psychological Monographs 47(1, Whole No. 211):171-220.
2. Allport, G. W. 1960. Personality and social encounter. Boston, MA: Beacon.
3. André, E.; Rist, T.; van Mulken, S.; Kiesen, M.; and Baldes, S. 2000. The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In S. Prévost J. Cassell, J. S., and Churchill, E., eds., Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 220-255.
4. Bouayad-Agha, N.; Scott, D.; and Power, R. 2000. Integrating content and style in documents: a case study of patient information leaflets. Information Design Journal 9(2-3): 161-176.
5. Brown, P., and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
6. Cassell, J., and Bickmore, T. 2003. Negotiated collusion: Modeling social language and its relationship effects in intelligent agents. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13:89-132.
7. Chaplin, W. F.; Phillips, J. B.; Brown, J. D.; Clanton, N. R.; and Stein, J. L. 2000. Handshaking, gender, personality, and first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 19(1):110-117.
8. Dong, J. K.; Jin, T. H.; Cho, H. W.; and Oh, S. C. 1999. The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies. International Journal of Prosthodontics 12(1):9-19.
9. Doucet, C., and Stelmack, R. M. 1997. Movement time differentiates extraverts from introverts. Personality and Individual Differences 23(5):775-786.
10. Furnham, A. 1990. Language and personality. In Giles, H., and Robinson, W., eds., Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Winley.
11. Gill, A., and Oberlander, J. 2003. Perception of e-mail personality at zero-acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; neuroticism is a worry. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 456-461.
12. Goldberg, L. R. 1990. An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:1216-1229.
13. Gosling, S. D.; Rentfrow, P. J.; and Swann, W. B. 2003. A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37:504-528.
14. Gupta, S.; Walker, M.; and Romano, D. M. 2007. How rude are you?: Evaluating politeness and affect in interaction. In Proceedings of ACII, 203-217.
15. Higashinaka, R.; Prasad, R.; and Walker, M. 2006. Learning to Generate Naturalistic Utterances Using Reviews in Spoken Dialogue Systems. In Proceedings of ACL 2006.
16. Hovy, E. 1988. Generating Natural Language under Pragmatic Constraints. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Isard, A.; Brockmann, C.; and Oberlander, J. 2006. Individuality and alignment in generated dialogues. In Proceedings of the 4th International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG06), 22-29.
18. Isbister, K., and Nass, C. 2000. Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53(2):251-267.
19. Lavoie, B., and Rambow, O. 1997. A fast and portable realizer for text generation systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 265-268.
20. Mairesse, F., and Walker, M. 2007. PERSONAGE: Personality generation for dialogue. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 496-503.
21. Mateas, M., and Stern, A. 2003. Façade: An experiment in building a fully-realized interactive drama. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, Game Design track.
22. Mateas, M. 2007. The authoring bottleneck in creating Al-based interactive stories. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2007 Fall Symposium on Intelligent Narrative Technologies.
23. McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:81-90.
24. Norman, W. T. 1963. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66:574-583.
25. Pennebaker, J. W., and King, L. A. 1999. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:1296-1312.
26. Pieraccini, R., and Levin, E. 1995. A learning approach to natural language understanding. In Speech Recognition and Coding, New Advances and Trends, NATO ASI Series. Springer Verlag. 139-155.
27. Piwek, P. 2003. A flexible pragmatics-driven language generator for animated agents. In Proceedings of EACL.
28. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. 1996. The Media Equation. University of Chicago Press.
29. Reiter, E., and Dale, R. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press.
30. Riedl, M., and Young, R. M. 2004. An intent-driven planner for multi-agent story generation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems.
31. Scherer, K. R. 1979. Personality markers in speech. In Scherer, K. R., and Giles, H., eds., Social markers in speech. Cambridge University Press. 147-209.
32. Stent, A.; Prasad, R.; and Walker, M. 2004. Trainable sentence planning for complex information presentation in spoken dialog systems. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
33. Trouvain, J.; Schmidt, S.; Schröder, M.; Schmitz, M.; and Barry, W. J. 2006. Modelling personality features by changing prosody in synthetic speech. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody.
34. Walker, M., and Rambow, O. 2002. Spoken language generation. Computer Speech and Language, Special Issue on Spoken Language Generation 16(3-4):273-281.
35. Walker, M.; Cahn, J. E.; and Whittaker, S. J. 1997. Improvising linguistic style: Social and affective bases for agent personality. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Autonomous Agents, 96-105.
36. Wang, N.; Johnson, W. L.; Mayer, R. E.; Rizzo, P.; Shaw, E.; and Collins, H. 2005. The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning gains. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 125:686-693.
37. Watson, D., and Clark, L. A. 1992. On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five factor model. Journal of Personality 60(2):441-76.