DNA barcoding and traditional taxonomy unified through integrative Taxonomy: A view that challenges the debate questioning both methodologies;DNA barcoding and traditional taxonomy unified through integrative Taxonomy: A view that challenges the debate questioning both methodologies

Biota Neotropica

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 339-346

  Pires, Amanda Ciprandi ^a   Marinoni, Luciane ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; COI; Morphology; Species; Taxonomic impediment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957990960     PISSN: 16786424     EISSN: 16760611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1676-06032010000200035     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. BLAXTER, M. & FLOYD, R. 2003. Molecular taxonomics for biodiversity surveys: already a reality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:268-269.
2. BLAXTER, M., MANN, J., CHAPMAN, T., THOMAS, F., WHITTON, C., FLOYD, R. & ABEBE, E. 2005. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 360:1935-1943.
3. BLAXTER, M.L. 2004. The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 359:669-679.
4. BLAXTER, ML. 2006. Will DNA barcoding advance efforts to conserve biodiversity more efficiently than traditional taxonomic methods? (two views) Front. Ecol. Environ. 4:268-273.
5. BORISENKO, A.V., BURTON, K.L., IVANOVA, N.V., HANNER, R.H. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2008. DNA barcoding in surveys of small mammal communities: a field study in Suriname. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8:471-479.
6. CAMERON, S., RUBINOFF, D. & WILL, K. 2006. Who will actually use DNA barcoding and what will it cost? Syst. Biol. 55:844-847.
7. CARDOSO, A., SERRANO, A. & VOGLER, A.P. 2009. Morphological and molecular variation in tiger beetles of the Cicindela hybrida complex: is an 'integrative taxonomy' possible? Mol. Ecol. 18:648-664.
8. CARVALHO, M.R., BOCKMANN, F.A., AMORIM, D.S. & BRANDÃO, C.R. 2008. Systematics must embrace comparative biology and evolution, not speed and automation. Evol. Biol. 35:150-157.
9. CBOL PLANT WORKING GROUP. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:12794-12797.
10. CHASE, M.W. & FAY, M.F. 2010. Barcoding of plants and fungi. Science. 325:682-683.
11. COGNATO, A.I. 2006. Standard percent DNA sequence difference for insects does not predict species boundaries. J. Econ. Entomol. 99:1037-1045.
12. CYWINSKA, A., HUNTER, F.F. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2006. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med. Vet. Entomol. 20:413-424.
13. DAYRAT, B. 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 85:407-415.
14. DESALLE, R. 2006. Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: Response to Rubinoff. Conserv. Biol. 20:1545-1547.
15. DESALLE, R., EGAN, M.G. & SIDDAL, M. 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 360:1905-1916.
16. DUNN, C.P. 2003. Keeping taxonomy based in morphology. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 18:270-271.
17. EBACH, M.C. & CARVALHO, M.R. 2010. Anti-intellectualism in the DNA barcoding enterprise. Zoologia 27:165-178.
18. EBACH, M.C. & HOLDREGE, C. 2005a. More taxonomy, not DNA barcoding. BioScience 55:822-823.
19. EBACH, M.C. & HOLDREGE, C. 2005b. DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature 434:697.
20. FISHER, B.L. & SMITH, M.A. 2008. A revision of Malagasy Species of Anochetus Mayr and Odontomachus Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Plos One 3(5):e1787.
21. FOX, G.E., STACKEBRANDT, E., HESPEL, R.B., GIBSON, J., MANILOFF, J., DYER, T.A., WOLFE, R.S., BALCH, W.E., TANNER, R.S., MAGRUM, L.J., ZABLEN, L.B., BLAKEMORE, R., GUPTA, R., BONEN, L., LEWIS, B.J., STAHL, D.A., LUEHRSEN, K.R., CHEN, K.N. & WOESE, C.R. 1980. The phylogeny of prokaryotes. Science 209:457-463.
22. FUNK, D.J. & OMLAND, K.E. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 34:397-423.
23. GODFRAY, H.C.J. 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature 417:17-18.
24. GREGORY, T.R. 2005. DNA barcoding does not compete with taxonomy. Nature 434:1067.
25. HAJIBABAEI, M., JANZEN, D.H., BURNS, J.M., HALLWACHS, W. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2006a. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103:968-971.
26. HAJIBABAEI, M., SINGER, G.A.C., HEBERT, P.D.N. & HICKEY, D.A. 2007. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends Genet. 23:167-172.
27. HAJIBABAEI, M., SMITH, M.A., JANZEN, D.H., RODRIGUEZ, J.J., WHITFIELS, J.B. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2006b. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6:959-964.
