Negotiated collusion: Modeling social language and its relationship effects in intelligent agents

User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 89-132

  Cassell, Justine ^a   Bickmore, Timothy ^a  

^a MIT MEDIA LAB   (United States)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Embodied conversational agent; Small talk; Social interface; Trust

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

SMALL TALK; USER MODELINGS (UM);

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 0037929605     PISSN: 09241868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024026532471     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andersen, P. and Guerrero, L.: 1998, The Bright Side of Relational Communication: Interpersonal Warmth as a Social Emotion. In: P. Andersen and L. Guerrero (eds.), Handbook of Communication and Emotion, New York: Academic Press, pp. 303-329.
2. Andre, E., Muller, J. and Rist, T.: 1996, The PPP Persona: A Multipurpose Animated Presentation Agent, Advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM Press, pp. 245-247.
3. Ardissono, L., Boella, G. and Lesmo, L.: 1999, Politeness and speech acts, Proceedings of the Workshop on Attitudes, Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction at the 7th International Conference on User Modeling (UM '99), Banff, Canada.
4. Argyle, M.:1990, The biological basis of rapport. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 297-300.
5. Bagchi, S., Biswas, G. and Kawamura, K.: 1996, Interactive task planning under uncertainty and goal changes. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 18, 157-167.
6. Ball, G. and Breese, J.: 2000, Emotion and Personality in a Conversational Agent. In: J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost and E. Churchill (eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 189-219.
7. Berscheid, E. and Reis, H.: 1998, Attraction and Close Relationships. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 193-281.
8. Beskow, J. and McGlashan, S.: 1997, Olga - A Conversational Agent with Gestures, Proceedings of the IJCAI'97 Workshop on Animated Interface Agents - Making them Intelligent, August 1997, Nagoya, Japan.
9. Brown, J.R. and Rogers, E.L.: 1991, Openness, Uncertainty and Intimacy: An epistemological reformulation. In: N. Coupland, H. Giles and J.M. Wiemann (eds.), Miscommunication and problematic talk, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 146-165.
10. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.: 1978, Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: E. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-311.
11. Brown, R. and Gilman, A.: 1972, The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: P. Giglioli (ed.), Language and Social Context, Harmondsworth: Penguin., pp. 252-282.
12. Brown, R. and Gilman, A.: 1989, Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18, 159-212.
13. Buck, R.: 1993, The spontaneous communication of interpersonal expectations. In: P.D. Blanck (ed.), Interpersonal expectations: Theory, research, and applications, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227-241.
14. Cassell, J. and Bickmore, T.: 2000, External Manifestations of Trustworthiness in the Interface. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 50-56.
15. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjalmsson, H. and Yan, H.,1999, Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: Rea, Proceedings of CHI 99 Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 520-527.
16. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Vilhjàlmsson, H. and Yan, H.: 2000, More Than Just a Pretty Face: Affordances of Embodiment, Proceedings of IUI 2000, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 52-59.
17. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E.: 2000, Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18. Castelfranchi, C. and de Rosis, F.: 1999, Which User Model do we need, to relax the hypothesis of 'Sincere Assertion' in HCI?, Proceedings of the Workshop on Attitudes, Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction at the 7th International Conference on User Modeling (UM '99), Banff, Canada.
19. Cegala, D., Waldro, V., Ludlum, J., McCabe, B., Yost, S. and Teboul, B.: 1988, A study of interactants' thoughts and feelings during conversation., Ninth Annual Conference on Discourse Analysis, Philadelphia, PA.
20. Cheepen, C.: 1988, The Predictability of Informal Conversation. New York: Pinter.
21. Clark, H.H.: 1996, Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Dehn, D.M. and van Mulken, S. (in press): The Impact of Animated Interface Agents: A Review of Empirical Research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, pp. 1-22.
23. Depaulo, B. and Friedman, H.: 1998, Nonverbal Communication. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 3-40.
24. Drummond, M. and Bresina, J.: 1990, Anytime synthetic projection: Maximizing the probability of goal satisfaction, AAAI-90, pp. 138-144.
