Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature

School Psychology Review

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 102-119

  Hoskyn, Maureen ^b   Swanson, H Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034418857     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. **refers to studies in meta-analysis
2. **Aaron, P. G. (1987). Developmental dyslexia: Is it different from other forms of reading disability? Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 109-125.
3. Aaron, P. G. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 3, 178-186.
4. Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502
5. Badian, N. A. (1993). Predicting reading progress in children receiving special help. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 90-109.
6. **Badian, N. A. (1994). Do dyslexic and other poor readers differ in reading-related cognitive skills? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 45-63.
7. **Badian, N. A. (1996). Dyslexia: A validation of the concept at two age levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29 (1), 102-112.
8. Becker, B. J. (1990). Coaching for the scholastic aptitude test: Further synthesis and appraisal. Review of Educational Research 60(3) 373-419.
9. Becker, B. J., & Schram, C. M. I. (1994). Examining explanatory models through research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 357-383). New York: Russell Sage. Foundation.
10. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11. Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 3-20). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
13. Brack, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874-886.
14. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: Academic Press.
16. Cronbach, L J.., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure "change" - or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
17. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
18. Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 733-740.
19. **Ellis, N., & Large, B. (1987). The development of reading: As you seek so you find. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 1-28.
20. Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. B. (1992). A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQ. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 318-326.
21. **Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Rourke, B. P., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 9, 555-561.
22. **Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P, Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 1, 6-23.
23. Fuchs, D., Mathes, P., Fuchs, L. & Lipsey, M. (in progress). Is LD just a fancy term for underachievers? To be submitted as a final report to the U.S. Department of Education.
24. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Davidson, K. C., & Thompson, N. M. (1991). Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 27-37.
25. **Fredman, G. & Stevenson, J. (1988). Reading processes in specific reading retarded and reading backward 13-year-olds. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 97-108.
26. Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 339-355). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Hayes, A. F. (1998). Within study meta-analysis: Pooling the significance of doubly nonindependent (nonoverlapping) correlations. Psychological Methods, 3(1), 32-45.
28. Hedges, L. V. (1994). Statistical considerations. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 29-38). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31. **Hurford, D. P., Schauf, J. D., Bunce, L., Blaich, T., & Moore, K. (1994). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 6, 371-382.
32. Kalain, H. A., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1996). A multivariate linear model for meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 1 (3), 227-235.
33. Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. Organizational Behavior and Hitman Performance, 27, 44-463.
34. **Johnston, R. S., Rugg. M. D., & Scott, T. (1987). Phonological similarity effects, memory span and developmental reading disorders: The nature of the relationship. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 205-211.
35. **Johnston, R. S., Rugg, M. D., & Scott, T. (1988). The influence of phonology on good and poor readers when reading for meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 57-68.
36. **Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L., MacLean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Cognitive factors at school entry predictive of specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27, 1, 45-54.
37. Kavale, K. & Forness, S. (1994). Learning disabilities and intelligence: An uneasy alliance. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 1-64). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
38. Lord, F. M. (1956). The measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 421-437.
39. Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Peterson, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in pre-school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263-284.
40. Reynolds, C. R. (1981). The fallacy of "two years below grade level for age as a diagnostic criterion for reading disorders. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 250-258.
41. Rogosa, D. R. (1988). Myths about longitudinal research. In K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. Meredith, & S. C. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research (pp. 171-210). New York: Springer-Verlag.
42. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file-drawer" problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 863-641.
43. **Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181-197.
44. SAS Institute. (1997). SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release 6.12. Cary, NC: Author.
45. **Seidenberg, M. S., Bruck, M., Fornarolo, G., & Backman, J. (1985) Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differ? Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 161-180.
46. **Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1992). Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 10, 639-648.
47. Siegel, L. S. (1991). The cognitive basis of dyslexia. In R. Pasnak & M. L. Howe (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development (pp. 33-52). New York: Springer-Verlag.
48. Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 10, 618-629.
49. Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: the influence of definitional variables. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 257-287.
50. **Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Williams, S. (1983). Some characteristics of 9-year-old boys with general reading backwardness or specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 3, 407-423.
51. Sparks, R. L. (1995). Phonological awareness in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing, 7, 217-235.
52. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
53. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-612.
54. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
55. Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 24-53.
56. Swanson, H. L. (1988). Learning disabled children's problem solving. Intelligence, 12, 261-278.
57. **Swanson, H. L. (1989). The effects of central processing strategies on learning disabled, mildly retarded, average and gifted children's elaborative encoding abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 370-397.
58. **Swanson, H. L. (1990). Executive processing differences between learning disabled, mildly retarded, and normal achieving children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 5, 549-563.
59. Swanson, H. L. (1993). An information processing analysis of learning disabled children's problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 861-893.
60. **Swanson, H. L. (1996). Theoretical, technical, and practical aspects of the S-Cognitive Processing Test: The development of a dynamic assessment measure. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 10A, 135-208.
61. Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128-158.
62. **Taylor, H. G., Satz, P. & Friel, J. (1979). Developmental dyslexia in relation to other childhood reading disorders: significance and clinical utility. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 1, 84-101.
63. Toth, G., & Siegel, L. (1994). A critical evaluation of the IQ-achievement discrepancy based definition of dyslexia. In K. van deb Bos, L. Siegel, D. Bakker, & D. Share (Eds.), Current Directions in Dyslexia Research (pp. 45-70). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
64. Wall, T. D., & Payne, R. (1973). Are deficiency scores deficient? Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 322-326.
65. Wanous, J. P., & Lawler, E. E. III (1972). Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 95-105.
66. Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Shinn, M. R., & McGrue, M. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. Journal of Special Education, 16, 73-85.
67. Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1982). Gain scores in research can be highly reliable. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 149-154.