28. HAJIBABAEI, M., WAARD, J.R., IVANOVA, N.V., RATSASINGHAM, S., DOOH, R.T., KIRK, S.L., MACKIE, P.M. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2005. Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes. Phylos. T. R. Soc. B 360:1959-1967.
29. HAMADA, N., PEPINELLI, M., Mattos-Glória, A. & Luz, S.L.B. 2010. A new black fly species from Brazil, closely related to Simulium guianense Wise (Diptera, Simuliidae), revealed by morphology and DNA barcoding. Zootaxa. 2428:22-36.
30. HEBERT, P.D.N. & GREGORY, T.R. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54:852-859.
31. HEBERT, P.D.N., CYWINSKA, A., BALL, S.L. & WAARD, J.R. DE. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270:313-321.
32. HEBERT, P.D.N., STOECKLE, M.Y., ZEMLAK, T.S. & FRANCIS, C.M. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. Plos Biol. 2:1657-1663.
33. HERRE, E.A. 2006. Barcoding helps biodiversity fly. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:3949-3950.
34. KERR, K.C.R., LIJTMAER, D.A., BARREIRA, A.S., HEBERT, P.D.N. & TUBARO, P.L. 2009. Probing evolutionary patterns in neotropical birds through DNA barcodes. Plos One 4:e4379.
35. LA SALLE, J., WHEELER, Q., JACKWAY, P., WINTERTON, S., HOBERN, D. & LOVELL, D. 2009. Accelerating taxonomic discovery through automated character extraction. Zootaxa. 2217:43-55.
36. LEE, M.S.Y. 2002. Online database could end taxonomic anarchy. Nature 417:787-788.
37. LEE, M.S.Y. 2004. The molecularisation of taxonomy. Invertebr. Syst. 18:1-6.
38. LIPSCOMB, D., PLATNICK, N. & WHEELER, Q. 2003. The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:65-66.
39. MALLET, J. & WILLMOTT, K. 2003. Taxonomy: renaissance or tower of babel? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:57-59.
40. MAY, R.M. 2004. Tomorrow's taxonomy: collecting new species in the field will remain the rate-limiting step. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 359:733-734.
41. MEIER, R., SHIYANG, K., VAIDYA, G. & NG, P.K.L. 2006. DNA Barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst. Biol. 55(5):715-728.
42. Mengual, X. & Thompson, F.C. 2008. A taxonomic review of the Palpada ruficeps species group, with the description of a new flower fly from Colombia (Diptera, Syrphidae). Zootaxa 1741:31-36.
43. MENGUAL, X., STAHLS, G., VUJIC, A. & Marcos-Garcia, M.A. 2006. Integrative taxonomy of Iberian Merodon species (Diptera, Syrphidae). Zootaxa 1377:1-26.
44. MEYER, C.P. & PAULAY, G. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. Plos Biol. 3:e422.
45. MILANKOV, V., STAHLS, G., STAMENKOVIC, J. & VUJIC, A. 2008. Genetic diversity of Merodon aureus and M. cinereus species complexes (Diptera, Syrphidae): integrative taxonomy and implications for conservation priorities on the Balkan Peninsula. Conserv. Genet. 9:1125-1137.
46. MORITZ, C. & CICERO, C. 2004. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. Plos Biol. 2:1529-1531.
47. PACE, N.R. 1997. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276:734-740.
48. PACKER, L., GIBBS, J., SHEFFIELD, C. & HANNER, R. 2009. DNA barcoding and the mediocrity of morphology. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9:42-50.
49. PADIAL, J.M. & DE LA RIVA, I. 2007. Integrative taxonomists should use and produce DNA barcodes. Zootaxa 1586:67-68.
50. PATEL, J.B., LEONARD, D.G.B., PAN, X., MUSSER, J.M., BERGMAN, R.E. & NACHAMKIN, I. 2000. Sequence-based identification of Mycobacterium species using the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:246-251.
51. PRENDINI, L. 2005. Comment on ''Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes''. Can. J. Zoolog. 83:481-491.
52. PYLE, R.L., EARLE, J.L. & GREENE, B.D. 2008. Five new species of the damselfish genus Chromis (Perciformes: Labroidei: Pomacentridae) from deep coral reefs in the tropical western Pacific. Zootaxa. 1671:3-31.
53. RADULOVICI, A.E., ARCHAMBAULT, P. & DUFRESNE, F. 2010. DNA Barcodes for Marine Biodiversity: Moving Fast Forward? Diversity 2:450-472.
