The complexity of tool use in computer-based learning environments

Instructional Science

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 475-486

  Clarebout, Geraldine ^a   Elen, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Advice; Computer based learning environment; Instructional design; Learner characteristics; Learning opportunities

Indexed keywords

EID: 71449113911     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-008-9068-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277-320. doi: 10. 3102/00346543073003277.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
3. Carrier, C., Davidson, G., Williams, M., & Kalweit, C. M. (1986). Instructional options and encouragement effects in a micro-computer concept lesson. The Journal of Educational Research, 79, 222-229.
4. Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2006). Tool use in computer-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 389-411. doi: 10. 1016/j. chb. 2004. 09. 007.
5. Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2008). Advise on tool use in open learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 81-97.
6. Clarebout, G., Sarfo, F. K., & Elen, J. (2004a). Measuring instructional conceptions with the ICON-questionnaire (internal report). Leuven, BE: Center for Instructional Psychology and Technology.
7. Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Lowyck, J., van den Ende, J., & van den Enden, E. (2004b). KABISA: Evaluation of an open learning environment. In A.-M. Armstrong (Ed.), Instructional design in the real world. A view from the trenches (pp. 119-135). Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
8. Clark, R. E. (1990). When teaching kills learning: Research on mathematics. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), European research in an international context: Learning and instruction (Vol. 2, pp. 1-22). Oxford, NY: Pergamon Press.
9. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (2002). Turning research into results: A guide to selecting the right performance solutions. Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.
10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshow, (1989). User acceptance of computer technology. A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
11. Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2006). The use of instructional interventions: Lean learning environments as a solution for a design problem. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory (pp. 185-200). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Elen, J., Lowyck, J., & Proost, K. (1996). Design of telematic learning environments: A cognitive mediational view. Educational Research and Evaluation. An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 2, 213-230.
13. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189. doi: 10. 1207/s15326985ep3403_3.
14. Gräsel, C., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2001). The use of additional information in problem-oriented learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 3, 287-325. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1011421732004.
15. Greene, B. A., & Land, S. M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 151-179. doi: 10. 2190/1GUB-8UE9-NW80-CQAD.
16. Hannafin, M. J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended learning environments: Assumptions, methods and implications. Educational Technology, 34(10), 48-55.
17. Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.
18. Kester, L. (2003). Timing of information presentation and the acquisition of complex skills. Doctoral dissertation, Heerlen, NL: Open University.
19. Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2008). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students' motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 36-51. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8535. 2007. 00751. x.
20. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61-78. doi: 10. 1007/BF02319858.
21. Lee, Y. B., & Lehman, J. D. (1993). Instructional cueing in hypermedia: A study with active and passive learners. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(1), 25-37.
22. Lowyck, J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2004). Instructional conceptions: Analysis from an instructional design perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 429-444. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijer. 2005. 08. 010.
23. Nederkoorn, C., Guerrieri, R., & Jansen, A. (2006). Leven in Luilekkerland [Living in wonderland]. De Psycholoog, 41(1), 10-16.
24. Newman, R. S. (1998). Adaptive help seeking: A role of social interaction in self-regulated learning. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Help-seeking strategies. Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 13-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Newman, R. S., & Goldin, L. (1990). Children's reluctance to seek help with schoolwork. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 92-100. doi: 10. 1037/0022-0663. 82. 1. 92.
26. Perkins, D. N. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14, 11-17.
27. Relan, A. (1995). Promoting better choices: Effect of strategy training on achievement and choice behaviour in learning controlled computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 129-149. doi: 10. 2190/XFM5-1FUT-4UBB-R64K.
28. Roll, I., Baker, R. S., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Modeling students' metacognitive errors in two intelligent tutoring systems. In L. Adrissono, P. Brna, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), User modelling 2005 (pp. 379-388). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
29. Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 528-535. doi: 10. 1037/0022-0663. 90. 3. 528.
30. Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 93-114. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1009013420053.
31. Sarfo, F. K., & Elen, J. (2008). The moderating effect of instructional conceptions on the effect of powerful learning environments. Instructional Science, 36, 137-154.
32. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method design? In B. Moschner & C. Artelt (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75-97). Berlin: Waxmann.
33. Vermunt, J. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs: Naar procesgerichte instructie en zelfstandig denken [Learning styles and coaching learning processes in Higher Education]. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.
34. Winne, P. H. (1985). Steps towards cognitive achievements. Journal of Elementary School Journal, 85, 673-693. doi: 10. 1086/461429.
35. Winne, P. H. (2004). Students' calibration of knowledge and learning processes: Implications for designing powerful software learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 466-488. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijer. 2005. 08. 012.