Regulatory framework

Risk-Based Ship Design: Methods, Tools and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 97-151

  Skjong, Rolf ^a  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891391644     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89042-3_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (114)

1. Bahamas and Greece (2002) Consideration of the Strategy and Policy of the Organization Including the Report of the Working Group. IMO Strategic Plan C89/12/1.
2. Bottelberghs P H (1995) QRA in the Netherlands. Conference on Safety Cases, IBC/DNV, London.
3. Clarkson Research Studies (1999) Shipping IntelligenceWeekly. Issue No. 388, 1st October 1999, http://www.clarksons.co.uk/research/Denmark (1996) 'Officer of the Navigational Watch Acting as the Sole Look-Out in Periods of Darkness', MSC66/7/12.
4. Denmark (1996) Officer of the Navigational Watch Acting as the Sole Look-Out in Periods of Darkness. MSC66/7/12.
5. Denmark (1998) Safety in Navigation - Solo Watch-Keeping During Periods of Darkness. MSC69/21/6 with data and MSC69/INF.7 with a risk analysis.
6. Denmark (2007a) FSA - Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Carriers - Details of the Formal Safety Assessment. MSC83/INF.3.
7. Denmark (2007b) FSA - Container Vessels - Details of the Formal Safety Assessment. MSC83/INF.8.
8. Denmark (2008a) FSA - Crude Oil Tankers. MEPC58/17/2 and MEPC58/INF.2.
9. Denmark (2008b) FSA - Cruise Ships. MSC85/17/1 and MSC85/INF.2.
10. Denmark (2008c) FSA - RoPax. MSC85/17/2 and MSC 85/INF.3.
11. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (2007) Development of Carriage Requirements for ECDIS. Draft Amendments to SOLAS Regulation V/19, NAV53/INF.3.
12. Denmark and Norway (2005) Work Programme, Sub-Committees on Safety of Navigation (NAV) and on Standards of Training andWatch-keeping (STW). Proposal for a NewWork Programme Item for the NAV Sub-Committee on Carriage Requirements for ECDIS, and for the STW Sub- Committee on ECDIS Training and Familiarization' MSC83/23/13.
13. Denmark and Norway (2006) FSA Study on ECDIS/ENCs: Details on Risk Assessments and Cost Benefit Assessments. MSC81/INF.9.
14. DETR (1998) 1998 Valuation of the Benefits of Prevention of Road Accidents and Casualties. Highways Economics Note No. 1: 1998, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. www.roads.detr.gov.uk/roadsafety/ hen198/index.htm.
15. DNV (1992) Classification Note 30.6, Structural Reliability Analysis of Marine Structures.
16. DNV (1997a) Cost Benefit Analysis of Existing Bulk Carriers. Det Norske Veritas, Paper Series No. 97-P008.
17. DNV (1997b) Safety Assessment of Passenger/RoRo Vessels. Summary Report, North West European Project on Safety of Passenger Ro/Ro Vessels. DNV, N-1322 Hovik, Norway.
18. Drummond M F, Stoddart G L, Torrance G W (1987) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
19. DUAP (1997) Risk Criteria for Land Use Safety Planning. Hazardous Industry Planning Advisory Paper No.4, Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, Sydney.
20. Eknes M, Kvien M (1999) Historical Risk Levels in the Maritime Industry. DNV Report 99-2028.
21. Elvik R (1993) Okonomisk verdsetting av velferdstap ved trafikkulykker (Economic Valuation of Reduced Risk of Traffic Accidents). TOI report 203/1993, Institute of Transport Economics, December (In Norwegian).
22. EPA (1998) Risk Assessment and Management: Offsite Individual Risk from Hazardous Industrial Plant. Preliminary Guidance No. 2, Environmental Protection Authority.
23. Estonia (1997) Final Report on the Capsizing on 28 September 1994 in the Baltic Sea of the Ro Ro Passenger Vessel MV ESTONIA. The Joint Accident Investigation Commission of Estonia,Finland and Sweden.
24. EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol - A New Facility for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life. Health Policy, 16, pp 199-208.