54. RATNASINGHAM, S. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data Systems. Mol. Ecol. 7:355-364.
55. ROE, A.D. & SPERLING, F.A.H. 2007. Population structure and species boundary delimitation of cryptic Dioryctria moths: an integrative approach. Mol. Ecol. 16:3617-3633.
56. RUBINOFF, D. 2006. Utility of Mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation. Conserv. Biol. 20:1026-1033.
57. RUBINOFF, D., CAMERON, S. & WILL, K. 2006. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for ''Barcoding'' identification. J. Hered. 97:581-594.
58. SAVOLAINEN, V., COWAN, R.S., VOGLER, A.P., RODERICK, G.K. & LANE, R. 2005. Towards the encyclopedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Phylos. T. R. Soc. B 360:1805-1811.
59. Schlick-Steiner, B.C., Steiner, F.M., Moder, K., Seifert, B., Sanetra, M., Dyreson, E., Stauffer, C. & Christian, E. 2006. A multidisciplinary approach reveals cryptic diversity in Western Paleartic Tetramorium ants (Hymenoptera: Formcidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40:259-273.
60. SEBERG, O. & PETERSEN, G. 2009. How Many Loci Does it Take to DNA Barcode a Crocus? Plos One. 4:e4598.
61. SEBERG, O., HUMPHRIES, C.J., KNAPP, S., STEVENSON, D.W., PETERSEN, G., SCHARFF, N. & ANDERSEN, N.M. 2003. Shortcuts in systematic? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:63-65.
62. SMITH, M.A., RODRIGUEZ, J.J., WHITFIELD, J.B., DEANS, A.R., JANZEN, D.H., HALLWACHS, W. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2008. Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:12359-12364.
63. SMITH, M.A., WOOD, D.M., JANZEN, D.H., HALLWACHS, W. & HEBERT, P.D. 2007. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104:4967-4972.
64. SMITH, V.S. 2005. DNA barcoding: perspectives from a ''Partnerships for Enhancing expertise in taxonomy'' (PEET) debate. Syst. Biol. 54:841-844.
65. SPERLING, F. 2003. DNA barcoding: Deus ex machina. Newsl. Biol. Surv. Can. 22:50-53.
66. SPERLING, F.A.H., ANDERSON, G.S. & HICKEY, D.A. 1994. A DNAbased approach to the identification of insect species used for postmortem interval estimation. J. Forensic Sci. 39:418-427.
67. TAUTZ, D., Arctander, P., Minelli, A., Thomas, R.H. & Vogler, A.P. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:70-74.
68. TAUTZ, D., ARCTANDER, P., MINELLI, A., THOMAS, R.H. & VOGLER, A.P. 2002. DNA points the way ahead in taxonomy. Nature 418:479.
69. VAGLIA, T., HAXAIRE, J., KITCHING, I.J., MEUSNIER, I. & ROUGERIE, R. 2008. Morphology and DNA barcoding reveal three cryptic species within the Xylophanes neoptolemus and loelia species-groups (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Zootaxa 1923:18-36.
70. VALDECASAS, A.G., WILLIAMS, D. & WHEELER, Q.D. 2008. 'Integrative taxonomy' then and now: a response to Dayrat (2005). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 93:211-216.
71. VOGLER, A.P & MONAGHAN, M.T. 2007. Recent advances in DNA taxonomy. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 45(1):1-10.
72. WAKE, M.H. 2003. What is integrative biology? Integr. Comp. Biol. 43:239-241.
73. WARD, R.D., HANNER, R. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J. Fish Biol. 74:329-356.
74. WARD, R.D., ZEMLAK, S.T., INNES, B.H., LAST, P.R. & HEBERT, P.D.N. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia ́s fish species. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 360:1847-1857.
75. WHEELER, Q.D. 2007. Invertebrate systematics or spineless taxonomy? Zootaxa. 1668:11-18.
76. WHEELER, Q.D., RAVEN, P.H. & WILSON, E.O. 2004. Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science 303:285.
77. WHITWORTH, T.L., DAWSON, R.D., MAGALON, H. & BAUDRY, E. 2007. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). P. R. Soc. B 274:1731-1739.
78. WIEDENBRUG, S., MENDES, H.F., PEPINELLI, M. & TRIVINHOSTRIXINO, S. 2009. Review of the genus Onconeura Andersen et Saether (Diptera: Chironomidae), with the description of four new species from Brazil. Zootaxa 2265:1-26.
79. WILL, K.W., MISHLER, B.D. & WHEELER, Q.D. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54:844-851.
80. WILSON, E.O. 1985. The Biological Diversity Crisis. BioScience. 35:700-706.
81. WILSON, E.O. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:77-80.
82. WILSON, E.O. 2004. Taxonomy as a fundamental discipline. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 359:739.