Construction and first validation of a scale assessing subjective educational task values;Konstruktion und erste validierung einer skala zur erfassung subjektiver schulischer werte (SESSW)

Diagnostica

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 195-211

  Steinmayr, Ricarda ^a   Spinath, Birgit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ability self concept; Course choices; Gender differences; School domains; Subjective task values

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957714015     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000023     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Atwater, M. M., Wiggins, J. & Gardner, C. M. (1995). A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 665-677.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
3. Beauducel, A. & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75.
4. Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169-232.
5. Benbow, C. P. & Minor, L. L. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 425-436.
6. Bühner, M. (2006). Einführung in die Test-und Fragebogenkonstruktion. München: Pearson Studium.
7. Crombie, G., Sinclair, N., Silverthorn, N., Byrne, B. M., DuBois, D. L. & Trinneer, A. (2005). Predictors of young adolescents' math grades and course enrollment intentions: Gender similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 52, 351-367.
8. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
9. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). 21. Nov., 2009, Internet: http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/ intrins.html.
10. Durik, A. M., Vida, M. & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382-393.
11. Eccles, J. S. & Harold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying the Eccles' expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7-35.
12. Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
13. Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
14. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.
15. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105-121). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
16. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.
17. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L. et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
18. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A. & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, 5th ed.: Vol 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 1017-1095). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D. & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self-and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830-847.
20. Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrolment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancyvalence framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 381-391.
21. Hoffmann, L., Häußler, P. & Peters-Haft, S. (1997). An den Interessen von Mädchen und Jungen orientierter Physikunterricht, IPN-Schriftenreihe (Bd. 155, S. 321). Kiel: IPN.
22. Hoffmann, L., Häussler, P., Lehrke, M. & Todt, E. (1998). Schülerfragebogen zur Veränderung von Schülerinteressen an Physik und Technik vom 5. bis 10. Schuljahr. In L. Hoffman, P. Häussler & M. Lherke (Hrsg.), Die IPN-Interessenstudie Physik. IPN-Schriftenreihe (Bd. 158, S. 164-224). Kiel: IPN.
23. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509-527.
24. Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1-19.
25. Kessels, U., Rau, M. & Hannover, B. (2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 761-780.
26. Köller, O., Daniels, Z., Schnabel, K. U. & Baumert, J. (2000). Kurswahlen von Mädchen und Jungen im Fach Mathematik: Zur Rolle von fachspezifischem Selbstkonzept und Interesse. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 14, 26-37.
27. Köller, O., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O. & Baumert, J. (2006). Zum Zusammenspiel von schulischer Leistung, Selbstkonzept und Interesse in der gymnasialen Oberstufe. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 27-39.
28. Krapp, A. (1992). Das Interessenkonstrukt - Bestimmungsmerkmale der Interessenhandlung und des individuellen Interesses aus der Sicht einer Person-Gegenstandskonzeption. In A. Krapp & M. Prenzel (Hrsg.), Interesse, Lernen, Leistung. Neuere Ansätze der pädagogisch-psychologischen Interessensforschung (S. 297-329). Münster: Aschendorf.
29. Kunter, M., Schümer, G., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M. et al. (2002). Pisa 2000: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Berlin: MPI für Bildungsforschung.
30. LeBreton, J. M., Hargis, M. B., Griepentrog, B., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2007). A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 60, 475-498.
31. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70.
32. Möller, J. & Köller, O. (2004). Die Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Effekte dimensionaler und sozialer Vergleiche. Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 19-27.
33. Nagy, G., Garrett, J., Trautwein, U., Cortina, K. S., Baumert, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Gendered high school course selection as a precursor of gendered careers: The mediating role of selfconcept and intrinsic value. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 115-143). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.
34. Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O. & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 323-345.
35. Rost, D. H. & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2002). Facetten des schulischen Selbstkonzepts - Ein Verfahren zur Messung des differentiellen Selbstkonzepts schulischer Leistungen und Fähigkeiten (DISK-Gitter). Diagnostica, 48, 130-140.
36. Rost, D. H. (2007). Interpretation und Bewertung pä dagogischpsychologischer Studien. Weinheim: Beltz.
37. Rost, D. H., Sparfeldt, J. R. & Schilling, S. R. (2007). DISK-Gitter mit SKSLF-8. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
38. Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
39. Schiefele, U. (1996). Motivation und Lernen mit Texten. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
40. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A. & Schreyer, I. (1993). Metaanalyse des Zusammenhangs von Interesse und schulischer. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 120-148.
41. Schilling, S. R., Sparfeldt, J. R., Rost, D. H. & Nickels, G. (2005). Schulische Selbstkonzepte - Zur Validität einer erweiterten Version des Differentiellen Selbstkonzept Gitters (DISK-Gitter). Diagnostica, 51, 21-28.
42. Schöne, C., Dickhäuser, O., Spinath, B. & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2002). Die Skalen zur Erfassung des schulischen Selbstkonzepts (SESSKO). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
43. Schnirch, A. & Welzel, M. (2006). Neue Medien im Schulalltag - ein Versuch, eine gendersensitive computerunterstützte Lernumgebung für den Physikunterricht zu konzipieren. In A. Treibel, M. Maier, S. Kommer & M. Welzel (Hrsg.), Gender medienkompetent. Medienbildung in einer heterogenen Gesellschaft (S. 125-140). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
44. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J. & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Selfconcept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
45. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E. & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70-83.
46. Steinmayr, R. & Spinath, B. (2007). Predicting school achievement from motivation and personality. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 207-216.
47. Steinmayr, R. & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: What are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22, 185-209.
48. Steinmayr, R. & Spinath, B. (2009). The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 80-90.
49. Trautwein, U. & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students' self-reported effort and fine on homework in six school subjects: Betweenstudents differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 432-444.
50. Trautwein, U. & Lüdtke, O., Schnyder, I. & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438-456.
51. Updegraff, K. A., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L. & O'Brien, K. M. (1996). Course enrolment as self-regulatory behaviour: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239-259.
52. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
53. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Test anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Educational Psychologist, 24, 159-183.
54. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Development Review 12 (3), 265-310.
55. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D. A. & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children's domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-565.
56. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., Davis-Kean, P., Eisenberg, N., et al. (2006). Development of Achievement Motivation. In Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.). (pp. 933-1002). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
57. Wilde, M., Bätz, K., Kovaleva, A. & Urhahne, D. (2009). Überprüfung einer Kurzskala intrinsischer Motivation (KIM). Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 15, 31-45.