Long-term student experiences in a hybrid, open-ended and problem based Adventure Learning program

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 280-296

  Veletsianos, George ^a   Doering, Aaron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955779277     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1096     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6160
3. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
5. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin: Springer.
7. Dahlgren, M. A., Castensson, R. & Dahlgren, L.O. (1998). PBL from the teachers' perspective. Higher Education, 36(4), 437-447.
8. Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education, 27(2), 197-215.
9. Doering, A. (2007). Adventure learning: Situating learning in an authentic context. Innovate-Journal of Online Education, 3(6). [verified 4 Apr 2010] http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol3_issue6/Adventure_Learning-__Situating_Learning_in_an_Authentic_Context.pdf
10. Doering, A., Scharber, C., Miller, C. & Veletsianos, G. (2009). GeoThentic: Designing and assessing with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3). http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss3/socialstudies/article1.cfm
11. Doering, A. & Veletsianos, G. (2007). Multi-scaffolding learning environment: An analysis of scaffolding and its impact on cognitive load and problem-solving ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 107-129.
12. Doering, A. & Veletsianos, G. (2008a). Hybrid online education: Identifying integration models using adventure learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 101-119.
13. Doering, A. & Veletsianos, G. (2008b). What lies beyond effectiveness and efficiency? Adventure learning design. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 137-144.
14. Egan, K. (1986). Teaching as storytelling: An alternative approach to teaching and curriculum in the elementary school. Ontario, Canada: Althouse Press.
15. Ertmer, P. & Simons, K. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K-12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 40-54.
16. Frykman, S. (2009). Stories to tell? Narrative tools in museum education texts. Educational Research, 51(3), 299-319.
17. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
18. Goodnough, K. & Cashion, M. (2006). Exploring problem-based learning in the context of high school science: Design and implementation issues. School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 280-295.
19. Haas Dyson, A. & Genishi, C. (2005). The case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
21. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
22. Hokanson, B. & Fraher, R. (2008). Narrative structure, myth, and cognition for instructional design. Educational Technology, 48(1), 27-32.
23. Parrish, P. (2008). Plotting a learning experience. In L. Botturi & T. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: theories and practices (pp. 91-111). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
24. Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9-20.
25. Saye, J. W. & Brush, T. A. (2007). Using technology-enhanced learning environments to support problem-based historical inquiry in secondary school classrooms. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(2), 196-230.
26. Taylor, S. I., Morris, V. G. & Cordeau-Young, C. (1997). Field trips in early childhood settings: Expanding the walls of the classroom. Early Childhood Education, 25(2), 141-146.
27. The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
28. Valanides, N. & Angeli C. (2008). Distributed cognition in a sixth-grade classroom: An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions about light and color. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(3), 309-336.
29. Veletsianos, G. & Kleanthous, I. (2009). A review of adventure learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 84-105. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/755/1435
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Wilson, B., Parrish, P. & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Raising the bar for instructional outcomes: Towards transformative learning experiences. Educational Technology, 48(3), 39-44.
32. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.