Scoring function to predict solubility mutagenesis

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Tian, Ye ^a   Deutsch, Christopher ^b   Krishnamoorthy, Bala ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957343461     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17487188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7188-5-33     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Dehouck Y, Grosfils A, Folch B, Gilis D, Bogaerts P, Rooman M. Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(19):2537-2543. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp445, 19654118.
2. Cheng J, Randall A, Baldi P. Prediction of protein stability changes for single-site mutations using support vector machines. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2006, 62(4):1125-1132.
3. Deutsch C, Krishnamoorthy B. Four-body scoring function for mutagenesis. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(22):3009-3015. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm481, 17921497.
4. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Rossi I, Casadio R. A three-state prediction of single point mutations on protein stability changes. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 2):S6. online, 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S2-S6, 2323669, 18387208.
5. Masso M, Vaisman II. Accurate prediction of enzyme mutant activity based on a multibody statistical potential. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(23):3155-3161. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm509, 17977887.
6. Idicula-Thomas S, Kulkarni AJ, Kulkarni BD, Jayaraman VK, Balaji PV. A support vector machine-based method for predicting the propensity of a protein to be soluble or to form inclusion body on overexpression in Escherichia coli. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(3):278-284. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti810, 16332713.
7. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. Journal of Molecular Biology 1996, 256(3):623-644. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0114, 8604144.
8. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. Journal of Molecular Biology 1990, 213:859-883. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80269-4, 2359125.
9. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology 1998, 275(5):895-916. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1479, 9480776.
10. Li X, Hu C, Liang J. Simplicial edge representation of protein structures and alpha contact potential with confidence measure. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2003, 53(4):792-805.
11. Banavar JR, Maritan A, Micheletti C, Trovato A. Geometry and physics of proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 2002, 47(3):315-322.
12. Li X, Liang J. Geometric cooperativity and anticooperativity of three-body interactions in native proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2005, 60:46-65.
13. Singh RK, Tropsha A, Vaisman II. Delaunay tessellation of proteins: Four body nearest neighbor propensities of amino acid residues. Journal of Computational Biology 1996, 3(2):213-222. 10.1089/cmb.1996.3.213, 8811483.
14. Krishnamoorthy B, Tropsha A. Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential for discriminating native from non-native protein conformations. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(12):1540-1549. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg186, 12912835.
15. Feng Y, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL. Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2007, 68:57-66.
16. Ben-Naim A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: Are these meaningful potentials?. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1997, 107(9):3698-3706.
17. Edelsbrunner H. Geometry and Topology for Mesh Generation 2001, Cambridge University Press, England.
18. Jr CW, LeFebvre B, Cammer SA, Tropsha A, Edgell MH. Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations. Journal of Molecular Biology 2001, 311:625-638. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4906, 11518520.
19. Masso M, Lu Z, Vaisman II. Computational Mutagenesis Studies of Protein Structure-Function Correlations. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2006, 64:234-245.
20. Taylor TJ, Rivera M, Wilson G, Vaisman II. New method for protein secondary structure assignment based on a simple topological descriptor. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2005, 60(3):513-524.
21. Bostick DL, Shen M, Vaisman II. A simple topological representation of protein structure: Implications for new, fast, and robust structural classification. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2004, 56(3):486-501.
22. Huan J, Bandyopadhyay D, Wang W, Snoeyink J, Prins J, Tropsha A. Comparing Graph Representations of Protein Structure for Mining Family-Specific Residue-Based Packing Motifs. Journal of Computational Biology 2005, 12(6):657-671. 10.1089/cmb.2005.12.657, 16108709.
23. Taylor TJ, Vaisman II. Graph theoretic properties of networks formed by the Delaunay tessellation of protein structures. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics) 2006, 73(4):041925.
24. Edelsbrunner H, Koehl P. The geometry of biomolecular solvation. Combinatorial and Computational Geometry 2005, 52:243-275. MSRI Publications.
25. Smialowski P, Martin-Galiano AJ, Mikolajika A, Girschick T, Holak TA, Frishman D. Protein solubility: sequence based prediction and experimental verification. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(19):2536-2542. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl623, 17150993.
26. Wilkinson DL, Harrison RG. Predicting the Solubility of Recombinant Proteins in Escherichia coli. Nature Biotechnology 1991, 9:443-448.
27. Mitchell TM. Machine Learning 1997, McGraw Hill, 1.
28. Vapnik VN. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, Wiley and Sons Inc.
29. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. Least angle regression. Annals of Statistics 2004, 32:407-499.
30. Tibshirani R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 1996, 58:267-288.
31. Lee B, Richards F. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. Journal of Molecular Biology 1971, 55(3):379-400. IN3-IN4, 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-X, 5551392.
32. McConkey B, Sobolev V, Edelman M. Quantification of protein surfaces, volumes and atom-atom contacts using a constrained Voronoi procedure. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(10):1365-1373. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.10.1365, 12376381.
33. Cavallo L, Kleinjung J, Fraternali F. POPS: a fast algorithm for solvent accessible surface areas at atomic and residue level. Nucleic Acids Research 2003, 31(13):3364-3366. 10.1093/nar/gkg601, 169007, 12824328.
