Gender ratios for reading disability: Are there really more boys than girls who are low-progress readers?

Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 161-179

  Limbrick, Lisa ^a   Wheldall, Kevin ^a   Madelaine, Alison ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956245183     PISSN: 19404158     EISSN: 19404166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19404150802415781     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, R.M., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K.E. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67-84.
2. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3. Australian Council for Educational Research (1969). Primary reading survey, word knowledge test. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
4. Badian, N.A. (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study of stability, gender differences and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 138-148.
5. Barnett, D.W., VanDerHeyden, A.M., & Witt, J.C. (2007). Achieving science-based practice through Response to Intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 31-54.
6. Beaman, R., Wheldall, K., & Kemp, C. (2007). Recent research on troublesome classroom behaviour: A review. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 31, 45-60.
7. Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331-361.
8. Chan, D.W., Ho, C.S.-H., Tsang, S.-M., Lee, S.-H., & Chung, K.H.H. (2007). Prevalence, gender ratio and gender differences in reading-related cognitive abilities among Chinese children with dyslexia in Hong Kong. Educational Studies, 33, 249-265.
9. Chiu, M.M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 331-362.
10. Coltheart, M., & Prior, M. (2007). Learning to read in Australia. Canberra: Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.
11. Coutinho, M.J., Oswald, D.P., & Best, A.M. (2002). The influence of sociodemographics and gender on the disproportionate identification of minority students as having learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 49-59.
12. de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51-77.
13. Flannery, K.A., Liederman, J., Daly, L., & Schultz, J. (2000). Male prevalence for reading disability is found in a large sample of Black and White children free from ascertainment bias. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 433-442.
14. Fletcher, J.M., Denton, C., & Francis, D.J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 545-552.
15. Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Rouke, B.P., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555-561.
16. Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
17. Fuchs, D., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, L.S., Bryant, J., & Davis, G.N. (2008). Making "secondary intervention" work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21, 413-436.
18. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-Intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
19. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to responsiveness-to-intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
20. Hawke, J.L., Wadsworth, S.J., & DeFries, J.C. (2006). Genetic influences on reading difficulties in boys and girls: The Colorado twin study. Dyslexia, 12, 21-29.
21. Hawke, J.L., Wadsworth, S.J., Olson, R.K., & DeFries, J.C. (2007). Etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender and severity. Reading and Writing, 20, 13-25.
22. Hoskyn, M., & Swanson, H.L. (2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. School Psychology Review, 29, 102-119.
23. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004). Individuals with disabilities education improvement act of 2004, public law no. 108-1446. Retrieved 21 July, 2008, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbnamecheckentity1/4/checkentity108_cong_public_laws&docidcheckentity1/4/checkentityf:publ446.108.
24. Katusic, S.K., Colligan, R.C., Barbaresi, W.J., Schaid, D.J., & Jacobsen, S.J. (2001). Incidence of reading disability in a population-based birth cohort, 1976-1982. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76, 1081-1092.
25. Liederman, J., Kantrowitz, L., & Flannery, K. (2005). Male vulnerability to reading disability is not likely to be a myth: A call for new data. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 109-129.
26. Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2003). Defining dyslexia, comorbidity, teachers' knowledge of language and reading: A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 2-14.
27. MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., & Bocian, K.M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and what schools use: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314-326.
28. Miles, T.R., Haslum, M.N., & Wheeler, T.J. (1998). Gender ratio in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 27-55.
29. O'Malley, K.J., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., Fletcher, J.M., & Swank, P.R. (2002). Growth in precursor and reading-related skills: Do low-achieving and IQ-discrepant readers develop differently? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 19-34.
30. Pereira-Laird, J., Deane, F.P., & Bunnell, J. (1999). Defining reading disability using a multifaceted approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 59-71.
31. Prior, M., Samson, A., Smart, D., & Oberklaid, F. (1995). Reading disability in an Australian community sample. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 32-37.
32. Reid, N.A., & Elley, W.B. (1991). Progressive achievement tests. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
33. Reid, N.A., & Elley, W.B. (2001). Progressive achievement tests in reading. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
34. Robertson, G.J. (2001). Wide range achievement tests-expanded edition. Wilmington, NC: Wide Range.
35. Rutter, M., Caspi, A., Fergusson, D., Horwood, L.J., Goodman, R., Maughan, B., et al. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability: New findings from four epidemiological studies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2007-2012.
36. Share, D.L., & Silva, P.A. (2003). Gender bias in IQ-discrepancy and post-discrepancy definitions of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 4-14.
37. Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Escobar, M.D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 22, 998-1002.
38. Siegel, L.S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618-629.
39. Siegel, L.S., & Smythe, I.S. (2005). Reflections on research on reading disability with special attention to gender issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 473-477.
40. Skarbrevik, K. (2002). Gender differences among students found eligible for special education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 97-107.
41. Sofie, C.A., & Riccio, C.A. (2002). A comparison of multiple methods for the identification of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 234-244.
42. Spencer, K. (2000). Is English a dyslexic language? Dyslexia, 6, 152-162.
43. Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350-361.
44. Stevenson, J. (1992). Identifying sex differences in reading disability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 307-326.
45. Thorpe, G.W. (1974). The Burt word reading test. Edinburgh, UK: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.
46. VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225-256.
47. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to Instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
48. Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). Wide range achievement tests 3. Wilmington, NC: Wide Range.
49. Wilkinson, G.S., & Robertson, G.J. (2006). Wide range achievement tests 4. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
50. Willcutt, E.G., & Pennington, B.F. (2000). Comorbidity of reading disability and Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder: Differences by gender and subtype. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 179-191.
51. Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III battery. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.