Morphological and molecular variation in tiger beetles of the Cicindela hybrida complex: Is an 'integrative taxonomy' possible?

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 648-664

  Cardoso, A ^a,b   Serrano, A ^b   Vogler, A P ^a,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Association tests; Integrative taxonomy; Internal transcribed spacer; Nested clades; Species concepts; Statistical parsimony analysis

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EUROPE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BEETLES; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EUROPE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; HAPLOTYPES; MITOCHONDRIA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

CICINDELA HYBRIDA; CICINDELIDAE; COLEOPTERA;

EID: 58849154052     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04048.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abellán P, Gómez-Zurita J, Millán A et al 2007) Conservation genetics in hypersaline inland waters: mitochondrial diversity and phylogeography of an endangered Iberian beetle (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Conservation Genetics, 8, 79 88.
2. Ahrens D, Monaghan MT, Vogler AP (2007) DNA-based taxonomy for associating adults and larvae in multi-species assemblages of chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 436 449.
3. Avise JC (1992) Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: a case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos, 63, 62 76.
4. Baker RH, DeSalle R (1997) Multiple sources of molecular characteristics and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Systematic Biology, 46, 654 673.
5. Baum DA, Shaw KL (1995) Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In : Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 53 (eds Hoch PC, Stephenson AG), pp. 289 303. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri.
6. Bremer K (1988) The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42, 795 803.
7. Brower AVZ (1999) Delimitation of phylogenetic species with DNA sequences: a critique of Davis and Nixon's population aggregation analysis. Systematic Biology, 48, 199 213.
8. Brower AVZ, DeSalle R, Vogler A (1996) Gene trees, species trees, and systematics: a cladistic perspective. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 423 450.
9. Cardoso A, Vogler AP (2005) DNA taxonomy, phylogeny and Pleistocene diversification of the Cicindela hybrida species group (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Molecular Ecology, 14, 3531 3546.
10. Carstens BC, Knowles LL (2007) Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Systematic Biology, 56, 400 411.
11. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) tcs: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1657 1659.
12. Cracraft J (1983) Species concept and speciation analysis. Current Ornithology, 1, 159 187.
13. Davis JI, Nixon KC (1992) Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systematic Biology, 41, 421 435.
14. Dayrat B (2005) Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 85, 407 415.
15. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C (1994) Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics, 10, 315 319.
16. Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34, 397 423.
17. Gatesy J, O'Grady P, Baker RH (1999) Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level Artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics, 15, 271 313.
18. Gebert J (1995) Revision der Cicindela (s. str.) hybrida-Gruppe (sensu Mandl 1935/6) und Bemerkungen zu einigen äußerlich ähnlichen paläarktischen Arten. Mitteilungen der Munchener Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 86, 3 32.
19. Gebert J (1999) Erster Nachtrag und Berichtigung zur 'Revision der Cicindela (s. str.) hybrida-Gruppe (sensu Mandl 1935/36)'. Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen, 48, 86 87.
20. Gómez-Zurita J, Vogler AP (2003) Incongruent nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeographic patterns in the Timarcha goettingensis species complex (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 833 843.
21. Hart MW, Sunday J (2007) Things fall apart: biological species form unconnected parsimony networks. Biology Letters, 3, 509 512.
22. Hebert PDN, Gregory TR (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54, 852 859.
23. Hey J, Nielsen R (2004) Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics, 167, 747 760.
24. Horn WH (1926) Pars 86: Carabidae: Cicindelidae. Coleopterum Catalogous. Junk and Schenkling, Berlin.
25. Hughes J, Longhorn SJ, Papadopoulou A et al 2006) Dense taxonomic EST sampling and its applications for molecular systematics of the Coleoptera (beetles). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 268 278.
26. Kluge AG (1989) A concern for evidence and phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology, 38, 7 25.
