The relation between self-regulation and the embedding of support in learning environments

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 573-587

  Clarebout, Geraldine ^a   Horz, Holger ^b   Schnotz, Wolfgang ^c   Elen, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^c Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Goal orientation; Learner control; Learning environments; Self regulation; Support devices

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957111146     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-009-9147-4     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277-320.
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3. Arbreton, A. (1998). Student goal orientation and help-seeking strategy use. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 95-117). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
5. Carrier, C., Davidson, G., Williams, M., & Kalweit, C. M. (1986). Instructional options and encouragement effects in a micro-computer concept lesson. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 222-229.
6. Chapelle, C., & Mizuno, S. (1989). Students' strategies with learner-controlled CALL. Calico Journal, 7(2), 25-47.
7. Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2006). Tool use in computer-based learning environments: Towards a research framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 389-411.
8. Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2008). Advice on tool use in open learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17, 81-97.
9. Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2009). The complexity of tool use in computer based environments. Instructional Science, 37, 474-486.
10. Clark, R. E. (1990). When teaching kills learning: Research on mathetmathantics. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), European research in an international context: Volume 2. Learning and Instruction (pp. 1-22). Oxford, NY: Pergamon Press.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychology, 41, 1040-1048.
13. Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2005). Opportunities for formative assessment: Use and effect. Rome: Paper presented at the EADTU conference.
14. Elliot, J. A., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
15. Elshout, J. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hall, J. G. (1993). Using the computer as a help tool during learning by doing. Computer and Education, 21(1-2), 115-122.
16. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
17. Friend, C. L., & Cole, C. L. (1990). Learner control in computer-based instruction: A current literature review. Educational Technology, 30(11), 47-49.
18. Goforth, D. (1994). Learner control = decision making + information: A model and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(1), 1-26.
19. Gräsel, C., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2000). The use of additional information in problem-oriented learning environments. Learning Environment Research, 3, 287-325.
20. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007, April). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the development of sophisticated mental models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
21. Greene, B. A., & Land, S. M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 151-179.
22. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
24. Horz, H., Winter, C., & Fries, S. (2009). Differential effects of situated prompts on learning behaviour in authentic simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 818-828.
25. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Large, A. (1996). Hypertext instructional program and learner control: A research review. Education for Information, 14, 95-106.
27. Lee, Y. B., & Lehman, J. D. (1993). Instructional cueing in hypermedia: A study with active and passive learners. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(1), 25-37.
28. Martens, R. L., Valcke, M. M., & Portier, S. J. (1997). Interactive learning environments to support independent learning: The impact of discernability of embedded scaffolds. Computers in Education, 28, 185-197.
29. Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1126-1144.
30. Nederkoorn, C., Guerrieri, R., & Jansen, A. (2006). Leven in Luilekkerland [Living in wonderland]. De Psycholoog, 41(1), 10-16.
31. Newman, R. S. (1998). Students' help seeking during problem solving: Influences of personal and contextual achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 644-658.
32. Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1995). Students' help seeking during problem solving: Effects of grade, goal, and prior achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 352-376.
33. Niemiec, R. P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(2), 157-175.
34. Perkins, D. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14, 11-17.
35. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego: Academic Press.
36. Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529-556.
37. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). "Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329-341.
38. Schnotz, W., & Heiß, A. (2009). Semantic scaffolds in hypermedia learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 371-380.
39. Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Educational Journal, 6, 261-271.
40. Uduma, L., & Morrison, G. R. (2007). How do instructional designers use automated instructional design tool? Computer in Human Behavior, 23, 536-553.
41. Vermunt, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.
42. Viau, R., & Lariveé, J. (1993). Learning tools with hypertext: An experiment. Computers & Education, 20, 11-16.
43. Wild, K.-P. (2000). Lernstrategien im Studium. Strukturen und Bedingungen [Learning Strategie in Academic Studies Structures an Conditions]. Münster: Waxmann.
44. Wild, K.-P., & Schiefele, U. (1994). Lernstrategien im Studium. Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens [Learning strategies in academic studies. Results about factor structure and reliability of a new questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 185-200.
45. Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 957-983). New York: Macmillan Library.
46. Winne, P. H. (2005). Key issues in modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 232-238.
47. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students' calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551-572.
48. Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. A. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 429-444.
49. Wirth, J. (2005). Selbstreguliertes Lernen in komplexen und dynamischen Situationen. Die Nutzung von Handlungsdaten zur Erfassung verschiedener Aspekte der Lernprozess-regulation. In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis Learning Strategies and Metacognition: Implications for Research and Practice (pp. 101-127). Waxmann: Münster.