34. Wang G, Jr R. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. 2003,
35. Watson D. CONTOURING: A guide to the analysis and display of spatial data 1992, Pergamon Press.
36. Kumar MS, Bava KA, Gromiha MM, Prabakaran P, Kitajima K, Uedaira H, Sarai A. ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34:D204-D206. 10.1093/nar/gkj103, 1347465, 16381846.
37. Supplementary Materials and Executable programs for this paper. , http://www.wsu.edu/~kbala/OptSolMut.html
38. Liu J, Boucher Y, Stokes H, Ollis D. Improving protein solubility: the use of the Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase gene as a fusion reporter. Protein Expression and Purification 2006, 47:258-63. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.11.019, 16403649.
39. Varadarajan R, Nagarajaram H, Ramakrishnan C. A procedure for the prediction of temperature-sensitive mutants of a globular protein based solely on the amino acid sequence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93(24):13908-13913. 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13908, 19465, 8943034.
40. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines 2001, http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
41. Matthews B. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochem Biophys Acta 405 1975, 442-451.
42. Chen KM, Martemyanova N, Lu Y, Shindo K, Matsuo H, Harris RS. Extensive mutagenesis experiments corroborate a structural model for the DNA deaminase domain of APOBEC3G. FEBS letters 2007, 581:4761-4766. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.08.076, 2014798, 17869248.
43. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics 1996, 14:33-38. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5, 8744570.
44. Dale GE, Broger C, Langen H, Arcy AD, Stüber D. Improving protein solubility through rationally designed amino acid replacements: solubilization of the trimethoprim-resistant type S1 dihydrofolate reductase. Protein Eng 1994, 7(7):933-939. 10.1093/protein/7.7.933, 7971955.
45. Trevino SR, Scholtz J, Pace C. Amino Acid Contribution to Protein Solubility: Asp, Glu, and Ser Contribute more Favorably than the other Hydrophilic Amino Acids in RNase Sa. Journal of Molecular Biology 2007, 366(2):449-460. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.026, 2771383, 17174328.
46. de Groot N, Aviles F, Vendrell J, Ventura S. Mutagenesis of the central hydrophobic cluster in Ab42 Alzheimer's peptide. FEBS Journal 2006, 273(3):658-668. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05102.x, 16420488.
47. Adachi K, Konitzer P, Kim J, Welch N, Surrey S. Effects of beta 6 aromatic amino acids on polymerization and solubility of recombinant hemoglobins made in yeast. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 1993, 268:21650-21656.
48. Fisher A, Kim W, DeLisa M. Genetic selection for protein solubility enabled by the folding quality control feature of the twin-arginine translocation pathway. Protein Science 2006, 15(3):449-58. 10.1110/ps.051902606, 2249766, 16452624.
49. Peabody DS, Al-Bitar L. Isolation of viral coat protein mutants with altered assembly and aggregation properties. Nucleic Acids Research 2001, 29(22):e113. 10.1093/nar/29.22.e113, 92581, 11713333.
50. van den Berg S, Löfdahl P, Härd T, Berglund H. Improved solubility of TEV protease by directed evolution. Journal of Biotechnology 2006, 121(3):291-298. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.08.006, 16150509.
51. Idicula-Thomas S, Balaji PV. Understanding the relationship between the primary structure of proteins and its propensity to be soluble on overexpression in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci 2005, 14(3):582-592. 10.1110/ps.041009005, 2279285, 15689506.
52. Sim J, Sim T. Amino acid substitutions affecting protein solubility: high level expression of streptomyces clavuligerus isopenicillin N synthase in Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 1999, 6(3):133-143.
53. Japrung D, Chusacultanachai S, Yuvaniyama J, Wilairat P, Yuthavong Y. A simple dual selection for functionally active mutants of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase with improved solubility. Protein Eng Des Sel 2005, 18(10):457-64. 10.1093/protein/gzi044, 16120637.
54. Maxwell KL, Mittermaier AK, Forman-Kay JD, Davidson AR. A simple in vivo assay for increased protein solubility. Protein Science 1999, 8(9):1908-1911. 10.1110/ps.8.9.1908, 2144404, 10493593.
55. Boeshans K, Liu F, Peng G, Idler W, Jang S, Marekov L, Black L, Ahvazi B. Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the phage T4 vertex protein gp24 and its mutant forms. Protein Expr Purif 2006, 49(2):235-43. 10.1016/j.pep.2006.05.021, 16884923.
56. Sun ZYJ, Dotsch V, Kim M, Li J, Reinherz EL, Wagner G. Functional glycan-free adhesion domain of human cell surface receptor CD58: design, production and NMR studies. The EMBO journal 1999, 18(11):2941-9. 10.1093/emboj/18.11.2941, 1171376, 10357807.
57. Wigley WC, Stidham RD, Smith NM, Hunt JF, Thomas PJ. Protein solubility and folding monitored in vivo by structural complementation of a genetic marker protein. Nature Biotechnology 2001, 19:131-136. 10.1038/84389, 11175726.