25. Evans (1998) Automatic Train Protection and the Valuation of Statistical Life. ESRA Newsletter,January.
26. FHWA (1994) Motor Vehicle Accident Costs. US Federal Highway Administration, Technical Advisory T7570.2.
27. France (2002) International Collaborative Study - Step 2 of FSA. MSC 75/5/5.
28. Freeman R I, Moir G R (1993) What is Living PSA?. Nuclear Energy, ISSN 0140-4067, Vol 32,pp. 335-362.
29. Gafni A (1999) Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions: An Economist's Perspective. ACP Journal Club (http://www.acponline.org/).
30. Germany (1998) Safety in Navigation - Solo Watch-Keeping During Periods of Darkness MSC69/21/7.
31. Greece (2004) Comparative Study of Single and Double Side Skin Bulk Carriers. MSC78/5/1 and MSC78/INF.6.
32. Green E, Short S, Levy L (1998) Environmental and Health Risks - What Can We Learn from Public and Professional Concerns?. ICHEME Environmental Protection Bulletin, November.
33. HCGPD (1983) Hong Kong Government Planning Department 'Hong Kong Planning Standards & Guidelines. Chapter 11, Miscellaneous, Potentially Hazardous Installations'.
34. Horte T, Skjong R, Friis-Hansen P, Teixeira A P, Viejo de Francisco F (2007) ProbabilisticMethods Applied to Structural Design and Rule Development. Proceedings of RINA Conference on Developments in Classification and International Regulations, London, UK.
35. HSC (1991) Major Hazard Aspects of the Transport of Dangerous Substances. Health & Safety Commission, Advisory Committee on Dangerous Substances, HMSO, UK.
36. HSE (1991) Quantified Risk Assessment: Its Input to Decision Making.
37. HSE (1999) Reducing Risks, Protecting People. Discussion Document, Health & Safety Executive.
38. IACS (1999) Hazard Identification on the Watertight Integrity of the Fore end of Bulk Carriers. MSC 71/INF.7.
39. IACS (2001) Formal Safety Assessment - Fore-End Watertight Integrity. MSC 74/5/4.
40. IACS (2002) Bulk Carrier Safety - Side Shell Integrity Evaluation of Risk Control Options. MSC 76/INF.21.
41. IACS (2004) Experience with Formal Safety Assessment at IMO. MSC 78/19/1.
42. IACS (2006) Goal-Based New Ship Construction Standards. Linkage Between FSA and GBS,MSC81/INF.6 (Authors: R Skjong and T Horte, DNV
43. ICAO (1995) Civil Aviation Statistics of the World 1994. The International Civil Aviation Organization. http://www.icao.org.
44. IMO (1997) Interim Guidelines on the Application of Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) to the IMO Rule-Making Process. MSC Circ.829/MEPC Circ.335.
45. IMO (1998) Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on Its 70th Session. MSC70/23.
46. IMO (1999) Bulk Carrier Safety - Report of the Working Group. MSC 71/WP.3.
47. IMO (2001) Guidelines on the Application of Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) to the IMO Rule- Making Process. MSC Circ.1023/MEPC Circ.392.
48. IMO (2002a) Report from the Working Group on Bulk Carrier Safety. MSC 76/WP.16.
49. IMO (2002b) Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on Its 76th Session. MSC76/23.
50. IMO (2005) Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its 80th Session. MSC 80/24, Annex 1(Part B-1: Stability
51. IMO (2007) Consolidated text of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule-Making Process (MSC/Circ.1023-MEPC/ Circ.392). MSC83/INF.2.
52. IMO Secretary General (1999) Enhancing the Safety of Large Passenger Ships. Note by the Secretary-General, IMO 72/21.
53. INTERCARGO (2002) MSC 76/5/6 Submitted by International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners.
54. IPCC (2007) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers, Formally Approved at the 9th Session of Working Group III of the IPCC, Bangkok, Thailand. 30 April - 4 May
55. Japan (2001) Report on FSA Study on Bulk Carrier Safety. MSC 74/5/3.
56. Japan (2002a) Report on FSA Study on Bulk Carrier Safety MSC 75/5/2.
57. Japan (2002b) Consideration on Decision-Making Process from Independent FSA Studies. MSC 76/5/12.
58. Japan (2002c) Investigation on Hatch-Cover Related Casualties. MSC 76/5/13.
59. Japan (2006) Evaluation of the Use of ECDIS and ENC Development, Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness of ECDIS in Routes of Cargo Ships Considering ENC Coverage. NAV52/6/2.
