From sunshine to double arrows: An evaluation window account of negative compatibility effects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 139, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 490-519

  Klauer, K C ^a   Dittrich, Kerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arrow priming; Category priming; Evaluative priming; Negative compatibility effects; Response control

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955733716     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019746     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abrams R.L., Klinger M.R., Greenwald A.G. Subliminal words activate semantic categories (not automated motor responses). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:100-106.
2. Bennett J.D., Lleras A., Oriet C., Enns J.T. A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:908-912.
3. Botvinick M., Braver T., Barch D., Carter C., Cohen J. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
4. Boy F., Clarke K., Sumner P. Mask stimulus triggers inhibition in subliminal visuomotor priming. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 190:111-116.
5. Boy, F., & Sumner, P. (in press). Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
6. Clark-Carter D. Quantitative psychological research: A student's handbook 2004, Psychology Press, New York, NY.
7. Degner J., Wentura D. Automatic prejudice in childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 98:356-374.
8. Dehaene S., Naccache L., LeClec'H G., Koechlin E., Mueller M., van de Moortele P., Le Bihan D. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature 1998, October, 395:597-600.
9. De Houwer J. A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion 2003, 219-244. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Musch, K.C. Klauer (Eds.).
10. Eder A. " Common Coding" von Handlung und Bewertung [Common coding of action and valence] 2006, Logos, Berlin, Germany.
11. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1737-1747.
12. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:514-520.
13. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:7-26.
14. Eimer M., Schubö A., Schlaghecken F. The locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor Behavior 2002, 34:3-10.
15. Fazio R.H., Sanbonmatsu D.M., Powell M.C., Kardes F.R. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 50:229-238.
16. Fockenberg D.A., Koole S.L., Semin G.R. Priming in concert: Assimilation and contrast with multiple affective and gender primes. Social Cognition 2008, 26:647-669.
17. Forster K.I., Mohan K., Hector J. The mechanics of masked priming. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, 3-38. Psychology Press, New York, NY. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
18. Gawronski B., Deutsch R., Seidel O. Contextual influences on implicit evaluation: A test of additive versus contrastive effects of evaluative context stimuli in affective priming. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:1226-1236.
19. Greenwald A.G., Draine S.C., Abrams R.L. Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science 1996, September, 273:1699-1702.
20. Hochhaus L., Johnston J.C. Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:355-366.
21. Huber D.E. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:324-347.
22. Jaśkowski P. The effect of nonmasking distractors on the priming of motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:456-468.
23. Jaśkowski P. The negative compatibility effect with nonmasking flankers: A case for mask-triggered inhibition hypothesis. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:765-777.
24. Jaśkowski P., Przekoracka-Krawczyk A. On the role of mask structure in subliminal priming. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 2005, 65:409-417.
25. Jaśkowski P., Verleger R. What determines the direction of subliminal priming?. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 3:181-192.
26. Kanwisher N.G., Potter M.C. Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:30-47.
27. Kiesel A., Berner M.P., Kunde W. Negative congruency effects: A test of the inhibition account. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:1-21.
28. Kiesel A., Kunde W., Pohl C., Hoffmann J. Priming from novel masked stimuli depends on target set size. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2006, 2:37-45.
29. Klapp S.T. Two versions of the negative compatibility effect: Comment on Lleras and Enns (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:431-435.
30. Klapp S.T., Haas B.W. Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response associations. Journal for Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:193-209.
31. Klapp S.T., Hinkley L.B. The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:255-269.
32. Klauer K.C., Eder A., Greenwald A.G., Abrams R. Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime words. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:63-83.
33. Klauer K.C., Mierke J., Musch J. The positivity proportion effect: A list context effect in masked affective priming. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:953-967.
34. Klauer K.C., Musch J. Affective priming: Findings and theories. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion 2003, 7-50. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Musch, K.C. Klauer (Eds.).
35. Klauer K.C., Musch J., Eder A. Priming of semantic classification: Late and response-related, or earlier and more central?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:897-903.
36. Klauer K.C., Teige-Mocigemba S., Spruyt A. Contrast effects in spontaneous evaluations: A psychophysical account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:265-287.
37. Kunde W., Kiesel A., Hoffmann J. Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition 2003, 88:223-242.
38. Lleras A., Enns J.T. Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:475-493.
39. Lleras A., Enns J.T. Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:436-440.
40. Lleras A., Enns J.T. How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: A reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:495-500.
41. McClelland J.L. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review 1979, 86:287-330.
42. Miller G.A. Mathematics and psychology 1964, Wiley, New York, NY.
43. Müsseler J., Hommel B. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:861-872.
44. Praamstra P., Seiss E. The neurophysiology of response competition: Motor cortex activation and inhibition following subliminal response priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:483-493.
45. Proctor R.W., Cho Y.S. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132:416-442.
46. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 1978, 85:59-108.
47. Reynvoet B., Gevers W., Caessens B. Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:991-1000.
48. Rothermund K. Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence. Emotion 2003, 3:223-238.
49. Schlaghecken F., Blagrove E., Maylor E.A. No difference between conscious and nonconscious visuomotor control: Evidence from perceptual learning in the masked prime task. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:84-93.
50. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:1367-1382.
51. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64:148-162.
52. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaśkowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:484-494.
53. Schlaghecken F., Klapp S., Maylor E.A. Either or neither, but not both: Locating the effects of masked primes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 276:515-521.
54. Sumner P. Negative and positive masked-priming: Implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 3:317-326.
55. Sumner P., Brandwood T. Oscillations in motor priming: Postitive rebound follows inhibitory phase in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior 2008, 40:484-489.
56. Sumner P., Husain M. At the edge of consciousness: Automatic motor activation and voluntary control. Neuroscientist 2008, 14:474-486.
57. Sumner P., Tsai P.-C., Yu K., Nachev P. Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103:10520-10525.
58. Townsend J.T., Ashby F.G. The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
59. Usher M., McClelland J.L. The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 2001, 108:550-592.
60. Verleger R., Jaśkowski P., Aydemir A., van der Lubbe R.H.J., Groen M. Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:494-515.
61. Voss A., Leonhart R., Stahl C. How to make your own response boxes: A step-by-step guide for the construction of reliable and inexpensive parallel-port response pads from computer mice. Behaviour Research Methods 2007, 39:797-801.
62. Wittenbrink B. Measuring attitudes through priming. Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies 2007, 17-58. Guilford Press, New York, NY. B. Wittenbrink, N. Schwarz (Eds.).