Is the simple view of reading too simple?

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 451-469

  Høien Tengesdal, Ingjerd ^a   Logometrica, A S ^a  

^a NONE   (Norway)

Author keywords

Language comprehension; Naming speed; Phonemic awareness; Simple view of reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958516536     PISSN: 00313831     EISSN: 14701170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2010.508914     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, R.M., Gooden, R., & Bentum K.E. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67-84.
2. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, M., & Williams, K.A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilites, 32, 120-137.
3. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read. London: MIT Press.
4. Adlof, S.M., Catts, H.W., & Little, T.D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933-958.
5. Badian, N.A. (1994). Preschool prediction: Orthographic and phonological skills and reading. Annuals of Dyslexia, 44, 3-25.
6. Badian, N.A. (1997). Dyslexia and the double deficit hypothesis. Annuals of Dyslexia, 47, 68-87.
7. Badian, N.A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 472-481.
8. Ball, E.W., & Blackman, B.A. (1988). Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readiness. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 208-225.
9. Barth, A.E., Catts H.W., & Anthony, J.L (2008). The component skills underlying reading fluency in adolescent readers: A latent variable analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 567-590.
10. Birch, S., & Chase, C. (2004). Visual and language processing deficits in compensated and uncompensated college students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 389-410.
11. Bosse, M.L., Tainturier, M.J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104, 198-230.
12. Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D.P., & Mencl, W.E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary. Journal of Leaarning Disabilites, 40, 226-243.
13. Carver, R.P. (1998). Predicting reading levels in Grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 121-154.
14. Catts, H.W., Hogan, H.C., & Adlof, S.M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 2025-2040). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Catts, H.W., Hogan, T P., Adlof, S.M., & Barth, A.E. (2003). The Simple View of Reading: Changes over time. Boulder, CO: Society for Scientific Study of Reading.
16. Chen, R., & Vellutino, F.R. (1997). Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 1-24.
17. Conners, F.A. (2009). Attention control and the Simple View of Reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 591-613.
18. Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (1993). Children's literacy environments and early word recognition skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 193-204.
19. Curtis, M.E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656-669.
20. de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450-476.
21. de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of the phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22-40.
22. Dreyer, L., & Katz, L. (1992). An examination of "The Simple View of Reading". In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives (pp. 169-175). Washington, DC: The National Reading Conference.
23. Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167-188.
24. Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Fuchs, L.S., & Barnes, M.A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Georgiou, G.K., Das, J.P., & Hayward, D. (2009). Revisiting the "Simple View of Reading" in a group of children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilites, 42, 76-84.
26. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P.E. (1992). Rhyme, analogy and children's reading. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 49-64). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
27. Gough, P.B., Hoover, W.A., & Person, C.L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and Intervention (pp. 1-13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(suppl.), 6-10.
29. Hagtvet, B.E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 505-539.
30. Hoover, W.A., & Gough, P.B. (1990). The Simple View of Reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.
31. Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Høien, T. (1980). Ikonisk persistens og dysleksi [Iconic persistency and dyslexia; in Norwegian]. Stavanger: Rogalandsforskning
33. Høien, T. (2007). Håndbok til LOGOS [Handbook to LOGOS; in Norwegian]. Stavanger: Logometrica AS.
34. Høien, T., & Lundberg, I. (2000). Dyslexia: From theory to intervention. London: Kluwer Academic.
35. Johnston, T.C., & Kirby, J.R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339-361.
36. Joshi, R.M. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 209-219.
37. Joshi, R.M., & Aaron, P.G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85-97.
38. Kirby, J.R., Parrila, R.K., & Pfeiffer, S.L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453-464.
39. Kirby, J.R., & Savage, R. (2008). Can the Simple View deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42, 75-82.
40. Lundberg, I. (1994). Reading difficulties can be predicted and prevented: A Scandinavian perspective on phonological awareness and reading. In C. Hulme & M.J. Snowling (Ed.), Reading development and dyslexia (pp. 189-199). London: Whurr.
41. Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 264-293.
42. Lundberg, I., & Høien, T. (2001). Dyslexia and phonology. In A. Fawcett (Ed.), Dyslexia: Theory and good practice (pp. 109-123). London: Whurr.
43. Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159-173.
44. Lyster, S.-A.H. (2002). The effect of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 261-294.
45. McBride-Chang, C., & Manis, F.R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 323-339.
46. McGuinness, D. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visualword recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 189-208.
48. Parrila, R., Georgiou, G., & Corkett, J. (2007). University students with a significant history of reading difficulties: What is and is not compensated? Exceptionality Education Canada, 17, 195-220.
49. Perfetti, C.A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
50. Rack, J.P., Hulme, C., Snowling, M.J., & Wightman, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children's learning of sight words: The direct-mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 42-71.
51. Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S.C., Day, B.L., Castellote, J.M., White, S., & Firth, U. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain 2003, 126, 841-865.
52. Savage, R. (2001). The "Simple View" of Reading: Some evidence and possible implications. Educational Psychology in Practice, 17, 17-33.
53. Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of decoding and listening comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are very poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 143-164
54. Savage, R., Frederickson, N., Goodwin, R., Patni, U., Smith, N., & Tuersley, L. (2005). The relationship between rapid digit naming, phonological awareness, motor automaticity, and speech perception. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 12-28.
55. Savage, R., & Wolforth, J. (2007). An additive Simple View of Reading describes the performance of good and poor readers in higher education. Exceptionality Education Canada, 17, 243-268.
56. Scarborough, H. (1990). Very early language dificits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728-1743.
57. Snowling, M.J., & Hulme, C. (2005). The science of reading: A handbook. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
58. Sprugevica, I., & Høien, T. (2002). Relationship between enabling skills and reading comprehension: A follow-up study of Latvian students from first to second grade. University of Bergen, Bergen: Allkopi.
59. Stuart, M., Stainthorp, R., & Snowling, M. (2008). Literacy as a complex activity: Deconstructing the simple view of reading. Literacy, 42, 59-66.
60. Tilstra, J., McMaster K., Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 1-19.
61. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Burgess, S.R., & Hecht, S.A. (1997). The contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word reading skills in second to fifth grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161-185.
62. Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 313-330.
63. Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407-423.
64. Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1993). Development of young children's phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83-103.
65. Wilson, A.M., & Lesaux, N.K. (2001). Persistence of phonological processing deficits in college dyslexics with age-appropriate reading skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 394-400.
66. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis anddifficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668-680.
67. Wolf, M. (2001). Seven dimensions in time. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. IX-XIX). Timonium, MD: York Press.
68. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double deficit hypothesis for developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
69. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (2000). The question of naming-speed deficits in developmental reading disability: An introduction to the Double-Deficit Hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322-324.
70. Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.