Teachers' continuing professional development: Framing a model of outcomes

Journal of In-Service Education

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 71-84

  Harland, John ^a   Kinder, Kay ^a  

^a NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011132837     PISSN: 13674587     EISSN: 17475082     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674589700200005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bolam, R., 1994. The impact of research on policy and practice in continuing professional development. British Journal of In-service Education, 20:35–46.
2. Day, C., 1993. Research and the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers, Nottingham:University of Nottingham.
3. Dormer, J., and Foster, M., 1995. Staff Development Services in Devon:an evaluative study, Exeter:Devon Education Staff Development Unit, Devon County Council.
4. Eraut, M., 1994. Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, London:Falmer Press.
5. Fullan, M. G., and Stiegelbauer, S., 1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change, Cassell:London.
6. Fullan, M. G., 1993. Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50:12–17.
7. Galloway, S., 1989. Identifying INSET Needs:the case of Solihull schools, Warwick:Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research.
8. Hall, V., and Oldroyd, D., 1988. Managing INSET in Local Education Authorities, Bristol:National Development Centre for School Management Training.
9. Harland, J., 1990. The Work and Impact of Advisory Teachers, Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research.
10. Harland, J., and Kinder, K., 1992. Mathematics and Science Courses for Primary Teachers:lessons for the future, Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research, Department of Education and Science.
11. Harland, J., Kinder, K., and Keys, W., 1993. Restructuring INSET:privatisation and its alternatives, Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research.
12. Joyce, B., and Showers, B., 1980. Improving in-service training:the messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37:379–385.
13. Kinder, K., and Harland, J., 1991. The Impact of INSET:the case of primary science, Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research.
14. Kinder, K., Harland, J., and Wootten, M., 1991. The Impact of School-focused INSET on Classroom Practice, Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research.
15. Law, S., and Glover, D., 1995. The professional development business:school evaluations of LEA and higher education INSET provision. British Journal of In-service Education, 21:181–192.
16. Lubben, F., and Campbell, B., 1995. In-service Support for a Technological Approach to Science Education, London:Overseas Development Administration.
17. McBride, R., 1989. The In-service Training of Teachers, Lewes:Falmer Press.
18. McMahon, A., and Ballard, H., Continuing professional development for secondary teachers. September14-17. paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research(ECER), University of Bath.
19. Schön, D., 1971. Beyond the Stable State, New York:Norton.
20. Sockett, H., 1993. The Moral Base for Teacher Professionalism, New York:Teachers College Press.
21. Steadman, S., Eraut, M., Fielding, M., and Horton, A., 1995. Making School-based INSET Effective, Brighton:University of Sussex Institute of Education.
22. Webb, R., 1989. Changing practice through consultancy-based INSET. School Organisation, 9:39–51.