60. Kaplan RM, Anderson J P (1988) A General Health Policy Model: Update and Application. Health Services Research, Vol 23, No 2, pp 203-235.
61. Kinchin G H (1978) Assessment of Hazards in Engineering Work. Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol 64, pp 431-38, 1978.
62. Kind P, Rosser R, Williams A (1982) Valuation of Quality of Life: Some Psychometric Evidence. In Jones-Lee, M.W. (ed): The Value of Life and Safety, pp.159-170. Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Company, 1982.
63. Lind N C (1996) Safety Principles and Safety Culture. Proceedings. 3rd International Summit on Safety at Sea, Conference organised by Norwegian Petroleum Society, Oslo, Norway.
64. Litai D (1980) A Risk Comparison Methodology for the Assessment of Acceptable Risk. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
65. LMIS (1999) Lloyds Maritime Information Systems Casualty Database. April.
66. MAIB (1998) Annual Report 1997. Marine Accident Investigation Branch, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
67. Marine Board (2001) Environmental Performance of Tanker Designs in Collision and Grounding, Committee for Evaluating Double-Hull Tanker Design Alternatives. Special Report 259, National Academy Press, ISBN 0-309-07240-9,Washington DC.
68. Marshall Island (2002) Hull Envelope Structural Failure of M/V LAKE CARLING. MSC 72/5/16.
69. Mathiesen T C (1997) Cost Benefit Analysis of Existing Bulk Carriers. DNV Paper Series No 97-P008.
70. Mathiesen T C, Skjong R (1996) Towards a Rational Approach to Maritime Safety and Environmental Regulations? Market Mechanisms for Safer Shipping and Cleaner Oceans. Erasmus University, MARE FORUM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
71. McGregor J (2007) Combining Risks, Risk Acceptability and Defining an ALARP Region for Oil Spills. POP&C Report D5.3, available at www.pop-c.org.
72. Natwani J S, Lind N C, PandeyMD (1997) Affordable Safety by Choice: The Life Quality Method. Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
73. Nord, E (1991), EuroQol: Health Related Quality of Life Measurement. Valuation of Health States by the General Public in Norway. Health Policy, Vol 18, pp. 25-36.
74. NordhausW(2008) A Question of Balance. ISBN 978-0-300-13748-4, Yale University press, New Haven and London.
75. Norway (1996) Stortingsproposisjon No 1 1996-97 (In Norwegian).
76. Norway (2000) Decision Parameters Including Risk Acceptance Criteria. MSC 72/16. (Authors: R Skjong and M Eknes).
77. Norway (2004) Large Passenger Ship Safety: Effective Voyage Planning for Large Passenger Ships, FSA - Large Passenger Ships - Navigational Safety. NAV/50/11/1.
78. Norway (2008) Development of Carriage Requirements for ECDIS, ECDIS and ENC Coverage - Application of Carriage Requirements for ECDIS. NAV 54/14, 28 March.
79. Norway and ICCL (1997) SOLAS Regulation III/28.2: Helicopter Landing Area (HLA) on Non Ro-Ro Passenger Ships. DE41/INF.2.
80. Norway & ICFTU (2001) Formal Safety Assessment of Life Saving Appliances for Bulk Carriers FSA/LSA/BC. MSC 74/5/5 (Authors: R Skjong and B.H Wentworth).
81. Otway H J, Cohen J J (1975) Revealed Preferences: Comments on the Starr Benefit-Risk Relationships. Vienna, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
82. Rackwitz R (2001) A New Approach for Setting Target Reliabilities. Safety, Risk and Reliability - Trends in Engineering.
83. Railtrack (1998) Railway Group Safety Plan 1998-1999. Safety & Standards Directorate, Railtrack, London.
84. Ramberg J A L, Sjoberg L (1997) The Cost-Effectiveness of Lifesaving Interventions in Sweden. Risk Analysis, Vol 17. No 4.
85. Rose J (1994) Risk Assessment - To Quantify or Not to Quantify? Is that the Question?. Conference on Practically Implementing Safety Case Regulations in the Transport Industry, IBC, London, March.
