Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 189-196

  Rechenberg, Dan Krister ^a   Göhring, Till N ^a   Attinc, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Ceramic inlays; Curing mode; Dentin adhesive; Insertion; Loading; Marginal adaptation; Pre curing

Indexed keywords

CALIBRA; CEREC; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; POLYMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SELF CURE ADHESIVE; XP BOND; XP-BOND;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL BONDING, CHEMICALLY-CURED; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYMERS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 77955867219     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a17650     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Effect of curing mode on microtensile bond strength to dentin of two dual-cured adhesive systems in combination with resin luting cements for indirect restorations. Oper Dent 2007;32:37-44.
2. Bortolotto T, Onisor I, Krejci I. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:35-43.
3. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:257-262.
4. Caughman WF, Chan DC, Rueggeberg FA. Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:101-106.
5. Coelho Santos MJ, Navarro MF, Tam L, McComb D. The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and microtensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:50-57.
6. de Menezes MJ, Arrais CA, Giannini M. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:115-121.
7. Denissen H, Dozic A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and shortterm clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, Cerec, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:506-513.
8. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:41-56.
9. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137 Suppl:22S-31S.
10. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etch-andrinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 2008;24:185-191.
11. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Nikolaenko SA. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(suppl 2):269-273.
12. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999;24:147-155.
13. Gohring TN, Schonenberger KA, Lutz F. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. Am J Dent 2003;16:275-282.
14. Grossman ES, Setzer S. Bonding agents: adhesive layer thickness and retention to cavity surfaces with time. SADJ 2001;56:266-272.
15. Haller B, Hassner K, Moll K. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites. Oper Dent 2003;28:574-584.
16. Hasler C, Zimmerli B, Lussi A. Curing capability of halogen and LED light curing units in deep class II cavities in extracted human molars. Oper Dent 2006;31:354-363.
17. Hayashi M, Yeung CA. Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;CD003450.
18. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:712-734.
19. Jung H, Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Furch H, Bernhart S, Schmalz G. Polymerization efficiency of different photocuring units through ceramic discs. Oper Dent 2006;31:68-77.
20. Jung H, Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Haller A, Schmalz G. Curing efficiency of different polymerization methods through ceramic restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:156-161.
21. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60D-76D.
22. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 1993;72:490-494.
23. Krejci I, Lutz F, Boretti R. Resin composite polishing-filling the gaps. Quintessence Int 1999;30:490-495.
24. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator [in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-960.
25. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:357-363.
26. Kurbad A, Reichel K. InEOS-new system component in Cerec 3D. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:77-84.
27. Lambrechts P, Debels E, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:693-701.
28. Lutz E, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-784.
29. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:144-54; discussion 155.
30. Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 2001;26:357-366.
31. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding-the effect of pre-curing the bonding resin. Br Dent J 1994;176:333-336.
32. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without ‘softstart-polymerization’. J Dent 1997;25:321-330.
33. Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Hardness development of dual-cured resin cements through different thicknesses of ceramics. Dent Mater J 2006;25:132-137.
34. Mormann WH, Brandestini M. Cerec-System: computerized inlays, onlays and shell veneers [in German]. Zahnarztl Mitt 1987;77:2400-2405.
35. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/ filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-1658.
36. Vandewalle KS, Roberts HW, Andrus JL, Dunn WJ. Effect of light dispersion of LED curing lights on resin composite polymerization. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:244-254; discussion 254-255.