Integration of cryo-EM with atomic and protein-protein interaction data

Methods in Enzymology

Volumn 483, Issue C, 2010, Pages 47-72

  Förster, Friedrich ^a   Villa, Elizabeth ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; PROTEASOME;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BOOK; COMPLEX FORMATION; CROSS LINKING; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DNA TEMPLATE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 77957260973     PISSN: 00766879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)83003-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Alber F., et al. Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature 2007, 450:683-694.
2. Alber F., et al. Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:443-477.
3. Aloy P., Russell R.B. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:5896-5901.
4. Aloy P., Russell R.B. Potential artefacts in protein-interaction networks. FEBS Lett. 2002, 530:253-254.
5. Aloy P., et al. A complex prediction: Three-dimensional model of the yeast exosome. EMBO Rep. 2002, 3:628-635.
6. Becker T., et al. Structure of monomeric yeast and mammalian Sec61 complexes interacting with the translating ribosome. Science 2009, 326:1369-1373.
7. Biegert A., et al. The MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit for protein sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:W335-W339.
8. Brenner S.E., et al. Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95:6073-6078.
9. Brohawn S.G., et al. The nuclear pore complex has entered the atomic age. Structure 2009, 17:1156-1168.
10. Brunger A.T., et al. Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science 1987, 235:458-460.
11. Connell S.R., et al. Structural basis for interaction of the ribosome with the switch regions of GTP-bound elongation factors. Mol. Cell 2007, 25:751-764.
12. DiMaio F., Tyka M.D., Baker M.L., Chiu W., Baker D. Refinement of protein structures into low-resolution density maps using rosetta. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 392:181-190.
13. Djuranovic S., et al. Structure and activity of the N-terminal substrate recognition domains in proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:580-590.
14. Eswar N., Sali A. Comparative modeling of drug target proteins. Computer-Assisted Drug Design 2007, 215-236. Elsevier, Oxford. J. Taylor, D. Triggle (Eds.).
15. Eswar N., et al. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2007, Chapter 2, Unit 2 9.
16. Fabiola F., Chapman M.S. Fitting of high-resolution structures into electron microscopy reconstruction images. Structure 2005, 13:389-400.
17. Fields S. High-throughput two-hybrid analysis. The promise and the peril. FEBS J. 2005, 272:5391-5399.
18. Finley D., et al. Unified nomenclature for subunits of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome regulatory particle. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23:244-245.
19. Förster F., Hegerl R. Structure determination in situ by averaging of tomograms. Methods Cell Biol. 2007, 79:741-767.
20. Förster F., et al. Retrovirus envelope protein complex structure in situ determined by cryo-electron tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:4729-4734.
21. Förster F., et al. An atomic model AAA-ATPase/20S core particle sub-complex of the 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 388:228-233.
22. Förster F., Lasker K., Nickell S., Sali A., Baumeister W. Towards an integrated structural model of the 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 9:1666-1677.
23. Frickey T., Lupas A.N. Phylogenetic analysis of AAA proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 2004, 146:2-10.
24. Goddard T.D., et al. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 2007, 157:281-287.
25. Grünewald K., et al. Three-dimensional structure of herpes simplex virus from cryo-electron tomography. Science 2003, 302:1396-1398.
26. Habeck M., et al. Weighting of experimental evidence in macromolecular structure determination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:1756-1761.
27. Jaynes E.T. Probability theory: The logic of science 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK).
28. Jiang W., et al. Bridging the information gap: Computational tools for intermediate resolution structure interpretation. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 308:1033-1044.
29. Jones D.T. GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 287:797-815.
30. Kaelin W.G., et al. Identification of cellular proteins that can interact specifically with the T/E1A-binding region of the retinoblastoma gene product. Cell 1991, 64:521-532.
31. Karplus M., McCammon J.A. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9:646-652.
32. Lasker K., Phillips J.L., Russel D., Velázquez-Muriel J., Schneidman-Duhovny D., Tjioe E., Webb B., Schlessinger A., Sali A. Integrative Structure Modeling of Macromolecular Assemblies from Proteomics Data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:1689-1702.
33. Leitner A., Walzthoeni T., Kahraman A., Herzog F., Rinner O., Beck M., Aebersold R. Probing native protein structures by chemical cross-linking, mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:1634-1649.
34. Liu Q., et al. Reconstitution, activities, and structure of the eukaryotic RNA exosome. Cell 2006, 127:1223-1237.
35. Lorentzen E., et al. The archaeal exosome core is a hexameric ring structure with three catalytic subunits. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:575-581.
36. Lowe J., et al. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science 1995, 268:533-539.
37. Lupas A., et al. Self-compartmentalizing proteases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1997, 22:399-404.
38. Maiolica A., et al. Structural analysis of multiprotein complexes by cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and database searching. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6:2200-2211.
39. Marti-Renom M.A., et al. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2000, 29:291-325.
40. Nickell S., et al. Insights into the molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:11943-11947.
41. Pettersen E.F., et al. UCSF Chimera-A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25:1605-1612.
42. Raijmakers R., et al. Protein-protein interactions between human exosome components support the assembly of RNase PH-type subunits into a six-membered PNPase-like ring. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 323:653-663.
43. Rosenthal P.B., Henderson R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 333:721-745.
44. Saad A., et al. Fourier amplitude decay of electron cryomicroscopic images of single particles and effects on structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 2001, 133:32-42.
45. Sali A., Blundell T.L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 234:779-815.
46. Schueler-Furman O., et al. Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Science 2005, 310:638-642.
47. Seidelt B., et al. Structural insight into nascent polypeptide chain-mediated translational stalling. Science 2009, 326:1412-1415.
48. Sharon M., Robinson C.V. The role of mass spectrometry in structure elucidation of dynamic protein complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007, 76:167-193.
49. Shi J., et al. FUGUE: Sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 310:243-257.
50. Sinz A. Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry for mapping three-dimensional structures of proteins and protein complexes. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38:1225-1237.
51. Soding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:951-960.
52. Soding J., et al. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:W244-W248.
53. Striebel F., et al. Controlled destruction: AAA+ ATPases in protein degradation from bacteria to eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:209-217.
54. Suhre K., et al. NORMA: A tool for flexible fitting of high-resolution protein structures into low-resolution electron-microscopy-derived density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006, 62:1098-1100.
55. Tomko R.J., et al. Heterohexameric ring arrangement of the eukaryotic proteasomal ATPases: Implications for proteasome structure and assembly. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:393-403.
56. Topf M., et al. Structural characterization of components of protein assemblies by comparative modeling and electron cryo-microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2005, 149:191-203.
57. Towbin H., et al. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: Procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76:4350-4354.
58. Trabuco L.G., et al. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 2008, 16:673-683.
59. Vale R.D. AAA proteins. Lords of the ring. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150:F13-F19.
60. Voges D., et al. The 26S proteasome: A molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68:1015-1068.
61. Volkmann N., Hanein D. Quantitative fitting of atomic models into observed densities derived by electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 1999, 125:176-184.
62. Wriggers W., Chácon P. Modeling tricks and fitting techniques for multiresolution structures. Structure 2001, 9:779-788.
63. Wriggers W., et al. Situs: A package for docking crystal structures into low-resolution maps from electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 1999, 125:185-195.
64. Yu, et al. Interactions of PAN's C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions. EMBO J. 2010, 29:692-702.
65. Zhang F., et al. Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:473-484.
66. Zhou H.X., Qin S. Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: A critical assessment. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2203-2209.