The three T's of the structure of online collaborative activities

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 2610-2615

  Persico, Donatella ^a   Pozzi, Francesca ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

case studies; Computer supported collaborative learning; discussion; jigsaw; peer review; role play; structured activities

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957716935     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.382     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J. & Snapp M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Company.
2. Aviv R., Erlich Z., Ravid G., Geva A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1-23.
3. Bell, P. (2004). Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education, (pp. 114-144), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Blocher, J.M. (2005). Increasing learner interaction: using jigsaw online. Educational Media International, 42(3), 269-278.
5. Daradoumis, T., Martinez-Monés, A. & Xhafa, F. (2004). An integrated approach for analysing and assessing the performance of virtual learning groups. Lecture notes in Computer Science, 3198, 289-304.
6. Delfino, M. & Persico, D. (2007). Online or face-to-face? Experimenting different techniques in initial teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 351-365.
7. Demetriadis, S. Dimitriadis, Y. & Fischer, F. (2009). Introduction to the SFC-2009 Workshop. In: Proceedings of the workshop "Scripted vs. free collaboration: alternatives and paths for adaptable and flexible CS scripted collaboration", Rhodes, June 2009. Available online at: http://mlab.csd.auth.gr/cscl2009/SFC-files/SFC-2009-WorkshopProceedings.pdf
8. De Wever, B., Shellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education, 46, 6-28.
9. Dillenbourg, P.(2004). Split where interaction should happen- A model for designing CSCL scripts. In Proceedings of the "Special Interest Meeting 2004 of EARLI SIG 6 and SIG 7", Tuebingen, 2004. Available online at: http://www.iwmkmrc. de/workshops/SIM2004/pdf-files/Dillenbourg.pdf
10. Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Pergamon Press.
11. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner P. A. (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL, (pp. 61-91), Heerlen, NL: Open Universiteit Nederland.
12. Dillenbourg, P. & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing interactive scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, and J. Haake, (Eds.) Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives, (pp. 276-301), New York: Springer.
13. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J.M. (Eds.) (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
14. Garrison R. & Anderson T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. A framework for research and practice. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
15. Hara N., Bonk C. J. & Angeli C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.
16. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed), Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing, (pp. 115-136), The Najaden Papers, New York: Springer.
17. Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I, Dimitriadis ,Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Ruiz-Requies, I. & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 58-71.
18. Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(4), 567-589.
19. Kanuka, H. & Anderson, T. (1999), Using Constructivism in Technology-Mediated Learning: Constructing Order out of the Chaos in the Literature. Radical Pedagogy. 1(2).
20. Lally, V. (Ed) (2002). Elaborating collaborative interactions in networked learning: a multi-method approach. In: Proceedings of the Networked Learning Conference, March 2002, University of Sheffield.
21. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J. & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487-509.
22. Liu, C., & Tsai, C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50, 627-639.
23. Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E. & De La Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353-368.
24. Palloff, R. M. & Pratt, K.(1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
25. Persico, D., Pozzi, F. & Sarti, L. (2009). A model for monitoring and evaluating CSCL. In: Juan, A.A., Daradoumis, T., Xhafa, F., Caballe, S., Faulin, J. (Eds.) Monitoring and Assessment in Online Collaborative Environments: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-learning Support. IGI Global.
26. Pozzi, F., Manca, S., Persico, D. & Sarti, L. (2007). A general framework for tracking and analyzing learning processes in CSCL environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 44(2), 169-180.
27. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R. & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
28. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
29. Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70.
30. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J. & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48.
31. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1991). Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 31(10), 16-18.
32. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyse argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.