25. Fikes, R. and Nilsson, N.: 1971, STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 5(2), 189-208.
26. Fogg, B.J.: 1999, Persuasive Technologies, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, pp. 27-29.
27. Fogg, B.J. and Tseng, H.: 1999, The Elements of Computer Credibility, CHI 99, Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press, pp. 80-87.
28. Goetz, P.: 1997, Attractors in Recurrent Behavior Networks. PhD Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.
29. Goffman, I.: 1967, On face-work, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, New York: Pantheon, pp. 5-46.
30. Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Hanks, S.: 1994, Discourse Planning: Technical Challenges for the Planning Community., AAAI Workshop on Planning for Inter-Agent Communication. Seattle, WA.
32. Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N.: 1999, The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.
33. Jefferson, G.: 1978, Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, New York: Academic Press, pp. 219-248.
34. Lester, J., Voerman, J., Towns, S. and Callaway, C.: 1999, 'Deictic Believability: Coordinating Gesture, Locomotion, and Speech in Lifelike Pedagogical Agents'. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4-5), 383-414.
35. Maes, P.: 1989, How to do the right thing. Connection Science Journal, 1(3), 291-323.
36. Malinowski, B.: 1923, The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In: C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning, Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 296-336.
37. Mark, G. and Becker, B.: 1999, Designing believable interaction by applying social conventions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 297-320.
38. Moon, Y.: 1998, Intimate self-disclosure exchanges: Using computers to build reciprocal relationships with consumers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Report : 99-059.
39. Morkes, J., Kernal, H. and Nass, C.: 1998, Humor in Task-Oriented Computer-Mediated Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, CHI 98, Los Angeles, CA: ACM Press, pp. 215-216.
40. Nass, C. and Lee, K.: 2000, Does Computer-Generated Speech Manifest Personality? An Experimental Test of Similarity-Attraction, CHI 2000, The Hague, Amsterdam: ACM Press, pp. 329-336.
41. Oviatt, S.: 1996, User-Centered Modeling for Spoken Language and Multimodal Interfaces. IEEE MultiMedia, 1996, 26-35.
42. Pautler, D.: 1998, A Computational Model of Social Perlocutions, COLING/ACL, Montreal.
43. Picard, R.: 1997, Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 1020-1026.
44. Reeves, B. and Nass, C.: 1996, The Media Equation: how people treat computers, televisions and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Resnick, P.V. and Lammers, H.B.: 1985, The Influence of Self-esteem on Cognitive Responses to Machine-Like Versus Human-Like Computer Feedback. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(6), 761-769.
46. Rich, C. and Sidner, C.L.: 1997, COLLAGEN: When Agents Collaborate with People, Autonomous Agents 97, Marina Del Rey, CA, pp. 284-291.
47. Rich, E.: 1979, User Modeling via Stereotypes. Cognitive Science, 3, 329-354.
48. Rickel, J. and Johnson, W.L.: 1998, Animated Agents for Procedural Traning in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition and Motor Control. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4-5), 343-382.
49. Rickenberg, R. and Reeves, B.: 2000, The Effects of Animated Characters on Anxiety, Task Performance, and Evaluations of User Interfaces, CHI 2000, The Hague, Amsterdam, pp. 49-56.
50. Sacks, H.: 1995, Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell,
51. Schneider, K.P.: 1987, Topic selection in phatic communication. Multilingua, 6(3), 247-256,
52. Schneider, K.P.: 1988, Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.
53. Searle, J.:1969, Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language: Cambridge University Press.
54. Spencer-Oatey, H.:1996, Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 1-24.
55. Stone, M. and Doran, C.:1997, Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree-Adjoining Grammar, ACL Madrid, Spain: MIT Press, pp. 198-205.
56. Svennevig, J.:1999, Getting acquainted in Conversation. Philadephia: John Benjamins.
57. Thorisson, K. R.:1997, Gandalf: An Embodied Humanoid Capable of Real-Time Multimodal Dialogue with People, Autonomous Agents '97, p. 536-537, Marina del Rey, CA.
58. Tracy, K. and Coupland, N.:1991, Multiple goals in discourse: An overview of issues. In: K. Tracy and N. Coupland (eds.), Multiple goals in discourse Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1-13.
59. Ward, N.:1997, Responsiveness in Dialog and Priorities for Language Research. Systems and Cybernetics, Special Issue on Embodied Artificial Intelligence, 28, 521-533.
60. Wheeless, L. and Grotz, J.:1977, The Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship to Self-Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250-257.
61. Wiggins, J.:1979, A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395-412.