Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response associations

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 193-209

  Klapp, Stuart T ^a   Haas, Brian W ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONING; DECISION MAKING; EGO DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

ASSOCIATION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 14544294949     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.193     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abrams, R. L., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118-124.
2. Abrams, R. L., Klinger, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Subliminal words activate semantic categories (not automated motor responses). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 100-106.
3. Bridgeman, B. (2002). Attention and visually guided behavior in distinct systems. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 120-135). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Brown, L. E., Moore, C. M., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2002). Feature-specific perceptual processing dissociates action from recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1330-1344.
5. Damian, M. K. (2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: Automaticity rather than semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 154-165.
6. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
7. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
8. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2001). Response facilitation and inhibition in manual, vocal, and oculomotor performance: Evidence for a modality-unspecific mechanism. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 16-26.
9. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514-520.
10. Eimer, M., Schubo, A., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 3-10.
11. Hochhaus, L., & Johnston, J. C. (1996). Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 355-366.
12. Holender, J. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
13. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2003). Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings. Journal of Vision, 3, 32-40.
14. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Henry Holt.
15. Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 135-150.
16. Klapp, S. T., Boches, C. A., Trabert, M. L., & Logan, G. D. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: II. Are there practice effects after automaticity is achieved? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 196-209.
17. Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269.
18. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
19. Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179-195.
20. Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197-237.
21. McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168-180.
22. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
24. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382.
25. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162.
26. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Subliminal stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 463-468.