27. Knowles LL, Carstens BC (2007) Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Systematic Biology, 56, 887 895.
28. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) mega3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 5, 150 163.
29. López H, Contreras-Díaz HG, Oromí P, Juan C (2007) Delimiting species boundaries for endangered Canary Island grasshoppers based on DNA sequence data. Conservation Genetics, 8, 587 598.
30. Maddison WP, Knowles LL (2006) Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Systematic Biology, 55, 21 30.
31. Mandl K (1935) Vorarbeiten für eine monographische Neubearbeitung der paläarktischen Cicindelen. Revision der Cicindela hybrida-Gruppe (C. hybrida, coerulea, transbaicalica, altaica, maritima). Arbeiten Über Morphologische und Taxonomische Entomologie Aus Berlin-Dahlem, 2, 283 306.
32. Mandl K (1936) Vorarbeiten für eine monographische Neubearbeitung der paläarktischen Cicindelen. Revision der Cicindela hybrida-Gruppe (C. hybrida, coerulea, transbaicalica, altaica, maritima). Arbeiten Über Morphologische und Taxonomische Entomologie Aus Berlin-Dahlem, 3, 5 32.
33. Matalin AV (1998) The tiger-beetles of 'hybrida'-species group (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae). III. A taxonomic review of the Iberian Cicindela lagunensis Gautier, 1872 complex. Graellsia, 54, 75 96.
34. Matalin AV (1999) The tiger-beetles of the hybrida species-group. II. A taxonomic review of subspecies of Cicindela sahlbergii Fischer von Waldheim, 1824 (Coleoptera Carabidae Cicindelini). In : Advances in Carabidology (eds Zamotajlov A, Sciaky R), pp. 13 66. MUISO Publishers, Krasnodar, Russia.
35. Monaghan MT, Balke M, Gregory TR, Vogler AP (2005) DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1925 1933.
36. Nelson G (1989) Species and taxa: systematics and evolution. In : Speciation and its Consequences (eds Otte D, Endler JA), pp. 60 81. Sinauer & Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. Pearson DL, Vogler AP (2001) Tiger Beetles: The Evolution, Ecology and Diversity of the Cicindelids. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
38. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Theodorides K, Cardoso A, Vogler AP (2004) Using exon and intron sequences of the gene Mp20 to resolve basal relationships in Cicindela (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Systematic Biology, 53, 554 570.
39. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J et al 2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology, 55, 595 609.
40. Posada D, Crandall KA, Templeton AR (2000) GeoDis: a program for the cladistic nested analysis of the geographical distribution of genetic haplotypes. Molecular Ecology, 9, 487 488.
41. Roff DA, Bentzen P (1989) The statistical analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: chi-2 and the problem of small samples. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 6, 539 545.
42. Rozas J, Sanchez-De I, Barrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics, 19, 2496 2497.
43. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) Are plant DNA barcodes a search for the Holy Grail? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 1 2.
44. Sites JW, Marshall JC (2004) Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, 199 227.
45. Sorenson MD (1999) TreeRot version 2.0. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
46. Swofford DL (2002) paup*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony, version 4.0b. Sinauer & Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
47. Templeton AR, Boerwinkle E, Sing CF (1987) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila. Genetics, 117, 343 351.
48. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics, 132, 619 633.
49. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The Clustal-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 4876 4882.
50. Valdecasas AG, Williams D, Wheeler QD (2008) 'Integrative taxonomy' then and now: a response to Dayrat (2005). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93, 211 216.
51. Vogler AP, DeSalle R (1994) Evolution and phylogenetic information content of the ITS-1 region in the tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 393 405.
52. Vrana P, Wheeler WC (1992) Individual organisms as terminal entities: laying the species problem to rest. Cladistics, 8, 67 72.
53. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In : PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky J, White TJ), pp. 315 322. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
54. Wiens JJ (2001) Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problems and solutions. Systematic Biology, 50, 689 699.
55. Wiens JJ, Penkrot TA (2002) Delimiting species using DNA and morphological variation and discordant species limits in spiny lizards (Sceloporus). Systematic Biology, 51, 69 91.
56. Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD (2005) The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54, 844 851.