86. Rowe W D (1977) An Anatomy of Risk. New York, Wiley.
87. Rude E, Hamann R (2008) Derivation of Ship Systems Safety Criteria by Means of a Risk-Based Ship System Safety Analysis. OMAE2008-57248, Proceedings of ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering OMAE2008, June 15-20, Estoril, Portugal
88. Sames P C, Hamann R (2008) Towards Environmental Risk Acceptance Criteria. OMAE2008- 57257, Proceedings of ASME 27th International Conference on OffshoreMechanics and Arctic Engineering OMAE2008, June 15-20, Estoril, Portugal
89. Skjong R (2002) Setting Target Reliabilities by Marginal Safety Returns. Joint Committee on structural Safety (JCSS), Workshop on Reliability Based Code Calibration, Zurich, Switzerland, March 21-22.
90. Skjong R, Adamcik P, Eknes M L, Gran S, Spouge J (1997) Formal Safety Assessment of Helicopter Landing Area on Passenger Ships as a Safety Measure. DNV Report 97-2053. (Public as IMO/COMSAR 3/2 and IMO/DE 41 documents).
91. Skjong R, Bitner-Gregersen E, Cramer E, Croker A, Hagen O, Korneliussen G, Lacasse S, Lotsberg I, Nadim F, Ronold K O (1995) Guidelines for Off-Shore Structural Reliability Analysis
92. General. Det Norske Veritas Report No 95-2018. The Guidelines Are Available on the Internet at http://research.dnv.com/skj/OffGuide/SRAatHOME.pdf.
93. Skjong R, Bitner-Gregersen E M (2002) Cost Effectiveness of Hull Girder Safety. OMAE-2002-28494, Oslo, Norway, June.
94. Skjong R, Eknes M L (2000) Decision Parameters and Risk Acceptance Criteria. MSC 72/16.
95. Skjong R, Eknes M L (2001) Risk Acceptance and Economic Activity. ESREL.
96. Skjong R, EknesML (2002) Societal Risk and Societal Benefits. Risk Decision and Policy (2002), vol 7, pp 1-11, Published by Cambridge University Press c-Cambridge.
97. Skjong R, Ronold K (1998) Social Indicators and Risk Acceptance. OffshoreMechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, OMAE.
98. Skjong R, Ronold K (2002) So Much for Safety. OMAE-2002-28451, Oslo, June.
99. Skjong R, Wentworth B H (2001) Expert Judgement and Risk Perception. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE, Vol IV, pp 537-544, Stavanger, June 17-22.
100. Skjong R, Vanem E, Endresen O (2005) Risk Evaluation Criteria. SAFEDOR Report D452, available at www.safedor.org.
101. Speares S (1991) Enforcement Cost of OPA 90 Put at 11billion. Lloyds List 18/5 2001.
102. Starr C (1969) Social Benefits vs. Technological Risks. Science, Vol 165, pp. 1232-1238.
103. Statoil (1995) Risk Acceptance Criteria in the Statoil Group. Doc. No. K/KR-44, 01.05.95, Statoil, Norway.
104. Sweden (1998) Safety in Navigation - Solo Watch-Keeping During Periods of Darkness. MSC/INF.13.
105. Tengs T et al. (1995) Five Hundred Life-Saving Interventions and Their Cost Effectiveness. Risk Analysis, Vol 15, 369-391.
106. UK (1997) Trial Application to High-Speed Passenger Catamaran Vessels. MSC68/14/2 and MSC68/INF.6.
107. UK (1998a) Formal Safety Assessment - Report of the Intersessional Correspondence Group on Helicopter Landing Areas (HLAs). MSC70/14.
108. UK (1998b) Bulk Carrier Safety - Proposal for a Formal Safety Assessment of Bulk Carriers. MSC 70/4/Add.1 and 'Additional information in support of the formal safety assessment of bulk carriers' MSC 70/INF.14.
109. UK (2002a) International Collaborative FSA Study - Final Report. MSC 76/5/5.
110. UK (2002b) Effect of URS21 on Existing Hatch Covers of Bulk Carriers. MSC 76/5/3.
111. UK (2002c) Comments on the International Collaborative FSA Study Final Report and Review of Proposals. MSC 76/5/17.
112. UNDP (1990) United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
113. Wendel K (1968) Subdivision of Ships. Diamond Jubilee InternationalMeeting - 75th Anniversary SNAME, New York, Paper No 12, pp. 12-1/12-27
114. WHO (2000) Annual Report 2000. World Health Organization