Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem

HIP International

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 136-142

  Lakstein, Dror ^a   Kosashvili, Yona ^a   Backstein, David ^a   Safir, Oleg ^a   Lee, Paul ^a   Gross, Allan E ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Femoral revision; Hip arthroplasty; Modular stem; Revision

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFT; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; DEVICES; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION;

EID: 77955737522     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070001002000202     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Saleh K J, Holtzman J, Gafni A, et al. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 1040-6.
2. Böhm P, Bischel O. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 420: 148-59.
3. Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Sr. Distal ingrowth components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 420: 135-41.
4. Krishnamurthy A B, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13- year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 839-47.
5. McAuley J P, Engh CA Jr. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 429: 215-21.
6. Sporer S M, Paprosky WG. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004: 429: 227-31.
7. Sporer S M, Paprosky WG. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003: 417: 203-9.
8. Dalury D F, Gonzales RA, Adams MJ. Minimum 5-year results in 96 consecutive hips treated with a tapered titanium stem system. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 104-7.
9. Köster G, Walde TA, Willert HG. Five- to 10-year results using a noncemented modular revision stem without bone grafting. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 7: 964-70.
10. Kwong L M, Miller AJ, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (Suppl 1): 94-7.
11. Paprosky W G, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 369: 230-42.
12. Rodriguez J A, Fada R, Murphy SB, Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 751-8.
13. Kang M N, Huddleston JI, Hwang K, Imrie S, Goodman SB. Early outcome of a modular femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 220-5.
14. Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 187-97.
15. Wagner H, Wagner M. Cone prosthesis for the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 88-95.
16. Garbuz D S, Toms A, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 199-202.
17. Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 1310-5.
18. Safir O, Kellett CF, Flint M, Backstein D, Gross AE. Revision of the deficient proximal femur with a proximal femoral allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 206-12.
19. Femoral stem fractures in Zimmer modular revision (ZMR) hip systems. TGA News 2003; 40: 20.
20. Callaghan J J, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow- up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 1074-85.
21. Hungerford D S, Jones LC. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 235: 12-24.
22. Moreland J R, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 393: 194-201.
23. Mulroy W F, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 325-30.
24. Leopold S S, Rosenberg AG. Current status of impaction allografting for revision of a femoral component. Instr Course Lect 2000; 49: 111-8.
25. Malkani A L, Settecerri JJ, Sim FH, Chao EY, Wallrichs SL. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 351-6.
26. Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R, Ganz R. Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: results at 2-9 years. Int Orthop 2002; 26: 36-9.
27. Cameron H U. Orthopaedic crossfire - Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (Suppl 1): 101-3.
28. Barrack R L. Orthopaedic crossfire - Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (Suppl 1): 98-100.
29. Wirtz D C, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, et al. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 134-8.
30. Mroczkowski M L, Hertzler JS, Humphrey SM, Johnson T, Blanchard CR. Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 271-9.
31. Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 1023-31.
32. McInnis D P, Horne G, Devane PA. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 372-80.