Small-group learning in undergraduate STEM disciplines: Effect of group type on student achievement

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 269-286

  Micari, Marina ^a   Pazos, Pilar ^b   Streitwieser, Bernhard ^a   Light, Gregory ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Small group learning; STEM education

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958101199     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: 17444187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2010.520860     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akey, T.M. (2006). School context, student attitudes and behavior, and academic achievement: An exploratory analysis. New York, NY: MDRC. Retrieved from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/419/full.pdf
2. Berger, R., & Hanze, M. (2009). Comparison of two small-group learning methods in 12th-grade physics classes focusing on intrinsic motivation and academic performance. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1511-1527. doi:10.1080/09500690802116 289
3. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
4. Bonsangue, M.V., & Drew, D.E. (1995). Increasing minority students' success in calculus. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 61, 23-33.
5. Born, W.K., Revelle, W., & Pinto, L.H. (2002). Improving biology performance with workshop groups. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 347-365.
6. Bruffee, K. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Chinn, C., O'Donnell, A., & Jinks, T. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77-97.
8. Chizhik, A.W. (1999). Can students work together equitably? An analysis of task effects in collaborative group work. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 63-79.
9. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
10. Cooper, J., Prescott, S., Cook, L., Smith, L., Mueck, R., & Cuseo, J. (1985). Cooperative learning and college instruction: Effective use of student learning teams. Sacramento, CA: California State Foundation.
11. Cowie, H., & Rudduck, J. (1988). Cooperative group work: An overview - School and classroom studies. London, UK: BP Educational Services.
12. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., & Schmidt, H.G. (2006). What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 321-336.
13. Drane, D., Smith, H.D., Light, G., Pinto, L., & Swarat, S. (2005). The Gateway Science Workshop Program: Enhancing student performance and retention in the sciences through peer-facilitated discussion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 337-352.
14. Draskovic, I., Holdrinet, R., Bulte, J., Bolhuis, S., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2004). Modeling small group learning. Instructional Science, 32, 447-473.
15. Dreyfus, A.E. (2002). How are we doing? Steady growth in implementing peer-led team learning. Progressions: Peer-Led Team Learning, 3(3-4), 1-5.
16. Freeman, M. (1995). Mathexcel: A special opportunity in calculus. Unpublished Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
17. Freeman, T.M., Anderman, L.H., & Jensen, J.M. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 203-220.
18. Gosser, D.K., Cracolice, M.S., Kampmeier, J.A., Roth, V., Strozak, V.S., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2001). Peer-led team learning: A guidebook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Goubeaud, K. (2006). Assessment practices in college science: Trends from the national study of postsecondary faculty. In J.J. Mintzes & W.H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 371-379). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
20. Hains, D., & McKeachie, W. (1967). Cooperative versus competitive discussion methods in teaching introductory psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 386-390.
21. Haller, C.R., Gallager, V.J., Weldon, T.L., & Felder, R.M. (2000). Dynamics of peer education in cooperative learning workgroups. Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 285-293.
22. Hastings, N., & Schwieso, J. (1995). Tasks and tables: The effects of seating arrangements on task engagement in primary classrooms. Educational Research, 37, 279-291.
23. Hendry, G.D., Ryan, G., & Harris, J. (2003). Group problems in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 25, 609-616.
24. Hinton, P. (2004). Statistics explained. New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.
26. Holen, A. (2000). The PBL group: Self-reflections and feedback for improved learning and growth. Medical Teacher, 22, 485-488.
27. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35.
28. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal peer questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664-687.
29. King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative-questioning on children's knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127-148.
30. Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2002). Pupil groupings in primary school classrooms: Sites for learning and social pedagogy? British Educational Research Journal, 28,187-206.
31. Lyle, K.S., & Robinson, W.R. (2003). A statistical evaluation: Peer-led team learning in an organic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 132.
32. Micari, M., Knife Gould, A., & Lainez, L. (2010). Becoming a leader along the way: Embedding leadership training into a large-scale peer-learning program in the STEM disciplines. Journal of College Student Development, 51(2), 218-230.
33. Micari, M., Streitwieser, B., & Light, G. (2005). Undergraduates leading undergraduates: Peer facilitation in a science workshop program. Innovative Higher Education, 30, 269-288.
34. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99-113.
35. Niaz, M., & Logie, R.H. (1993). Working memory, mental capacity and science education: Towards an understanding of the ... working memory overload hypothesis". Oxford Review of Education, 19, 511-525.
36. Pazos, P., Micari, M., & Light, G. (2010). Developing an instrument to characterise peer-led groups in collaborative learning environments: Assessing problem-solving approach and group interaction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 191-208.
37. Portney, L.G., & Watkins, M.P. (1993). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
38. Shaw, M.E., Ackerman, B., McCown, N.E., Worsham, A.P., Haugh, L.D., Gebhardt, B.M., & Small, P.A., Jr. (1979). Interaction patterns and facilitation of peer learning. Small Group Research, 10, 214-223.
39. Shaw, M.E., & Webb, J. (1982). When compatibility interferes with group effectiveness: Facilitation of learning in small groups. Small Group Research, 13, 555-564.
40. Slavin, R.E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
41. Smith, B., & MacGregor, J. (1992). What is collaborative learning? In A. Goodsell, M. Mahler, V. Tinto, B.L. Smith, & J. MacGregor (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 9-22). University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
42. Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., & Donovan, S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.
43. Swarat, S., Drane, D., Smith, H.D., Light, G., & Pinto, L. (2004). Opening the gateway: Increasing student retention in introductory science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(1), 2-7.
44. Thomas, S. (2006). Sampling: Rationale and rigor in choosing what to observe. In C.F. Conrad & R.C. Serlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook for research in education (pp. 393-404). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Tien, L.T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J.A. (2002). Implementation of a peer-led learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 606-632.
46. Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311-330.
47. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W.H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P.A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521.
48. Van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Kirschner, P.A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5-13.
49. Veenman, S., Denessen, E., Van den Akker, A., & Van der Rijt, J. (2005). Effects of a cooperative learning program on the elaborations of students during help seeking and help giving. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 115-151.
50. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19, 128-143.
51. Webb, N.M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational research, 13, 21-39.
52. Webb, N.M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
53. Webb, N.M., Farivar, S.H., & Mastergeorge, A.M. (2002). Productive helping in cooperative groups. Theory Into Practice, 41, 13-20.
54. Wilson, M., & Scalise, K. (2006). Assessment to improve learning in higher education: The BEAR assessment system. Higher Education, 52, 635-663.
55. Yanowitz, K.L., & Hahs-Vaughn, D.L. (2007). Changes in student-centred assessment by postsecondary science and non-science faculty. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 171-185.
56. Yuan, K., Steedle, J., Shavelson, R., Alonzo, A., & Oppezzo, M. (2006). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and science learning. Educational Research Review, 1, 83-98.