Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: In opposition

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 18, Issue 3 SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages 101-103

  Cameron, Hugh U ^a  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hip revision; Long stems; Modular stem; Modularity

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; JOINT STABILITY; LONG TERM CARE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; STEM MODULARITY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; ARTICLE; HIP PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 0041465739     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50076     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Duncan CP, Masterson EL, Masri BA: Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. Orthop Clin N Am 29:297, 1998
2. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mould arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737, 1969
3. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz AC: Modes of failure of cemented stem type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
4. Cameron HU: The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop 17(Suppl 1), 138, 2002
5. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG: Minimum 11-year follow up of extensively porous coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthrop 17(Suppl 1):134, 2002
6. Bircher HP, Reide U, Luem M, Oschner PE: The value of the Wagner SL revision prosthesis for bridging large femoral defects. Orthopade 30:294, 2001