What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries?

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1099-1118

  Ambos, Tina C ^a   Andersson, Ulf ^b   Birkinshaw, Julian ^c  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^b Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

^c LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

headquarters subsidiary roles and relations; resource dependence; strategic initiative

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956693172     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2010.19     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2005. In search for global advantage. European Business Forum, 21: 23-24.
2. Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2007. Innovation and control in the multinational firm: A comparison of political and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5): 473-486.
3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411-423.
4. Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. 1996. Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5(5): 487-508.
5. Andersson, U., & Pahlberg, C. 1997. Subsidiary influence on strategic behaviour in MNCs: An empirical study. International Business Review, 6(3): 319-334.
6. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 802-818.
7. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating non response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3): 396-402.
8. Asakawa, K. 2001. Evolving headquarters-subsidiary dynamics in international R&D: The case of Japanese multinationals. R&D Management, 31(1): 1-14.
9. Asmussen, C. G., Pedersen, T., & Dhanaraj, C. 2008. Hostcountry environment and subsidiary competence: Extending the diamond network model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 42-57.
10. Astley, W. G., & Sachdeva, P. S. 1984. Structural sources of intraorganizational power: A theoretical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 9(1): 104-113.
11. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12. Benito, G. R. G., Grogaard, B., & Narula, R. 2003. Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: Economic integration and the Nordic countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(5): 443-456.
13. Bentler, P. M. 1980. Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 419-456.
14. Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207-229.
15. Birkinshaw, J., & Fry, N. 1998. Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets. Sloan Management Review, 39(3): 51-61.
16. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.
17. Birkinshaw, J., & Ridderstrale, J. 1999. Fighting the corporate immune system: A process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review, 8(2): 149-180.
18. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221-241.
19. Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C., & Ambos, T. C. 2007. Managing executive attention in the global company. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(4): 39-45.
20. Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
21. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. 1993. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 577-601.
23. Bower, J. L. 1970. Managing the resource allocation process. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
24. Boyd, B. K., Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A. M. A. 1993. Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18(2): 204-226.
25. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. 1989. Single sample crossvalidation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(4): 445-455.
26. Burgelman, R. A. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2): 223-244.
27. Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109-1128.
28. Chandler, A. D. 1991. The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Special Issue): 31-50.
29. Chatfield, C. 1988. A statistician's guide. London: Chapman & Hall.
30. Coff, R. W. 1999. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10(1): 119-133.
31. D'Aveni, R., & MacMillan, I. C. 1990. Crises and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4): 634-657.
32. Day, G. S., & Nedungadi, P. 1994. Managerial representations of competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 58(2): 31-44.
33. Deci, E. L. 1980. The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Heath.
34. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
35. Delany, E. 2000. Strategic development of the multinational subsidiary through subsidiary initiative-taking. Long Range Planning, 33(2): 220-244.
36. Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
37. Dörrenbächer, C., & Gammelgaard, J. 2006. Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro-political headquarters-subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries. Journal of International Management, 12(3): 266-283.
38. Doz, Y. L., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2001. From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
39. Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3): 397-428.
40. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
41. Ferner, A. 2000. The underpinnings of ''bureaucratic'' control systems: HRM in European multinationals. Journal of Management Studies, 37(4): 521-539.
42. Fornell, C., & Larker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
43. Forsgren, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. 1999. Accounting for the strengths of MNC subsidiaries: The case of foreign-owned firms in Denmark. International Business Review, 8(2): 181-196.
44. Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. 2005. Managing the embedded multinational: A business network view. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
45. Foss, K., & Foss, N. 2005. Resources and transaction costs: How property rights economics furthers the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6): 541-553.
46. Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. 2002. Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1): 1-19.
47. Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1996. The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in hightechnology, multidivisional corporations. Organization Science, 7(3): 255-282.
48. Gates, S. R., & Egelhoff, W. G. 1986. Centralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(2): 71-92.
49. Gerbing, D., & Anderson, J. 1988. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2): 186-192.
50. Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 323-337.
51. Ghoshal, S., Korine, H., & Szulanski, G. 1994. Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Science, 40(1): 96-110.
52. Gong, Y. 2006. The impact of subsidiary top management team national diversity on subsidiary performance: Knowledge and legitimacy perspectives. Management International Review, 46(6): 771-789.
53. Griffin, R. 2007. Heterarchy and the subaltern of subsidiary strategy: Deconstructing subsidiary managers' stories, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Waterford Institute of Technology (Ireland).
54. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. 1995. Multivariate data analysis with readings, (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. Harzing, A.-W. 1999. Managing the multinational. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
56. Harzing, A.-W. 2000. Cross national industrial mail surveys: Why do response rates differ between countries? Industrial Marketing Management, 29(3): 243-254.
57. Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNC: A heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1): 9-35.
58. Hillman, A. J., & Wan, W. P. 2005. The determinants of MNE subsidiaries' political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 322-340.
59. Holm, U., & Pedersen, T. (Eds), 2000. The emergence and impact of MNC centers of excellence. London: Macmillan.
60. Jarillo, J. C., & Martinez, J. I. 1990. Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7): 501-512.
61. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. 1993. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.
63. Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308-324.
64. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64-81.
65. Ling, Y., Floyd, S. W., & Baldridge, D. C. 2005. Toward a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 637-654.
66. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
67. Mudambi, R. 1999. MNE internal capital markets and subsidiary strategic independence. International Business Review, 8(2): 197-211.
68. Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385-406.
69. Mudambi, R., & Pedersen, T. 2007. Agency theory and resource dependency theory: Complementary explanations for subsidiary power in multinational corporations. In T. Pedersen & H. Volberda (Eds), Bridging IB theories, constructs, and methods across cultures and social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
70. Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. 1994. Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6): 491-502.
71. Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue): 187-206.
72. O'Donnell, S. W. 2000. Managing foreign subsidiaries: Agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 525-548.
73. Paterson, S. L., & Brock, D. M. 2002. The development of subsidiary-management research: Review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review, 11(2): 139-163.
74. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
75. Piercy, N., & Morgan, N. 1991. Internal marketing: The missing half of the marketing programme. Long Range Planning, 24(2): 82-93.
76. Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. 1995. A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5): 1224-1260.
77. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531-544.
78. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-903.
79. Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. 1991. Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 340-361.
80. Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715-735.
81. Roth, K., & Nigh, D. 1992. The effectiveness of headquarters- subsidiary relationships: The role of coordination, control and conflict. Journal of Business Research, 25(4): 277-301.
82. Roth, K., Schweiger, D., & Morrison, A. J. 1991. Global strategy implementation at the business unit level: Operational capabilities and administrative mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3): 369-402.
83. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237-250.
84. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1977. An examination of needsatisfaction models of job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(3): 427-456.
85. Schmid, S. 2003. The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: Disentangling the role of the subsidiary's business network. International Business Review, 12(6): 755-782.
86. Science Council of Canada. 1980. Multinationals and industrial strategy: The role of world product mandates. Ottawa: Science Council of Canada, Supply and Services.
87. Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 681-697.
88. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 315-349.
89. Taggart, J. H. 1997. Autonomy and procedural justice: A framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1): 51-76.
90. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157): 1124-1131.
91. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3): 357-381.
92. Young, S., & Tavares, A. T. 2004. Centralization and autonomy: Back to the future. International Business Review, 13(2): 215-237.